Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Department Radiopharmaceutical and Chemical Biology, Dresden, Germany.
Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Centre for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Teltow, Germany; Helmholtz Virtual Institute 'Multifunctional Biomaterials for Medicine', Teltow, Germany.
Trends Biotechnol. 2017 Mar;35(3):265-277. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.09.007. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
Endothelial cell (EC) models have evolved as important tools in biomaterial research due to ubiquitously occurring interactions between implanted materials and the endothelium. However, screening the available literature has revealed a gap between material scientists and physiologists in terms of their understanding of these biomaterial-endothelium interactions and their relative importance. Consequently, EC models are often applied in nonphysiological experimental setups, or too extensive conclusions are drawn from their results. The question arises whether this might be one reason why, among the many potential biomaterials, only a few have found their way into the clinic. In this review, we provide an overview of established EC models and possible selection criteria to enable researchers to determine the most reliable and relevant EC model to use.
内皮细胞 (EC) 模型已成为生物材料研究中的重要工具,因为植入材料与内皮之间普遍存在相互作用。然而,对现有文献的筛选表明,材料科学家和生理学家在理解这些生物材料-内皮相互作用及其相对重要性方面存在差距。因此,EC 模型通常应用于非生理实验设置,或者从其结果中得出过于广泛的结论。问题是,这是否是众多潜在生物材料中只有少数几种进入临床应用的原因之一。在这篇综述中,我们提供了已建立的 EC 模型概述和可能的选择标准,以使研究人员能够确定最可靠和相关的 EC 模型来使用。