Seggelke Stacey A, Lindsay Mark C, Hazlett Ingrid, Sanagorski Rebecca, Eckel Robert H, Low Wang Cecilia C
Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Diabetes, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, MS8106, RC-1 South, Room 7103, 12801 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Curr Diab Rep. 2017 Aug;17(8):64. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0884-1.
Patients with diabetes and/or stress hyperglycemia requires good glycemic control in the hospital setting, often requiring the use of glucose-lowering therapy. Standard-of-care dictates that non-insulin therapy be discontinued, with insulin therapy initiated using a basal-bolus approach. However, insulin is associated with a high risk for hypoglycemia and medical errors. Alternatives to insulin are needed in the inpatient setting, but the cardiovascular (CV) safety of non-insulin therapy is a concern.
Most studies of antidiabetic drugs have been performed in the outpatient setting, and except for insulin therapy, trials in the inpatient setting have been insufficient to establish CV safety. Randomized controlled trials support the safety of insulin with more moderate glycemic control in the hospital, when hypoglycemia is minimized. Two recent multicenter randomized controlled clinical trials support the safety of sitagliptin, a dipeptidylpeptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i), in hospitalized patients, although the sample sizes were likely too small to detect CV events. Small trials suggest a possible CV benefit of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy. A paucity of evidence and presence of side effects and cautions with insulin secretagogues, sodium glucose-co-transporter-2 inhibitors, and metformin preclude their routine use in the hospital setting. Available evidence is inadequate to evaluate the CV safety of most antidiabetic drug classes in the hospital setting. However, preliminary data from randomized clinical trials suggest the potential safety of the DPP4i sitagliptin.
糖尿病和/或应激性高血糖患者在医院环境中需要良好的血糖控制,通常需要使用降糖治疗。护理标准规定应停用非胰岛素治疗,并采用基础-餐时胰岛素治疗方案开始胰岛素治疗。然而,胰岛素与低血糖和医疗差错的高风险相关。住院患者需要胰岛素的替代药物,但非胰岛素治疗的心血管(CV)安全性是一个问题。
大多数抗糖尿病药物的研究是在门诊环境中进行的,除胰岛素治疗外,住院环境中的试验不足以确定CV安全性。随机对照试验支持在医院中采用更适度的血糖控制时胰岛素的安全性,此时低血糖风险降至最低。最近两项多中心随机对照临床试验支持二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP4i)西格列汀在住院患者中的安全性,尽管样本量可能太小,无法检测到CV事件。小型试验表明胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂治疗可能对CV有益。由于缺乏证据以及胰岛素促分泌剂、钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2抑制剂和二甲双胍存在副作用及注意事项,因此不建议在医院环境中常规使用。现有证据不足以评估大多数抗糖尿病药物在医院环境中的CV安全性。然而,随机临床试验的初步数据表明DPP4i西格列汀具有潜在安全性。