Sagarad Suresh V, Sukhani Neha, Machanur Basavaraj, Patil Shashidhar
Assistant Professor, Department of Cardiology, Rajiv Gandhi Super Speciality Hospital, Raichur Institute of Medical Sciences , Raichur, Karnataka, India .
Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, Raichur Institute of Medical Sciences , Raichur, Karnataka, India .
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Sep;10(9):OC40-OC42. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/21281.8581. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
Non-invasive tests are used to diagnose and prognosticate Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) patients and also in pre-operative evaluation and rehabilitation. Millions of these tests are performed worldwide in these situations. However, previous studies have shown inappropriate use of these tests.
The study was to evaluate the appropriate use of treadmill exercise test.
The present retrospective study was done in Rajiv Gandhi Super Speciality Hospital, Raichur and Institute of Medical sciences and RKB Super Speciality Clinic, Raichur, Karnataka, India. Tread Mill Tests (TMT) which were done between November 2013 and February 2016 were included in the study. A total of 600 tests were evaluated for appropriateness. Demographic, clinical and risk factors, indications were studied.
Overall 298 (49.66%) tests were found to be inappro-priate. Younger age, female sex, pre-operative evaluation, evaluation in master health check up and insurance were predictors of inappropriate use (p<0.05) in this study.
The treadmill exercise testing appears to be particularly vulnerable to overuse in clinical setting due to its wide availability, affordability and awareness. The inappropriate use of the method, however, may result in additional unnecessary cost to health care system.
非侵入性检查用于诊断和预测冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者,也用于术前评估和康复。在这些情况下,全球范围内进行了数百万次此类检查。然而,先前的研究表明这些检查存在使用不当的情况。
本研究旨在评估平板运动试验的合理使用情况。
本回顾性研究在印度卡纳塔克邦赖丘尔的拉吉夫·甘地超级专科医院以及赖丘尔的医学科学研究所和RKB超级专科诊所进行。纳入了2013年11月至2016年2月期间进行的平板运动试验(TMT)。共评估了600次检查的合理性。研究了人口统计学、临床和风险因素、适应症。
总体而言,298次(49.66%)检查被发现不合理。在本研究中,年龄较小、女性、术前评估、全面健康检查评估和保险是使用不当的预测因素(p<0.05)。
由于平板运动试验广泛可得、价格可承受且认知度高,在临床环境中似乎特别容易被过度使用。然而,该方法的不当使用可能会给医疗保健系统带来额外的不必要成本。