Tsypes Aliona, Owens Max, Hajcak Greg, Gibb Brandon E
Department of Psychology, Binghamton University-State University of New York.
Owens, Department of Psychology, University of South Florida.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Feb;126(2):237-243. doi: 10.1037/abn0000237. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 126(2) of (see record 2016-56318-001). In the article, Figure 1 had incorrect axis labels. There was also an error in the abstract, which did not state that ΔFN was calculated as FN to losses minus FN to gains. All versions of this article have been corrected.] Suicidal behavior aggregates within families, yet the specific mechanisms of suicide-risk transmission are poorly understood. Despite some evidence that abnormal patterns of reward responsiveness might constitute one such potential mechanism, empirical evidence is lacking. The goal of this study was to examine neural responses to gains and losses in children of suicide attempters with no personal history of suicide attempt (SA) themselves. To objectively assess these neural responses, we used feedback negativity (FN), a psychophysiological marker of responsiveness to reward and loss. Participants were 66 parents and their 7-11-year-old children (22 with parental history of SA and 44 demographically and clinically matched children of parents with no SA history). Diagnostic interviews were used to gather information about psychiatric diagnoses, symptoms, and histories of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Children also completed a guessing task, during which continuous electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded. The FN was scored as the mean amplitude, 275-375 ms, following gain or loss feedback at frontocentral sites (Fz and FCz). Children of suicide attempters exhibited significantly more negative ΔFN (i.e., FN to losses minus FN to gains) than children of parents with no SA history. We found that this difference in ΔFN was due specifically to children of parents with a history of SA exhibiting a stronger response to loss, and no group differences were observed for responses to gains. The results suggest that an increased neural response to loss might represent one of the potential pathways of the familial transmission of suicide risk. (PsycINFO Database Record
[更正通知:本文的勘误已发表于《[期刊名称]》第126卷第2期(见记录2016-56318-001)。文章中,图1的坐标轴标签有误。摘要中也有一处错误,未说明ΔFN是按损失的FN减去收益的FN来计算的。本文的所有版本均已更正。]自杀行为在家族中具有聚集性,但自杀风险传递的具体机制尚不清楚。尽管有证据表明奖励反应的异常模式可能是一种潜在机制,但缺乏实证依据。本研究旨在考察无自杀未遂个人史的自杀未遂者子女对收益和损失的神经反应。为了客观评估这些神经反应,我们使用了反馈负波(FN),这是一种对奖励和损失反应的心理生理指标。参与者为66名家长及其7至11岁的孩子(22名有自杀未遂家族史,44名在人口统计学和临床特征上与无自杀未遂家族史的家长的孩子相匹配)。通过诊断访谈收集有关精神疾病诊断、症状以及自杀念头和行为史的信息。孩子们还完成了一项猜测任务,在此期间记录连续脑电图(EEG)。FN被计为额中央部位(Fz和FCz)在收益或损失反馈后275 - 375毫秒的平均振幅。自杀未遂者的子女比无自杀未遂家族史的家长的孩子表现出显著更多的负性ΔFN(即损失的FN减去收益的FN)。我们发现,ΔFN的这种差异具体是由于有自杀未遂家族史的家长的孩子对损失表现出更强的反应,而在对收益的反应上未观察到组间差异。结果表明,对损失的神经反应增强可能是自杀风险家族传递的潜在途径之一。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》