Getahun Belete, Wubie Moges, Dejenu Getiye, Manyazewal Tsegahun
Debre Markos University, P.O. Box 269, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Ethiopian Public Health Association, P.O. Box 7117, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Infect Dis Poverty. 2016 Nov 1;5(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s40249-016-0187-9.
While investment in the development of Tuberculosis (TB) treatment strategies is essential, it cannot be assumed that the strategies are affordable for TB patients living in countries with high economic constraints. This study aimed to determine the economic consequences of directly observed therapy for TB patients.
A cross-sectional cost-of-illness analysis was conducted between September to November 2015 among 576 randomly selected adult TB patients who were on directly observed treatment in 27 public health facilities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Data were collected using interviewer-administered questionnaire adapted from the Tool to Estimate Patients' Costs. Mean and median costs, reduction of productivity, and household expenditure of TB patients were calculated and ways of coping costs captured. Eta (η), Odds ratio and p values were used to measure association between variables.
Of the total 576 TB patients enrolled, 43 % were smear-positive pulmonary TB (PTB), 17 % smear-negative PTB, 37 % Extra-PTB and 3 % multi-drug resistant TB cases. Direct (Out-of-Pocket) mean and median costs of TB illness to patients were $123.0 (SD = 58.8) and $125.78 (R = 338.12), respectively, and indirect (loss income) mean and median costs were $54.26 (SD = 43.5) and $44.61 (R = 215.6), respectively. Mean and median total cost of TB illness to patient were $177.3 (SD = 78.7) and $177.1 (R = 461.8), respectively. The total cost had significant association with patient's household income, residence, need for additional food, and primary income (P <0.05). Direct costs were catastrophic for 63 % of TB patients, regardless of significant difference between gender (P = 0.92) and type of TB cases (P = 0.37). TB patients mean productivity and income reduced by 37 and 10 %, respectively, compared with pre-treatment level, while mean household expenditure increased by 33 % and working hours reduced by 78 % due to TB illness. Income quartile categories were directly correlated with catastrophic costs (η = 0.684).
Despite the availability of free-of-charge anti-TB drugs, TB patients were suffering from out-of-pocket payments with catastrophic consequences, which in turn were hampering the efforts to end TB. TB patients in resource-limited countries deserve integrated patient-centered care with comprehensive health insurance coverage, financial incentives, and nutrition support to reduce catastrophic costs and retain them in care. Such countries should induce home-based directly observed therapy programs to reduce costs due to attending health facilities, intensify home treatment of critically-ill patients with impaired mobility, and reduce the spread of TB due to patients traveling to seek care.
虽然投资于结核病(TB)治疗策略的开发至关重要,但不能假定这些策略对于生活在经济高度受限国家的结核病患者来说是可承受的。本研究旨在确定对结核病患者进行直接观察治疗的经济后果。
2015年9月至11月间,在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴的27个公共卫生设施中,对576名随机选取的正在接受直接观察治疗的成年结核病患者进行了横断面疾病成本分析。使用从《患者成本估算工具》改编而来的访谈式问卷收集数据。计算了结核病患者的平均和中位数成本、生产力降低情况以及家庭支出,并记录了应对成本的方式。使用埃塔(η)、优势比和p值来衡量变量之间的关联。
在总共纳入的576名结核病患者中,43%为涂片阳性肺结核(PTB),17%为涂片阴性PTB,37%为肺外结核病,3%为耐多药结核病病例。结核病给患者带来的直接(自付)平均和中位数成本分别为123.0美元(标准差=58.8)和125.78美元(极差=338.12),间接(收入损失)平均和中位数成本分别为54.26美元(标准差=43.5)和44.61美元(极差=215.6)。结核病给患者带来的平均和中位数总成本分别为177.3美元(标准差=78.7)和177.1美元(极差=461.8)。总成本与患者的家庭收入、居住地、额外食物需求和主要收入之间存在显著关联(P<0.05)。无论性别(P=0.92)和结核病病例类型(P=0.37)之间有无显著差异,63%的结核病患者的直接成本都具有灾难性。与治疗前水平相比,结核病患者的平均生产力和收入分别降低了37%和10%,而由于结核病,家庭平均支出增加了33%,工作时间减少了78%。收入四分位数类别与灾难性成本直接相关(η=0.684)。
尽管有免费的抗结核药物,但结核病患者仍需自掏腰包支付费用,这带来了灾难性后果,进而阻碍了终结结核病的努力。资源有限国家的结核病患者应获得以患者为中心的综合护理,包括全面的医疗保险覆盖、经济激励和营养支持,以降低灾难性成本并使他们坚持接受治疗。这些国家应推行居家直接观察治疗项目,以降低因前往医疗机构而产生的成本,加强对行动不便的重症患者的居家治疗,并减少患者前往就医导致的结核病传播。