Suppr超能文献

经直肠超声引导下前列腺活检术中用于疼痛控制的局部麻醉:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Local anesthesia for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Yan Pu, Wang Xiao-Yan, Huang Wei, Zhang Yong

机构信息

Beijing Tian Tan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Neurology Research Division, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Disease, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2016 Oct 11;9:787-796. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S117451. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrarectal local anesthestic (IRLA), periprostatic nerve block (PPNB), and the combined modalities in alleviating the pain during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about IRLA vs no anesthesia or placebo gel; PPNB vs no injection, periprostatic placebo injection, or IRLA; combined PPNB and IRLA vs PPNB alone; and combined PPNB and intraprostatic nerve block (IPNB) vs PPNB alone before TRUS-guided biopsy. Sources included MEDILINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from 1980 to 2016. The main outcomes were biopsy pain score, probe manipulation pain score, and anesthetic infiltration pain score assessed by the visual pain scale.

RESULTS

A total of 26 articles involving 36 RCTs were used in this analysis: Although IRLA can lead to pain reduction, the result was not statistically significant when compared with no anesthesia or placebo gel (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -0.22, 95% CI: -0.45 to 0, =0.06). PPNB can lead to significantly lower biopsy pain scores when compared with no analgesia (WMD: -1.32, 95% CI: -1.68 to -0.95, <0.00001), placebo injection (WMD: -2.62, 95% CI: -3.16 to -2.07, <0.00001), or IRLA (WMD: -1.31, 95% CI: -1.40 to -1.22, <0.00001). PPNB + IRLA can lead to significantly lower biopsy pain scores when compared with PPNB alone (WMD: -0.45, 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.28, <0.00001). PPNB + IPNB can lead to significantly lower biopsy pain scores when compared with PPNB alone (WMD: -0.73, 95% CI: -0.92 to -0.55, <0.00001). There were no severe reported general or local complications related to local anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicates that a combination of PPNB and IRLA/IPNB is effective and safe in alleviating the pain during TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to validate this result.

摘要

背景

进行一项荟萃分析以评估直肠内局部麻醉(IRLA)、前列腺周围神经阻滞(PPNB)以及联合方式在减轻经直肠超声(TRUS)引导下前列腺穿刺活检术中疼痛方面的疗效和安全性。

材料与方法

进行文献综述以识别所有已发表的关于IRLA与不麻醉或安慰剂凝胶对比;PPNB与不注射、前列腺周围安慰剂注射或IRLA对比;PPNB与IRLA联合对比单独使用PPNB;以及在TRUS引导下活检前PPNB与前列腺内神经阻滞(IPNB)联合对比单独使用PPNB的随机对照试验(RCT)。资料来源包括1980年至2016年的MEDILINE、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆。主要结局为通过视觉疼痛量表评估的穿刺活检疼痛评分、探头操作疼痛评分和麻醉剂浸润疼痛评分。

结果

本分析共纳入26篇文章,涉及36项RCT:尽管IRLA可减轻疼痛,但与不麻醉或安慰剂凝胶相比,结果无统计学意义(加权平均差[WMD]:-0.22,95%置信区间:-0.45至0,P = 0.06)。与不进行镇痛(WMD:-1.32,95%置信区间:-1.68至-0.95,P<0.00001)、安慰剂注射(WMD:-2.62,95%置信区间:-3.16至-2.07,P<0.00001)或IRLA(WMD:-1.31,95%置信区间:-1.40至-1.22,P<0.00001)相比,PPNB可显著降低穿刺活检疼痛评分。与单独使用PPNB相比,PPNB + IRLA可显著降低穿刺活检疼痛评分(WMD:-0.45,95%置信区间:-0.62至-0.28,P<0.00001)。与单独使用PPNB相比,PPNB + IPNB可显著降低穿刺活检疼痛评分(WMD:-0.73,95%置信区间:-0.92至-0.55,P<0.00001)。未报告与局部麻醉相关的严重全身或局部并发症。

结论

该荟萃分析表明,PPNB与IRLA/IPNB联合在减轻TRUS引导下前列腺穿刺活检术中疼痛方面有效且安全。需要进一步的高质量RCT来验证这一结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4cf/5067058/239be7b3d6c9/jpr-9-787Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验