Kang Erin, Klein Eliana F, Lillard Angeline S, Lerner Matthew D
Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook NY, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville VA, USA.
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 13;7:1577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01577. eCollection 2016.
Although pretend play has long been linked to children's normative cognitive development, inconsistent findings call for greater rigor in examining this relation (Lillard et al., 2013). Spontaneous pretend play is often impacted in atypical development, notably in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Since ASD traits exist along a continuum in the general population, investigating how pretend play varies across the range of ASD symptoms by indexing variations in ASD traits in both typically developing and ASD populations may provide insight into how ASD symptoms may influence the relation between pretend play and associated processes in cognitive development. This study used rigorous observational methods to assess spontaneous pretend play. Specifically, 5-min free-play sessions with two discrete toy sets were double-coded by blinded coders (coder assignment counterbalanced). Key facets of pretense development [attribution of pretend properties (APP), object substitution (OS), imaginary objects] were examined. These facets of pretend play production were then analyzed in relation to ASD symptoms, as well as plausible, long-theorized correlates [theory of mind (ToM), verbal ability, familiarity, and interest in specific toys]. Forty children ( = 6;5, = 1.45; 29 males), six of whom met the threshold for ASD diagnosis via parent-reported ASD symptoms, participated in play sessions and completed measures of verbal IQ and ToM. Besides the measure of child ASD symptoms, parents completed a survey of their child's interest in and familiarity with the play session toys. Overall, greater ToM predicted more APP, and more interest in the toys presented predicted more OS. In terms of overall pretend play production, two results were counterintuitive. First, among children with more ASD symptoms, verbal ability marginally negatively predicted pretend play production. Second, among children with fewer ASD symptoms, ToM negatively predicted pretend play production. Further probing revealed that the negative effect of ASD symptoms on pretend play was simultaneously moderated by both variables: low ToM and high verbal ability both related to less pretend play production among children with more ASD symptoms. Implications for assessment and subsequent treatment for pretend ability among children with varying degrees of ASD symptoms, as well as for future research, are discussed.
尽管假装游戏长期以来一直与儿童的正常认知发展相关联,但研究结果的不一致性要求在检验这种关系时要更加严谨(利拉德等人,2013年)。自发假装游戏在非典型发展中常常受到影响,尤其是在自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)中。由于ASD特征在普通人群中呈连续分布,通过对典型发展人群和ASD人群的ASD特征变化进行索引,研究假装游戏在ASD症状范围内如何变化,可能会深入了解ASD症状如何影响假装游戏与认知发展中相关过程之间的关系。本研究采用了严谨的观察方法来评估自发假装游戏。具体而言,使用两套不同的玩具进行5分钟的自由游戏环节,由不知情的编码员进行双重编码(编码员分配经过平衡处理)。对假装游戏发展的关键方面[假装属性的赋予(APP)、物体替代(OS)、想象物体]进行了考察。然后分析这些假装游戏产生方面与ASD症状以及长期以来被认为合理的相关因素[心理理论(ToM)、语言能力、熟悉程度以及对特定玩具的兴趣]之间的关系。40名儿童(平均年龄 = 6岁5个月,标准差 = 1.45;29名男性)参与了游戏环节,其中6名儿童通过家长报告的ASD症状达到了ASD诊断阈值,他们还完成了语言智商和ToM的测量。除了测量儿童的ASD症状外,家长还完成了一项关于孩子对游戏环节玩具的兴趣和熟悉程度的调查。总体而言,较高的ToM预示着更多的APP,对所呈现玩具的更多兴趣预示着更多的OS。在总体假装游戏产生方面,有两个结果与直觉相反。首先,在ASD症状较多的儿童中,语言能力对假装游戏产生有轻微的负向预测作用。其次,在ASD症状较少的儿童中,ToM对假装游戏产生有负向预测作用。进一步探究发现,ASD症状对假装游戏的负面影响同时受到两个变量的调节:低ToM和高语言能力都与ASD症状较多的儿童中较少的假装游戏产生相关。文中讨论了对不同程度ASD症状儿童假装能力评估及后续治疗的启示,以及对未来研究的启示。