Zonszein Joel, Groop Per-Henrik
Montefiore Medical Center, University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Abdominal Center Nephrology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Diabetes Ther. 2016 Dec;7(4):621-639. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0208-5. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
The duration of uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) can adversely impact small and large vessels, eventually leading to microvascular and macrovascular complications. Failure of therapeutic lifestyle changes, monotherapy, and clinical inertia contribute to persistent hyperglycemia and disease progression. The aim was to review the complex pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes and how different oral agents can be used effectively as first-line therapy in combination with metformin, as well as in patients not achieving glycemic goals with metformin therapy.
For this review, a non-systematic literature search of PubMed, NCBI, and Google Scholar was conducted.
New oral agents have made it possible to improve glycemic control to near-normal levels with a low risk of hypoglycemia and without weight gain, and sometimes with weight loss. Early combination therapy is effective and has been shown to have a favorable legacy effect. A number of agents are available in a single-pill combination (SPC) that provides fewer pills and better adherence. Compared with adding a sulfonylurea, still the most common oral combination used, empagliflozin has been shown to decrease cardiovascular (CV) events in a dedicated CV outcome study, and pioglitazone has been effective in reducing the risk of secondary CV endpoints, whereas sulfonylureas have been associated with an increased risk of CV disease. In those failing metformin, triple oral therapy by adding a non-metformin SPC such as empagliflozin/linagliptin or pioglitazone/alogliptin is a good option for reducing glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) without significant hypoglycemia.
Clinicians have a comprehensive armamentarium of medications to treat patients with T2DM. Clinical evidence has shown that dual or triple oral combination therapy is effective for glycemic control, and early treatment is effective in getting patients to goal more quickly. Use of SPCs is an option for double or triple oral combination therapy and may result in better adherence.
2型糖尿病(T2DM)未得到控制的持续时间会对小血管和大血管产生不利影响,最终导致微血管和大血管并发症。治疗性生活方式改变、单药治疗失败以及临床惰性会导致持续性高血糖和疾病进展。目的是回顾2型糖尿病的复杂病理生理学,以及不同口服药物如何与二甲双胍联合有效地用作一线治疗,以及在二甲双胍治疗未达到血糖目标的患者中如何使用。
本次综述对PubMed、NCBI和谷歌学术进行了非系统性文献检索。
新型口服药物已使血糖控制改善至接近正常水平成为可能,低血糖风险低且无体重增加,有时还伴有体重减轻。早期联合治疗有效,并且已显示具有良好的遗留效应。有多种药物以单片复方制剂(SPC)形式提供,服用的药片更少且依从性更好。与添加磺脲类药物(仍是最常用的口服联合用药)相比,在一项专门的心血管结局研究中,恩格列净已显示可降低心血管(CV)事件,吡格列酮在降低次要CV终点风险方面有效,而磺脲类药物与CV疾病风险增加有关。在二甲双胍治疗失败的患者中,添加非二甲双胍SPC(如恩格列净/利格列汀或吡格列酮/阿格列汀)进行三联口服治疗是降低糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)且无明显低血糖的良好选择。
临床医生有一套全面的药物来治疗T2DM患者。临床证据表明,双联或三联口服联合治疗对血糖控制有效,早期治疗能使患者更快达到目标。使用SPC是双联或三联口服联合治疗的一种选择,可能会带来更好的依从性。