• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving Communication and Resolution Following Adverse Events Using a Patient-Created Simulation Exercise.通过患者创建的模拟练习改善不良事件后的沟通与解决
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):2537-2549. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12601. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
2
Bioethics for clinicians: 23. Disclosure of medical error.临床医生的生物伦理学:23. 医疗差错的披露。
CMAJ. 2001 Feb 20;164(4):509-13.
3
Collaboration with Regulators to Support Quality and Accountability Following Medical Errors: The Communication and Resolution Program Certification Pilot.与监管机构合作以在医疗差错后支持质量和问责制:沟通与解决计划认证试点项目
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):2569-2582. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12557. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
4
Rapid Learning of Adverse Medical Event Disclosure and Apology.快速学习不良医疗事件的披露与道歉。
J Patient Saf. 2016 Sep;12(3):140-7. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000080.
5
Apologizing for adverse outcomes.为不良后果道歉。
JAAPA. 2007 Sep;20(9):47-8.
6
Progress at the Intersection of Patient Safety and Medical Liability: Insights from the AHRQ Patient Safety and Medical Liability Demonstration Program.患者安全与医疗责任交叉领域的进展:来自美国医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全与医疗责任示范项目的见解
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):2414-2430. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12625.
7
Full disclosure when bad things happen.坏事发生时要完全披露。
Neonatal Netw. 2007 Mar-Apr;26(2):131-2. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.26.2.131.
8
Improving patient-centered communication: Results of a randomized controlled trial.改善以患者为中心的沟通:一项随机对照试验的结果
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jan;99(1):117-24. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.08.012. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
9
Resolving Malpractice Claims after Tort Reform: Experience in a Self-Insured Texas Public Academic Health System.侵权法改革后解决医疗事故索赔:德克萨斯州一个自我投保的公立学术医疗系统的经验。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):2615-2633. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12609. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
10
Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.手术不良事件、风险管理与医疗事故结果:发病率和死亡率审查是不够的。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072267.19263.26.

引用本文的文献

1
Progress at the Intersection of Patient Safety and Medical Liability: Insights from the AHRQ Patient Safety and Medical Liability Demonstration Program.患者安全与医疗责任交叉领域的进展:来自美国医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全与医疗责任示范项目的见解
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):2414-2430. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12625.
2
Paving the Way for Progress: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety and Medical Liability Demonstration Initiative.为进步铺平道路:医疗保健研究与质量局患者安全与医疗责任示范倡议
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):2401-2413. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12632.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients and families as teachers: a mixed methods assessment of a collaborative learning model for medical error disclosure and prevention.患者及家属作为教育者:对医疗差错披露与预防协作学习模式的混合方法评估
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):615-25. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004292. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
2
Speak Up! Addressing the Paradox Plaguing Patient-Centered Care.大声说出来!解决困扰以患者为中心的医疗护理的悖论。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 May 3;164(9):618-9. doi: 10.7326/M15-2416. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
3
The wisdom of patients and families: ignore it at our peril.患者及家属的智慧:忽视它将自担风险。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Oct;24(10):603-4. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004573. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
4
A patient-initiated voluntary online survey of adverse medical events: the perspective of 696 injured patients and families.一项由患者发起的关于不良医疗事件的自愿在线调查:696名受伤患者及其家属的观点。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Oct;24(10):620-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003980. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
5
The educational value of improvisational actors to teach communication and relational skills: perspectives of interprofessional learners, faculty, and actors.即兴表演演员在教授沟通和人际关系技巧方面的教育价值:跨专业学习者、教师和演员的观点。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Sep;96(3):381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
6
Communication-and-resolution programs: the challenges and lessons learned from six early adopters.沟通与解决计划:来自六个早期采用者的挑战与经验教训
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jan;33(1):20-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0828.
7
How policy makers can smooth the way for communication-and- resolution programs.政策制定者如何为沟通与解决计划铺平道路。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jan;33(1):11-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0930.
8
Survey shows that at least some physicians are not always open or honest with patients.调查显示,至少有一些医生并非总是对患者坦诚相待。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Feb;31(2):383-91. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1137.
9
More than words: patients' views on apology and disclosure when things go wrong in cancer care.言不尽意:癌症护理出问题时患者对道歉和信息披露的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Mar;90(3):341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.010. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
10
Accountability for medical error: moving beyond blame to advocacy.医疗差错的问责制:从指责走向倡导。
Chest. 2011 Aug;140(2):519-526. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-2533.

通过患者创建的模拟练习改善不良事件后的沟通与解决

Improving Communication and Resolution Following Adverse Events Using a Patient-Created Simulation Exercise.

作者信息

Gallagher Thomas H, Etchegaray Jason M, Bergstedt Brandelyn, Chappelle Amelia M, Ottosen Madelene J, Sedlock Emily W, Thomas Eric J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, UW Medicine Center for Scholarship in Patient Care Quality and Safety, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):2537-2549. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12601. Epub 2016 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12601
PMID:27790708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5134348/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The response to adverse events can lack patient-centeredness, perhaps because the involved institutions and other stakeholders misunderstand what patients and families go through after care breakdowns.

STUDY SETTING

Washington and Texas.

STUDY DESIGN

The HealthPact Patient and Family Advisory Council (PFAC) created and led a five-stage simulation exercise to help stakeholders understand what patients experience following an adverse event. The half-day exercise was presented twice.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Lessons learned related to the development and conduct of the exercise were synthesized from planning notes, attendee evaluations, and exercise discussion notes.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

One hundred ninety-four individuals attended (86 Washington and 108 Texas). Take-homes from these exercises included the fact that the response to adverse events can be complex, siloed, and uncoordinated. Participating in this simulation exercise led stakeholders and patient advocates to express interest in continued collaboration.

CONCLUSIONS

A PFAC-designed simulation can help stakeholders understand patient and family experiences following adverse events and potentially improve their response to these events.

摘要

目的

对不良事件的应对可能缺乏以患者为中心的理念,这或许是因为相关机构和其他利益相关者误解了患者及其家属在医疗失误后的经历。

研究地点

华盛顿州和得克萨斯州。

研究设计

健康契约患者及家属咨询委员会(PFAC)创建并主导了一项分五个阶段的模拟演练,以帮助利益相关者了解患者在不良事件后的经历。这项为期半天的演练进行了两次。

数据收集与分析

从规划笔记、参会者评估和演练讨论笔记中总结了与演练开发和实施相关的经验教训。

主要发现

194人参加了演练(86人来自华盛顿州,108人来自得克萨斯州)。这些演练的收获包括对不良事件的应对可能复杂、分散且不协调。参与此次模拟演练使利益相关者和患者权益倡导者表示有兴趣继续合作。

结论

PFAC设计的模拟演练有助于利益相关者了解不良事件后患者及其家属的经历,并有可能改善他们对这些事件的应对。