Zhang Yufeng, Hood Wendy R
Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.
Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
J Exp Biol. 2016 Oct 15;219(Pt 20):3177-3189. doi: 10.1242/jeb.132183.
Oxidative damage is predicted to be a mediator of trade-offs between current reproduction and future reproduction or survival, but most studies fail to support such predictions. We suggest that two factors underlie the equivocal nature of these findings: (1) investigators typically assume a negative linear relationship between current reproduction and future reproduction or survival, even though this is not consistently shown by empirical studies; and (2) studies often fail to target mechanisms that could link interactions between sequential life-history events. Here, we review common patterns of reproduction, focusing on the relationships between reproductive performance, survival and parity in females. Observations in a range of species show that performance between sequential reproductive events can decline, remain consistent or increase. We describe likely bioenergetic consequences of reproduction that could underlie these changes in fitness, including mechanisms that could be responsible for negative effects being ephemeral, persistent or delayed. Finally, we make recommendations for designing future studies. We encourage investigators to carefully consider additional or alternative measures of bioenergetic function in studies of life-history trade-offs. Such measures include reactive oxygen species production, oxidative repair, mitochondrial biogenesis, cell proliferation, mitochondrial DNA mutation and replication error and, importantly, a measure of the respiratory function to determine whether measured differences in bioenergetic state are associated with a change in the energetic capacity of tissues that could feasibly affect future reproduction or lifespan. More careful consideration of the life-history context and bioenergetic variables will improve our understanding of the mechanisms that underlie the life-history patterns of animals.
氧化损伤被认为是当前繁殖与未来繁殖或生存之间权衡的一个中介因素,但大多数研究未能支持此类预测。我们认为,这些研究结果模棱两可的性质有两个潜在因素:(1)研究人员通常假定当前繁殖与未来繁殖或生存之间存在负线性关系,尽管实证研究并未始终证明这一点;(2)研究往往未能针对可能联系连续生活史事件之间相互作用的机制。在此,我们回顾繁殖的常见模式,重点关注雌性动物的繁殖性能、生存与产次之间的关系。对一系列物种的观察表明,连续繁殖事件之间的性能可能会下降、保持一致或提高。我们描述了繁殖可能产生的生物能量后果,这些后果可能是这些适应性变化的基础,包括可能导致负面影响短暂、持续或延迟的机制。最后,我们对设计未来研究提出建议。我们鼓励研究人员在生活史权衡研究中仔细考虑生物能量功能的其他或替代测量方法。这些测量方法包括活性氧产生、氧化修复、线粒体生物发生、细胞增殖、线粒体DNA突变和复制错误,重要的是,测量呼吸功能以确定生物能量状态的测量差异是否与组织能量能力的变化相关,而这种变化可能切实影响未来繁殖或寿命。对生活史背景和生物能量变量进行更仔细的考虑,将增进我们对动物生活史模式背后机制的理解。