Mohiuddin Jahan J, Deal Allison M, Carey Lisa A, Lund Jennifer L, Baker Brock R, Zagar Timothy M, Jones Ellen L, Marks Lawrence B, Chen Ronald C
School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Biostatistics Core Facility, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Nov;223(5):717-728.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.08.541.
BACKGROUND: Multiple clinical trials have shown that neoadjuvant systemic therapy has a benefit in women who are borderline lumpectomy candidates and in those with locally advanced breast cancers by reducing the mastectomy rate and making inoperable tumors operable. The study aim was to examine the patterns of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy use among younger women in the United States treated at different types of cancer centers. STUDY DESIGN: Data from the National Cancer Data Base for 118,086 women younger than 65 years with clinical stage IIA (T2N0 only) to IIIC breast cancer. Following the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline categorization, patients were grouped into those who were borderline lumpectomy candidates (clinical stage IIA [T2N0 only], IIB, or IIIA [T3N1 only]) or those with locally advanced disease (clinical stage IIIA [T0-3N2 only], IIIB, or IIIC). The main outcome was the proportion of women who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy. RESULTS: Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy ranged from 17% (stage IIA) to 79% (stage IIIB). Across almost all stage and receptor subtypes, the use was lower in community vs academic centers. On multivariable analysis, use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was decreased in community vs academic centers (borderline lumpectomy candidates: adjusted risk ratio = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69-0.77; locally advanced disease: adjusted risk ratio = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Use of guideline-concordant neoadjuvant chemotherapy is significantly higher among women treated at academic vs community centers in young and healthy women who do not commonly have contraindications to this treatment. Our study identified a potential disparity in cancer care by type of center where patients receive treatment.
背景:多项临床试验表明,新辅助全身治疗对那些处于保乳手术边缘的女性以及局部晚期乳腺癌患者有益,可降低乳房切除术率,并使原本无法手术的肿瘤变得可手术切除。本研究的目的是调查美国不同类型癌症中心治疗的年轻女性中新辅助化疗和内分泌治疗的使用模式。 研究设计:来自国家癌症数据库的118086名65岁以下临床IIA期(仅T2N0)至IIIC期乳腺癌女性的数据。按照美国国立综合癌症网络指南分类,患者被分为保乳手术边缘候选人(临床IIA期[仅T2N0]、IIB期或IIIA期[仅T3N1])或局部晚期疾病患者(临床IIIA期[仅T0 - 3N2]、IIIB期或IIIC期)。主要结局是接受新辅助全身治疗的女性比例。 结果:新辅助化疗的使用率从17%(IIA期)到79%(IIIB期)不等。在几乎所有分期和受体亚型中,社区中心的使用率低于学术中心。多变量分析显示,与学术中心相比,社区中心新辅助化疗的使用率降低(保乳手术边缘候选人:调整风险比 = 0.73;95%置信区间,0.69 - 0.77;局部晚期疾病:调整风险比 = 0.78;95%置信区间,0.74 - 0.83)。 结论:在年轻且健康、通常无该治疗禁忌证的女性中,学术中心治疗的女性使用符合指南的新辅助化疗的比例显著高于社区中心。我们的研究发现了患者接受治疗的中心类型在癌症治疗方面存在潜在差异。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018-2-21
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008-5
Magy Seb. 2011-10
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024-7
Glob Epidemiol. 2022-9-8
Int J Part Ther. 2018
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015-4
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012-11-8