Coats Erik R, Brinkman Cynthia K, Lee Stephen
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-1022, USA.
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-1022, USA.
Water Res. 2017 Jan 1;108:124-136. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.069. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
The anthropogenic discharge of phosphorus (P) into surface waters can induce the proliferation of cyanobacteria and algae, which can negatively impact water quality. Enhanced biological P removal (EBPR) is an engineered process that can be employed to efficiently remove significant quantities of P from wastewater. Within this engineered system, the mixed microbial consortium (MMC) becomes enriched with polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs). To date much knowledge has been developed on PAOs, and the EBPR process is generally well understood; nonetheless, the engineered process remains underutilized. In this study, investigations were conducted using qPCR and Illumina MiSeq to assess the impacts of wastewater (synthetic vs. real) on EBPR microbial ecology. While a strong relationship was demonstrated between EBPR metrics (P:C; influent VFA:P) and excellent P removal across diverse EBPR systems and MMCs, no such correlations existed with the specific MMCs. Moreover, MMCs exhibited distinct clusters based on substrate, and qPCR results based on the putative PAO Accumulibacter did not correlate with BLASTN eubacterial results for either Accumulibacter or Rhodocyclaceae. More critically, PAO-based sequences aligned poorly with Accumulibacter for both eubacterial and PAO primer sets, which strongly suggests that the conventional PAO primers applied in FISH and qPCR analysis do not sufficiently target the putative PAO Accumulibacter. In particular, negligible alignment was observed for PAO amplicons obtained from a MMC performing excellent EBPR on crude glycerol (an atypical substrate). A synthetic wastewater-based MMC exhibited the best observed BLASTN match of the PAO amplicons, raising concerns about the potential relevance in using synthetic substrates in the study of EBPR.
人为向地表水排放磷(P)会导致蓝藻和藻类大量繁殖,从而对水质产生负面影响。强化生物除磷(EBPR)是一种工程化工艺,可用于从废水中高效去除大量的磷。在这个工程系统中,混合微生物群落(MMC)会富集聚磷菌(PAO)。到目前为止,关于聚磷菌已经有了很多认识,并且EBPR工艺总体上也得到了较好的理解;然而,该工程化工艺仍未得到充分利用。在本研究中,使用定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)和Illumina MiSeq进行调查,以评估废水(合成废水与实际废水)对EBPR微生物生态的影响。虽然在不同的EBPR系统和MMC中,EBPR指标(P:C;进水挥发性脂肪酸:磷)与出色的磷去除之间显示出很强的相关性,但与特定的MMC不存在这种相关性。此外,MMC根据底物表现出明显的聚类,基于假定的聚磷菌聚磷菌属的qPCR结果与聚磷菌属或红环菌科的细菌16S rRNA基因序列比对结果不相关。更关键的是,无论是细菌通用引物还是聚磷菌引物,基于聚磷菌的序列与聚磷菌属的比对都很差,这强烈表明在荧光原位杂交(FISH)和qPCR分析中使用的传统聚磷菌引物不能充分靶向假定的聚磷菌聚磷菌属。特别是,从在粗甘油(一种非典型底物)上表现出出色EBPR的MMC获得的聚磷菌扩增子的比对可以忽略不计。基于合成废水的MMC在聚磷菌扩增子的细菌16S rRNA基因序列比对中表现出最佳匹配,这引发了人们对在EBPR研究中使用合成底物的潜在相关性的担忧。