Gilpin Leigh, Zekan David, Baugh Bryce, Patel Apexa, Deslich Stacie A, Deem Samuel, Fitzwater Ryan, Lohri Joshua, Tierney James, Hale Nathan E
Department of Urology, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, USA.
Research Urology, Charleston Area Medical Center, Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Charleston, USA.
Cureus. 2022 Sep 26;14(9):e29598. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29598. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Introduction Rezum is a minimally invasive, outpatient procedure using convective water vapor to relieve outlet obstruction from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Evidence on the technical approach of Rezum therapy, particularly pain control, is lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of utilizing a local anesthetic prostate block for postoperative pain control during Rezum therapy for BPH. A multimodal approach is typically utilized for pain control during and after Rezum. However, little is known about which elements are most critical. Methods This is a single-center retrospective study of 109 patients who underwent Rezum for BPH. Patients were then divided into two groups: Local anesthetic prostatic block verse no local anesthetic prostatic block for the procedure. A phone survey was performed to assess the patients' subjective pain scores and postoperative analgesics usage. A comparison of reported pain scores on a 0-10 Likert scale as well as usage of prescription and non-prescription analgesics medications was performed. Results There were 109 patients who underwent Rezum therapy, and 86 (79%) of patients responded to phone surveys. There was no significant difference in postoperative pain scores between patients who received local anesthetic prostatic block vs those who did not (2.10 vs 3.03). Similarly, there were no significant differences in postoperative narcotics or non-prescription analgesic medications usage. Conclusion Our data suggest that when performing Rezum using conscious sedation in the operating room or cystoscopy suite, it is unnecessary to perform a local anesthetic prostate block as it has no significant effect on patient-reported pain or the use of analgesics in the postoperative period.
引言
Rezum是一种微创门诊手术,利用对流水蒸气缓解良性前列腺增生(BPH)引起的出口梗阻。目前缺乏关于Rezum治疗技术方法,尤其是疼痛控制方面的证据。本研究的目的是评估在Rezum治疗BPH期间使用局部麻醉前列腺阻滞进行术后疼痛控制的疗效。在Rezum治疗期间及之后,通常采用多模式方法进行疼痛控制。然而,对于哪些因素最为关键,人们了解甚少。
方法
这是一项对109例接受Rezum治疗BPH患者的单中心回顾性研究。然后将患者分为两组:手术中接受局部麻醉前列腺阻滞组与未接受局部麻醉前列腺阻滞组。通过电话调查评估患者的主观疼痛评分和术后镇痛药使用情况。对采用0至10李克特量表报告的疼痛评分以及处方和非处方镇痛药的使用情况进行比较。
结果
共有109例患者接受了Rezum治疗,86例(79%)患者回应了电话调查。接受局部麻醉前列腺阻滞的患者与未接受的患者术后疼痛评分无显著差异(分别为2.10和3.03)。同样,术后麻醉药品或非处方镇痛药的使用也无显著差异。
结论
我们的数据表明,在手术室或膀胱镜检查室使用清醒镇静进行Rezum手术时未必要进行局部麻醉前列腺阻滞,因为其对患者报告的疼痛或术后镇痛药的使用无显著影响。