• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雾化吸入磷霉素和阿米卡星对中空纤维感染模型中铜绿假单胞菌和肺炎克雷伯菌耐药临床分离株的药效学:联合治疗的实验依据

Pharmacodynamics of Aerosolized Fosfomycin and Amikacin against Resistant Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model: Experimental Basis for Combination Therapy.

作者信息

Sime Fekade Bruck, Johnson Adam, Whalley Sarah, Santoyo-Castelazo Anahi, Montgomery A Bruce, Walters Kathie Ann, Lipman Jeffrey, Hope William W, Roberts Jason A

机构信息

Centre for Translational Anti-infective Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Burns, Trauma and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Dec 27;61(1). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01763-16. Print 2017 Jan.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.01763-16
PMID:27795380
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5192115/
Abstract

There has been a resurgence of interest in aerosolization of antibiotics for treatment of patients with severe pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens. A combination formulation of amikacin-fosfomycin is currently undergoing clinical testing although the exposure-response relationships of these drugs have not been fully characterized. The aim of this study was to describe the individual and combined antibacterial effects of simulated epithelial lining fluid exposures of aerosolized amikacin and fosfomycin against resistant clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MICs of 16 mg/liter and 64 mg/liter) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (MICs of 2 mg/liter and 64 mg/liter) using a dynamic hollow-fiber infection model over 7 days. Targeted peak concentrations of 300 mg/liter amikacin and/or 1,200 mg/liter fosfomycin as a 12-hourly dosing regimens were used. Quantitative cultures were performed to describe changes in concentrations of the total and resistant bacterial populations. The targeted starting inoculum was 10 CFU/ml for both strains. We observed that neither amikacin nor fosfomycin monotherapy was bactericidal against P. aeruginosa while both were associated with rapid amplification of resistant P. aeruginosa strains (about 10 to 10 CFU/ml within 24 to 48 h). For K. pneumoniae, amikacin but not fosfomycin was bactericidal. When both drugs were combined, a rapid killing was observed for P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae (6-log kill within 24 h). Furthermore, the combination of amikacin and fosfomycin effectively suppressed growth of resistant strains of P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae In conclusion, the combination of amikacin and fosfomycin was effective at maximizing bacterial killing and suppressing emergence of resistance against these clinical isolates.

摘要

对于使用抗生素雾化治疗由多重耐药病原体引起的严重肺炎患者,人们重新产生了兴趣。虽然阿米卡星 - 磷霉素的联合制剂目前正在进行临床试验,但这些药物的暴露 - 反应关系尚未完全明确。本研究的目的是使用动态中空纤维感染模型,描述雾化的阿米卡星和磷霉素模拟上皮衬液暴露对铜绿假单胞菌(最低抑菌浓度分别为16毫克/升和64毫克/升)和肺炎克雷伯菌(最低抑菌浓度分别为2毫克/升和64毫克/升)的耐药临床分离株在7天内的单独及联合抗菌作用。采用每12小时给药方案,使阿米卡星的目标峰值浓度达到300毫克/升和/或磷霉素达到1200毫克/升。进行定量培养以描述总细菌群体和耐药细菌群体浓度的变化。两种菌株的目标起始接种量均为10 CFU/ml。我们观察到,阿米卡星和磷霉素单药治疗对铜绿假单胞菌均无杀菌作用,同时两者都与耐药铜绿假单胞菌菌株的快速扩增有关(在24至48小时内约为10⁶至10⁷ CFU/ml)。对于肺炎克雷伯菌,阿米卡星有杀菌作用,而磷霉素没有。当两种药物联合使用时,观察到对铜绿假单胞菌和肺炎克雷伯菌有快速杀菌作用(24小时内杀灭6个对数级)。此外,阿米卡星和磷霉素的组合有效地抑制了铜绿假单胞菌和肺炎克雷伯菌耐药菌株的生长。总之,阿米卡星和磷霉素的组合在最大限度地杀灭细菌和抑制对这些临床分离株的耐药性出现方面是有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d5d/5192115/cdd34212214f/zac0011758010005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d5d/5192115/c2c441286123/zac0011758010001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d5d/5192115/ceb61280cc89/zac0011758010002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d5d/5192115/d3c3ed8aa373/zac0011758010003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d5d/5192115/7fb1c626d59d/zac0011758010004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d5d/5192115/cdd34212214f/zac0011758010005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d5d/5192115/c2c441286123/zac0011758010001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d5d/5192115/ceb61280cc89/zac0011758010002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d5d/5192115/d3c3ed8aa373/zac0011758010003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d5d/5192115/7fb1c626d59d/zac0011758010004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4d5d/5192115/cdd34212214f/zac0011758010005.jpg

相似文献

1
Pharmacodynamics of Aerosolized Fosfomycin and Amikacin against Resistant Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model: Experimental Basis for Combination Therapy.雾化吸入磷霉素和阿米卡星对中空纤维感染模型中铜绿假单胞菌和肺炎克雷伯菌耐药临床分离株的药效学:联合治疗的实验依据
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Dec 27;61(1). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01763-16. Print 2017 Jan.
2
Evaluation of the Synergy of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Combination with Meropenem, Amikacin, Aztreonam, Colistin, or Fosfomycin against Well-Characterized Multidrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.评价头孢他啶-阿维巴坦与美罗培南、阿米卡星、氨曲南、黏菌素或磷霉素联合使用对经过充分特征鉴定的多药耐药肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌的协同作用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Jul 25;63(8). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00779-19. Print 2019 Aug.
3
Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Evaluation of Fosfomycin Combined with Amikacin or Colistin against KPC2-Producing .磷霉素联合阿米卡星或黏菌素对产KPC2菌株的药代动力学/药效学评价
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 Jun 16;7:246. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00246. eCollection 2017.
4
Antibacterial Activity of Human Simulated Epithelial Lining Fluid Concentrations of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Alone or in Combination with Amikacin Inhale (BAY41-6551) against Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae.头孢他啶-阿维巴坦单用或联合阿米卡星吸入(BAY41-6551)对人模拟上皮衬液浓度下的耐碳青霉烯铜绿假单胞菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的抗菌活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jun 26;62(7). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00113-18. Print 2018 Jul.
5
Pharmacodynamics of once- versus twice-daily dosing of nebulized amikacin in an in vitro Hollow-Fiber Infection Model against 3 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.雾化阿米卡星每日一次与每日两次给药在体外中空纤维感染模型中对 3 株铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株的药效学比较。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jun;100(2):115329. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115329. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
6
Potentiation effects of amikacin and fosfomycin against selected amikacin-nonsusceptible Gram-negative respiratory tract pathogens.阿米卡星与磷霉素对部分耐阿米卡星革兰阴性呼吸道病原体的增效作用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014 Jul;58(7):3714-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02780-13. Epub 2014 Apr 21.
7
Antibacterial activity of achievable epithelial lining fluid exposures of Amikacin Inhale with or without meropenem.阿米卡星吸入剂(无论有无美罗培南)可达到的上皮衬液暴露量的抗菌活性。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Feb;71(2):428-37. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv370. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
8
Evaluation of Activity and Emergence of Resistance of Polymyxin B and ZTI-01 (Fosfomycin for Injection) against KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.多黏菌素 B 和 ZTI-01(注射用磷霉素)对产 KPC 肺炎克雷伯菌的活性和耐药性的评估。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jan 25;62(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01815-17. Print 2018 Feb.
9
Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Plasma and Epithelial Lining Fluid Exposures of Amikacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Dynamic Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.在动态中空纤维感染模型中评估阿米卡星对铜绿假单胞菌的血浆和上皮衬液暴露的药效学。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020 Aug 20;64(9). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00879-20.
10
The Combination of Fosfomycin plus Meropenem Is Synergistic for Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 in a Hollow-Fiber Infection Model.磷霉素与美罗培南联合使用对绿脓假单胞菌 PAO1 在中空纤维感染模型中具有协同作用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Nov 26;62(12). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01682-18. Print 2018 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Fluoroquinolone resistance in urinary tract infections: Epidemiology, mechanisms of action and management strategies.尿路感染中的氟喹诺酮耐药性:流行病学、作用机制及管理策略
BJUI Compass. 2023 Aug 31;5(1):5-11. doi: 10.1002/bco2.286. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Pharmacodynamic evaluation of piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and non-producing Escherichia coli clinical isolates in a hollow-fibre infection model.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与美罗培南对中空纤维感染模型中产与不产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠埃希菌临床分离株的药效学评价。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Aug 25;77(9):2448-2455. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac186.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics of an ideal nebulized antibiotic for the treatment of pneumonia in the intubated patient.用于治疗气管插管患者肺炎的理想雾化抗生素的特性。
Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0140-x. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
2
In vitro pharmacodynamics of fosfomycin against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.磷霉素对铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株的体外药效学
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Nov;70(11):3042-50. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv221. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
3
Pharmacodynamics of fosfomycin: insights into clinical use for antimicrobial resistance.
Pharmacodynamics of Linezolid Plus Fosfomycin Against Vancomycin-Resistant in a Hollow Fiber Infection Model.
利奈唑胺联合磷霉素对万古霉素耐药菌在中空纤维感染模型中的药效学研究
Front Microbiol. 2021 Dec 14;12:779885. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.779885. eCollection 2021.
4
Predicting Antimicrobial Activity at the Target Site: Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Indices versus Time-Kill Approaches.预测靶部位的抗菌活性:药代动力学/药效学指标与时间杀菌法
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Dec 4;10(12):1485. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10121485.
5
Activity of fosfomycin and amikacin against fosfomycin-heteroresistant strains in a infection model.磷霉素和阿米卡星在感染模型中对磷霉素异质性耐药菌株的活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 May 1;65(5). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02213-20. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
6
Epidemiology and Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections.多重耐药和广泛耐药铜绿假单胞菌感染的流行病学和治疗。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 Aug 28;32(4). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00031-19. Print 2019 Sep 18.
7
In vitro antibacterial effect of fosfomycin combination therapy against colistin-resistant .磷霉素联合疗法对耐黏菌素菌的体外抗菌作用
Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Apr 24;11:577-585. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S160474. eCollection 2018.
8
Individualising Therapy to Minimize Bacterial Multidrug Resistance.个体化治疗以最小化细菌的多重耐药性。
Drugs. 2018 Apr;78(6):621-641. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0891-9.
9
Amikacin: Uses, Resistance, and Prospects for Inhibition.阿米卡星:用途、耐药性和抑制前景。
Molecules. 2017 Dec 19;22(12):2267. doi: 10.3390/molecules22122267.
10
Evaluation of Activity and Emergence of Resistance of Polymyxin B and ZTI-01 (Fosfomycin for Injection) against KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.多黏菌素 B 和 ZTI-01(注射用磷霉素)对产 KPC 肺炎克雷伯菌的活性和耐药性的评估。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jan 25;62(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01815-17. Print 2018 Feb.
磷霉素的药效学:对抗菌药物耐药性临床应用的见解
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Sep;59(9):5602-10. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00752-15. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
4
Inhaled antibiotics for lower airway infections.吸入性抗生素用于下呼吸道感染。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Mar;11(3):425-34. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201311-395FR.
5
A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled dose-escalation phase 1 study of aerosolized amikacin and fosfomycin delivered via the PARI investigational eFlow® inline nebulizer system in mechanically ventilated patients.一项在机械通气患者中进行的随机双盲安慰剂对照剂量递增1期研究,通过PARI investigational eFlow®在线雾化器系统给予雾化阿米卡星和磷霉素。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2014 Dec;27(6):441-8. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2013.1100.
6
Aerosolized antibiotics: do they add to the treatment of pneumonia?雾化抗生素:它们能治疗肺炎吗?
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;26(6):538-44. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000004.
7
What is the relevance of fosfomycin pharmacokinetics in the treatment of serious infections in critically ill patients? A systematic review.磷霉素药代动力学在治疗危重症患者严重感染中的相关性如何?系统评价。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013 Oct;42(4):289-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.05.018. Epub 2013 Jul 20.
8
Influence of sepsis on higher daily dose of amikacin pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients.脓毒症对危重症患者更高日剂量阿米卡星药代动力学的影响。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013 Feb;17(3):285-91.
9
Fosfomycin enhances the active transport of tobramycin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.磷霉素增强铜绿假单胞菌对妥布霉素的主动转运。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Mar;56(3):1529-38. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05958-11. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
10
BAY41-6551 achieves bactericidal tracheal aspirate amikacin concentrations in mechanically ventilated patients with Gram-negative pneumonia.BAY41-6551 可实现机械通气革兰氏阴性菌肺炎患者的杀菌性气管抽吸阿米卡星浓度。
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Feb;38(2):263-71. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2420-0. Epub 2011 Dec 7.