Thase Michael, Asami Yuko, Wajsbrot Dalia, Dorries Kathleen, Boucher Matthieu, Pappadopulos Elizabeth
a Perelman School of Medicine , University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia , USA.
b Pfizer Japan Inc , Tokyo , Japan.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Feb;33(2):317-326. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1255185. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
To evaluate the short-term efficacy of venlafaxine extended release (ER) 75-225 mg/day compared with placebo for treating major depressive disorder (MDD) and to examine associations between baseline characteristics and efficacy outcomes in MDD patients treated with venlafaxine ER 75-225 mg/day.
This meta-analysis included published and unpublished short-term, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Wyeth/Pfizer sponsored studies of venlafaxine ER at doses up to 225 mg/day in adults with MDD.
All trials were conducted before trial registration became mandatory.
Change from baseline in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) total score was analyzed over time using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures with terms for study, treatment group, visit, interaction between treatment group and visit, and baseline score as a covariate. Associations between baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and the probability of HAM-D response and remission at week 8 were evaluated using logistic regression models, with terms for study, treatment group, and baseline characteristics in the models. Safety and tolerability was assessed based on adverse events (AEs) and discontinuations due to AEs.
The full analysis set included 1087 patients from five studies that fulfilled selection criteria. Statistically significant separation between venlafaxine ER and placebo groups for HAM-D total score was seen at week 2 and all subsequent assessments (p-values <.0001). There was no significant interaction between treatment and baseline HAM-D total score. Probability of HAM-D remission at week 8 decreased with increasing baseline HAM-D total score (p = .0012; OR: 0.94); however, baseline HAM-D total score did not predict response. Discontinuations due to AEs were reported for 9.4% of venlafaxine-ER-treated patients compared with 3.6% of placebo-treated patients. Key limitations: Five studies met the criteria for inclusion. Several differences in design between included studies limited the analysis: one study did not include a week 3 assessment (the week 3 time point was therefore dropped from the analysis), one study had two venlafaxine ER dose arms, which were combined into one group for the meta-analysis, and mixed- and flexible-dose studies were pooled.
Venlafaxine ER 75-225 mg/day effectively reduced symptoms of depression in patients with MDD overall and in patients with either lower (≤23) or higher (>23) HAM-D total score at baseline.
评估每日75 - 225毫克文拉法辛缓释剂(ER)与安慰剂相比治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)的短期疗效,并研究基线特征与接受每日75 - 225毫克文拉法辛ER治疗的MDD患者疗效结果之间的关联。
这项荟萃分析纳入了已发表和未发表的短期、双盲、安慰剂对照、由惠氏/辉瑞赞助的研究,这些研究针对患有MDD的成年人使用剂量高达每日225毫克的文拉法辛ER。
所有试验均在试验注册成为强制性要求之前进行。
使用重复测量的混合效应模型,将研究、治疗组、访视、治疗组与访视之间的交互作用以及基线分数作为协变量,分析17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM - D)总分相对于基线的变化情况。使用逻辑回归模型评估基线人口统计学和临床特征与第8周时HAM - D反应和缓解概率之间的关联,模型中纳入研究、治疗组和基线特征等项。基于不良事件(AE)和因AE导致的停药情况评估安全性和耐受性。
完整分析集包括来自五项符合入选标准研究的1087名患者。在第2周及随后所有评估中,文拉法辛ER组与安慰剂组在HAM - D总分上存在统计学显著差异(p值 <.0001)。治疗与基线HAM - D总分之间无显著交互作用。第8周时HAM - D缓解概率随基线HAM - D总分升高而降低(p = 0.0012;OR:0.94);然而,基线HAM - D总分不能预测反应情况。接受文拉法辛ER治疗的患者中有9.4%因AE停药,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者中这一比例为3.6%。主要局限性:五项研究符合纳入标准。纳入研究在设计上存在一些差异,限制了分析:一项研究未包括第3周评估(因此第3周时间点从分析中剔除),一项研究有两个文拉法辛ER剂量组,在荟萃分析中合并为一组,并且混合剂量和灵活剂量研究被汇总在一起。
每日75 - 225毫克文拉法辛ER总体上有效减轻了MDD患者的抑郁症状,对基线HAM - D总分较低(≤23)或较高(>23)的患者均有效。