Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Public Health, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 2;6:36155. doi: 10.1038/srep36155.
Previous genome-wide association studies using P-values to select single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have suffered from high false-positive and false-negative results. This case-control study recruited 713 late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) cases and controls aged ≥65 from three teaching hospitals in northern Taiwan from 2007 to 2010. Performance metrics were used to select SNPs in stage 1, which were then genotyped to another dataset (stage 2). Four SNPs (CPXM2 rs2362967, APOC1 rs4420638, ZNF521 rs7230380, and rs12965520) were identified for LOAD by both traditional P-values (without correcting for multiple tests) and performance metrics. After correction for multiple tests, no SNPs were identified by traditional P-values. Simultaneous testing of APOE e4 and APOC1 rs4420638 (the SNP with the best performance in the performance metrics) significantly improved the low sensitivity of APOE e4 from 0.50 to 0.78. A point-based genetic model including these 2 SNPs and important covariates was constructed. Compared with elders with low-risks score (0-6), elders belonging to moderate-risk (score = 7-11) and high-risk (score = 12-18) groups showed a significantly increased risk of LOAD (adjusted odds ratio = 7.80 and 46.93, respectively; P < 0.0001). Performance metrics allow for identification of markers with moderate effect and are useful for creating genetic tests with clinical and public health implications.
先前使用 P 值选择单核苷酸多态性 (SNP) 的全基因组关联研究存在高假阳性和假阴性结果。本病例对照研究于 2007 年至 2010 年从台湾北部三家教学医院招募了 713 名≥65 岁的迟发性阿尔茨海默病 (LOAD) 病例和对照。使用性能指标在第一阶段选择 SNP,然后对另一数据集(第二阶段)进行基因分型。通过传统 P 值(未校正多重检验)和性能指标鉴定了四个与 LOAD 相关的 SNP(CPXM2 rs2362967、APOC1 rs4420638、ZNF521 rs7230380 和 rs12965520)。校正多重检验后,传统 P 值未鉴定出任何 SNP。APOE e4 和 APOC1 rs4420638(性能指标中表现最佳的 SNP)的同时检测显著提高了 APOE e4 的低灵敏度,从 0.50 提高到 0.78。构建了一个基于点的遗传模型,该模型包括这两个 SNP 和重要的协变量。与低风险评分(0-6)的老年人相比,属于中风险(评分=7-11)和高风险(评分=12-18)组的老年人 LOAD 的风险显著增加(校正比值比分别为 7.80 和 46.93;P<0.0001)。性能指标允许鉴定具有中等效应的标记物,对于创建具有临床和公共卫生意义的遗传检测非常有用。