Suppr超能文献

做出转变:用于脂肪来源基质细胞扩增的胎牛血清替代品

Making the Switch: Alternatives to Fetal Bovine Serum for Adipose-Derived Stromal Cell Expansion.

作者信息

Dessels Carla, Potgieter Marnie, Pepper Michael S

机构信息

South African Medical Research Council, Extramural Unit for Stem Cell Research and Therapy, and Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Pretoria Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

Front Cell Dev Biol. 2016 Oct 17;4:115. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2016.00115. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) are being used extensively in clinical trials. These trials require that ASCs are prepared using good manufacturing practices (GMPs) and are safe for use in humans. The majority of clinical trials in which ASCs are expanded make use of fetal bovine serum (FBS). While FBS is used traditionally in the research setting for expansion, it does carry the risk of xenoimmunization and zoonotic transmission when used for expanding cells destined for therapeutic purposes. In order to ensure a GMP quality product for cellular therapy, expansion of ASCs has been undertaken using xeno-free (XF), chemically-defined, and human blood-derived alternatives. These investigations usually include the criteria proposed by the International Society of Cellular Therapy (ISCT) and International Fat Applied Technology Society (IFATS). The majority of studies use these criteria to compare plastic-adherence, morphology, the immunophenotype and the trilineage differentiation of ASCs under the different medium supplemented conditions. Based on these studies, all of the alternatives to FBS seem to be suitable replacements; however, each has its own advantages and drawbacks. Very few studies have investigated the effects of the supplements on the immunomodulation of ASCs; the transcriptome, proteome and secretome; and the ultimate effects in appropriate animal models. The selection of medium supplementation will depend on the downstream application of the ASCs and their efficacy and safety in preclinical studies.

摘要

脂肪来源的基质细胞(ASCs)正在广泛应用于临床试验。这些试验要求使用良好生产规范(GMP)制备ASCs,并且其用于人体时是安全的。大多数ASCs扩增的临床试验使用胎牛血清(FBS)。虽然FBS传统上用于研究环境中的扩增,但当用于扩增用于治疗目的的细胞时,它确实存在异种免疫和人畜共患病传播的风险。为了确保细胞治疗的GMP质量产品,已使用无动物源(XF)、化学成分明确的和人血来源的替代品进行ASCs的扩增。这些研究通常包括国际细胞治疗协会(ISCT)和国际脂肪应用技术协会(IFATS)提出的标准。大多数研究使用这些标准来比较在不同培养基补充条件下ASCs的塑料贴壁、形态、免疫表型和三系分化。基于这些研究,所有FBS的替代品似乎都是合适的替代物;然而,每种都有其自身的优缺点。很少有研究调查这些补充剂对ASCs免疫调节、转录组、蛋白质组和分泌组的影响,以及在合适动物模型中的最终效果。培养基补充剂的选择将取决于ASCs的下游应用及其在临床前研究中的功效和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcb3/5065960/0d09b34821de/fcell-04-00115-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验