Behrendt Mark A, van Rhijn Bas W G
Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; ; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Transl Androl Urol. 2016 Oct;5(5):655-661. doi: 10.21037/tau.2016.04.01.
Urachal cancer (UraC) is a rare tumor entity that usually develops at the basis of the remnant embryologic urachus. Consisting of mostly adenocarcinomas, most patients present with secondary symptoms due to an advanced stage with urinary bladder infiltration. One third of patients are already metastasized at presentation rendering them unsuitable for curative surgical treatment. In order to improve staging, treatment and follow-up, adequate knowledge about the genetic origin and potential markers is necessary. This paper reviews the English literature until December 2015. Pathologists argue for and against metaplasia or remnant enteric cells as origin for the adenomatous tissue found in UraC. Mutations in KRAS, BRAF, GNAS and Her2 have been associated with UraC. Immunohistochemical (IHC) markers like CEA, 34βE12, Claudin-18 and RegIV are indicative for mucous producing UraC. So far, IHC markers fail as prognosticators when matched to clinical data. Little is known about serum markers for UraC. CEA, CA19-9, CA125 and CA724 are mentioned as being elevated in UraC by some reports. Regarding the literature for biological markers in UraC, knowledge is mostly derived from case reports or cohort studies mentioning markers or predictors. More genetic research is needed to show whether UraC stems from progenitor cells of the cloaca or is due to metaplasia of transitional cells. Few IHC markers have shown indicative potential for UraC. A useful panel for differential diagnostics and clinicopathologic prognostication needs to be developed. Serum markers show very little potential for neither diagnosis nor follow-up in UraC. Further research on larger cohorts is necessary.
脐尿管癌(UraC)是一种罕见的肿瘤实体,通常发生于胚胎残留脐尿管的根部。其主要由腺癌组成,大多数患者因疾病晚期侵犯膀胱而出现继发症状。三分之一的患者在初诊时已发生转移,因此不适合进行根治性手术治疗。为了改善分期、治疗和随访效果,有必要充分了解其遗传起源和潜在标志物。本文回顾了截至2015年12月的英文文献。病理学家对于脐尿管癌中发现的腺瘤样组织起源于化生或残留肠细胞存在争议。KRAS、BRAF、GNAS和Her2的突变与脐尿管癌有关。免疫组化(IHC)标志物如癌胚抗原(CEA)、34βE12、紧密连接蛋白-18和再生胰岛衍生蛋白IV(RegIV)可提示产生黏液的脐尿管癌。到目前为止,当与临床数据匹配时,免疫组化标志物不能作为预后指标。关于脐尿管癌的血清标志物知之甚少。一些报告提到,脐尿管癌患者的癌胚抗原、糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)、糖类抗原125(CA125)和糖类抗原724(CA724)水平会升高。关于脐尿管癌生物标志物的文献,相关知识大多来自提及标志物或预测指标的病例报告或队列研究。需要更多的基因研究来表明脐尿管癌是起源于泄殖腔的祖细胞还是移行细胞化生。很少有免疫组化标志物显示出对脐尿管癌的指示潜力。需要开发一个用于鉴别诊断和临床病理预后评估的有用指标组合。血清标志物在脐尿管癌的诊断和随访中几乎没有显示出任何潜力。有必要对更大的队列进行进一步研究。