• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验通常对患者和医院都有益。

Clinical trials are usually beneficial to patients and hospitals.

作者信息

Morris W T, Lamb A M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Auckland School of Medicine.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 1989 Sep 13;102(875):472-4.

PMID:2779901
Abstract

We examined the cost of antibiotics used prophylactically in the first 25 patients in a controlled clinical trial comparing different antibiotic regimens in the prophylaxis of sepsis. We compared this with the costs of prophylaxis in 25 similar patients immediately before the trial started and found that the costs in the pretrial patients were significantly greater than in the trial patients. The trial is therefore beneficial to the hospital. We also examined the dispensing errors in the same patients. We found none in the trial patients but there were 77 out of 627 doses prescribed in the pretrial patients. We concluded that the abolition of dispensing errors brought about by the trial must be beneficial to the patients. They were also benefitted by the close monitoring which reveals complications at an early stage, and the improved case notes. The Hawthorne effect on medical and nursing staff is the most likely cause of these phenomena.

摘要

我们在一项对照临床试验中,对首批25例患者预防性使用抗生素的费用进行了研究,该试验比较了不同抗生素方案预防败血症的效果。我们将此与试验开始前25例类似患者的预防费用进行了比较,发现试验前患者的费用显著高于试验患者。因此,该试验对医院有益。我们还检查了同一批患者的配药错误情况。我们发现试验患者中没有配药错误,但试验前患者所开的627剂药物中有77剂存在配药错误。我们得出结论,试验带来的配药错误的消除肯定对患者有益。患者还受益于密切监测,这种监测能在早期发现并发症,以及改进的病历记录。这些现象最可能的原因是霍桑效应对医护人员产生了影响。

相似文献

1
Clinical trials are usually beneficial to patients and hospitals.临床试验通常对患者和医院都有益。
N Z Med J. 1989 Sep 13;102(875):472-4.
2
[Antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: results of a randomized clinical study].[结直肠手术中的抗生素预防:一项随机临床研究的结果]
Helv Chir Acta. 1982 Aug;49(3-4):527-36.
3
Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute appendicitis.急性阑尾炎的抗生素预防
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983 Feb;156(2):209-11.
4
[The use of antibiotics in surgical prophylaxis. The characteristics and consequences].
Med Clin (Barc). 1993 Mar 20;100(11):404-6.
5
Comparison of ceftriaxone versus triple drug regimen in the prevention of cesarean section infectious morbidities.头孢曲松与三联药物方案预防剖宫产感染性疾病的比较。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2008 Sep;21(9):638-42. doi: 10.1080/14767050802220490.
6
Antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Committee on Antimicrobial Agents, Canadian Infectious Disease Society.手术中的抗菌预防。抗菌药物委员会,加拿大传染病协会。
CMAJ. 1994 Oct 1;151(7):925-31.
7
Metronidazole prophylaxis against wound infection in patients undergoing appendicectomy.
Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1981;70(2):71-4.
8
Failure of topically applied antibiotics, added to systemic prophylaxis, to reduce perineal wound infection in abdominoperineal excision of the rectum.在直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术中,局部应用抗生素并联合全身预防性用药未能降低会阴部伤口感染率。
Acta Chir Scand. 1988 Oct;154(10):589-92.
9
The place of antibiotics in preventing wound infection after clean operations in an Indian hospital: a prospective, randomised, controlled clinical trial.抗生素在印度一家医院清洁手术后预防伤口感染中的作用:一项前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1983 Nov;65(6):400-2.
10
A cost effective approach to surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.一种具有成本效益的外科手术抗生素预防方法。
Can J Hosp Pharm. 1992 Aug;45(4):151-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Does the use of an electronic reminder device with or without counseling improve adherence to lipid-lowering treatment? The results of a randomized controlled trial.使用电子提醒装置(伴或不伴咨询)是否能提高降脂治疗的依从性?一项随机对照试验的结果。
Front Pharmacol. 2013 May 29;4:69. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2013.00069. eCollection 2013.
2
Evidence on interventions to reduce medical errors: an overview and recommendations for future research.减少医疗差错干预措施的证据:概述及对未来研究的建议。
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 May;16(5):325-34. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.00714.x.