• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非心脏手术后医生患者的结局:一项登记分析。

Outcomes of physician patients after non-cardiac surgery: a registry analysis.

作者信息

Panjasawatwong Krit, Lin Peirong, Karimi Nika, You Jing, Sessler Daniel I

机构信息

Department of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave P77, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

Departments of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave P77, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.

出版信息

J Anesth. 2017 Feb;31(1):111-119. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2273-3. Epub 2016 Oct 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00540-016-2273-3
PMID:27798750
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

When physicians become patients, they may expect special privileges, extra attention from caregivers, and non-routine treatments. Consequently, physician patients may not be treated per routine-which possibly worsens care rather than improving it. We thus tested the primary hypothesis that in-hospital mortality and major complications after non-cardiac surgery are more common in physician patients than in non-physician patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Perioperative data were extracted for patients who had non-cardiac surgery at the Cleveland Clinic between 2005 and 2013. We used propensity score matching to identify comparable groups of physician and non-physician patients. Matched physician and non-physician patients were compared on a composite of in-hospital mortality and major postoperative complications using a generalized equation average relative effects model. Secondly, the matched patients were also compared on reoperation using logistic regression and on duration of hospitalization using Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

Among 21,173 qualifying patients, we matched 522 physician patients to 2448 non-physician controls. There were no significant differences between physician and non-physician patients in the composite of in-hospital mortality and major complications, with an estimated odds ratio across the outcome components (average relative effect) of 1.20 (95% confidence interval 0.77-1.87) for physicians vs. non-physicians, P = 0.41. There was also no difference in the risk of re-operation or duration of hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

A variety of important outcomes were similar in physician patients and matched non-physician patients after non-cardiac surgery.

摘要

目的

当医生成为患者时,他们可能期望获得特殊待遇、护理人员给予额外关注以及接受非常规治疗。因此,医生患者可能不会按照常规方式接受治疗,这可能会使护理质量恶化而非改善。因此,我们检验了主要假设,即非心脏手术后住院死亡率和主要并发症在医生患者中比在非医生患者中更常见。

患者与方法

提取了2005年至2013年在克利夫兰诊所接受非心脏手术患者的围手术期数据。我们使用倾向评分匹配来确定医生患者和非医生患者的可比组。使用广义方程平均相对效应模型,对匹配的医生患者和非医生患者在住院死亡率和主要术后并发症的综合情况进行比较。其次,还使用逻辑回归对匹配患者的再次手术情况进行比较,并使用对数秩检验和Cox比例风险回归的Kaplan-Meier分析对住院时间进行比较。

结果

在21173名符合条件的患者中,我们将522名医生患者与2448名非医生对照进行了匹配。医生患者和非医生患者在住院死亡率和主要并发症的综合情况方面没有显著差异,医生与非医生在各个结局指标上的估计比值比(平均相对效应)为1.20(95%置信区间0.77 - 1.87),P = 0.41。再次手术风险或住院时间也没有差异。

结论

非心脏手术后,医生患者和匹配的非医生患者在各种重要结局方面相似。

相似文献

1
Outcomes of physician patients after non-cardiac surgery: a registry analysis.非心脏手术后医生患者的结局:一项登记分析。
J Anesth. 2017 Feb;31(1):111-119. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2273-3. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
2
The effect of the Cox-maze procedure for atrial fibrillation concomitant to mitral and tricuspid valve surgery.心脏迷宫术治疗合并二尖瓣和三尖瓣手术的心房颤动的效果。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Dec;146(6):1426-34; discussion 1434-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
3
Steroid administration after anaesthetic induction with etomidate does not reduce in-hospital mortality or cardiovascular morbidity after non-cardiac surgery.在依托咪酯诱导麻醉后给予类固醇治疗不会降低非心脏手术后的住院死亡率或心血管发病率。
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Mar;120(3):501-508. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.079. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
4
Postoperative adverse outcomes among physicians receiving major surgeries: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.接受大手术的医生术后不良结局:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(39):e4946. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004946.
5
Outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair conversion and primary aortic repair for urgent and emergency indications in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.血管外科学会血管质量改进项目中,血管内动脉瘤修复术转换及原发性主动脉修复术治疗紧急和急诊指征后的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Aug;64(2):338-347. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
6
Does payer status impact clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery? A propensity analysis.支付者状态是否会影响心脏手术后的临床结果?一项倾向分析。
Heart Surg Forum. 2012 Oct;15(5):E262-7. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20111163.
7
Provider volume and short-term outcomes following surgery for spinal metastases.脊柱转移瘤手术后的医疗服务量与短期预后
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Feb;24:43-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
8
Does the presence of an emergency physician influence pre-hospital time, pre-hospital interventions and the mortality of severely injured patients? A matched-pair analysis based on the trauma registry of the German Trauma Society (TraumaRegister DGU).急诊医生的在场是否会影响重伤患者的院前时间、院前干预措施及死亡率?基于德国创伤学会创伤登记处(TraumaRegister DGU)的配对分析。
Injury. 2017 Jan;48(1):32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.08.015. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
9
Preoperative β-blocker use in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: national database analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术中术前β受体阻滞剂的使用:国家数据库分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1320-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2356.
10
Combined Epidural-General Anesthesia vs General Anesthesia Alone for Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.硬膜外联合全身麻醉与单纯全身麻醉用于择期腹主动脉瘤修复。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Dec 1;151(12):1116-1123. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2733.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcome disparities between medical personnel and nonmedical personnel patients receiving definitive surgery for colorectal cancer: a nationwide population-based study.接受结直肠癌根治性手术的医务人员患者与非医务人员患者的结局差异:一项基于全国人口的研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jan;94(4):e402. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000402.
2
Do physicians have lower risk of severe sepsis and associated mortality? A matched cohort study*.医生罹患严重脓毒症及其相关死亡率的风险是否更低?一项匹配队列研究*。
Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):816-23. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000033.
3
A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score.
匹配倾向评分的 12 种算法比较。
Stat Med. 2014 Mar 15;33(6):1057-69. doi: 10.1002/sim.6004. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
4
The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.不同倾向评分方法估计边缘风险比的性能。
Stat Med. 2013 Jul 20;32(16):2837-49. doi: 10.1002/sim.5705. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
5
The physician-administrator as patient: distinctive aspects of medical care.作为患者的医生管理者:医疗护理的独特方面。
Perspect Biol Med. 2011 Spring;54(2):232-42. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2011.0021.
6
Caring for VIPs: nine principles.关爱 VIP:九条原则。
Cleve Clin J Med. 2011 Feb;78(2):90-4. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.78a.10113.
7
Factors affecting power of tests for multiple binary outcomes.影响多项二分类结局检验效能的因素。
Stat Med. 2010 Dec 10;29(28):2890-904. doi: 10.1002/sim.4066.
8
Comparison of perforation risk among physicians, other medical professionals and general adults with acute appendicitis in Taiwan.台湾地区医师、其他医学专业人员及急性阑尾炎成年普通人群穿孔风险的比较。
Br J Surg. 2006 Oct;93(10):1297-302. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5435.
9
Celebrity Patients, VIPs, and Potentates.名人患者、贵宾和权贵。
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;4(6):215-223. doi: 10.4088/pcc.v04n0602.
10
"THE VIP SYNDROME": A CLINICAL STUDY IN HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY.“贵宾综合征”:医院精神病学的一项临床研究
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1964 Feb;138:181-93.