Tsui Judith I, Williams Emily C, Green Pamela K, Berry Kristin, Su Feng, Ioannou George N
General Internal Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States; Health Services Research and Development, Seattle, WA, United States; Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered Value-Driven Care (COIN), Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Dec 1;169:101-109. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.021. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
It is unclear whether alcohol use negatively impacts HCV treatment outcomes in the era of direct antiviral agents (DAAs). We aimed to evaluate the associations between current levels of drinking and treatment response among persons treated for HCV with DAAs in the national Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system.
We identified patients who initiated HCV DAAs over 18 months (1/1/14-6/30/15) and had documented alcohol screening with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Consumption (AUDIT-C) questionnaire within one year prior to initiating therapy. DAAs included: sofosbuvir (SOF), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) or ombitasvir-paritaprevir-ritonavir, and dasabuvir (PrOD). AUDIT-C scores were categorized as 0 (abstinence), 1-3 (low-level drinking) and 4-12 (unhealthy drinking) in men or 0, 1-2 and 3-12 in women.
Among 17,487 patients who initiated DAAs, 15,151 (87%) completed AUDIT-C screening: 10,387 (68.5%) were categorized as abstinent, 3422 (22.6%) as low-level drinking and 1342 (8.9%) as unhealthy drinking. There were no significant differences in sustained virologic response (SVR) rates between abstinent (SVR 91%; 95% CI: 91-92%), low-level drinking (SVR 93%; 95% CI 92-94%) or unhealthy drinking (SVR 91%; 95% 89-92) categories in univariable analysis or in multivariable logistic regression models. However, after imputing missing SVR data, unhealthy drinkers were less likely to achieve SVR in multivariable analysis (AOR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.92).
Absolute SVR rates were uniformly high among all persons regardless of alcohol use, with only minor differences in those who report unhealthy drinking, which supports clinical guidelines that do not recommend excluding persons with alcohol use.
在直接抗病毒药物(DAA)时代,饮酒是否会对丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)治疗结果产生负面影响尚不清楚。我们旨在评估在国家退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗系统中接受DAA治疗的HCV患者当前饮酒水平与治疗反应之间的关联。
我们确定了在18个月内(2014年1月1日至2015年6月30日)开始使用HCV DAA且在开始治疗前一年内使用酒精使用障碍识别测试消费量(AUDIT-C)问卷进行过酒精筛查记录的患者。DAA包括:索磷布韦(SOF)、来迪派韦/索磷布韦(LDV/SOF)或奥比他韦-帕立普韦-利托那韦以及达沙布韦(PrOD)。男性的AUDIT-C评分分为0(戒酒)、1-3(低水平饮酒)和4-12(不健康饮酒),女性分为0、1-2和3-12。
在17487例开始使用DAA的患者中,15151例(87%)完成了AUDIT-C筛查:10387例(68.5%)被归类为戒酒,3422例(22.6%)为低水平饮酒,1342例(8.9%)为不健康饮酒。在单变量分析或多变量逻辑回归模型中,戒酒者(持续病毒学应答率[SVR]为91%;95%置信区间:91-92%)、低水平饮酒者(SVR为93%;95%置信区间92-94%)或不健康饮酒者(SVR为91%;95% 89-92)的SVR率没有显著差异。然而,在推算缺失的SVR数据后,在多变量分析中不健康饮酒者实现SVR的可能性较小(调整后比值比0.75,95%置信区间0.60-0.92)。
无论饮酒情况如何,所有人的绝对SVR率都普遍较高,报告不健康饮酒者仅有微小差异,这支持了不建议排除饮酒者的临床指南。