新的脓毒症共识定义：优点、缺点与不足。 - Suppr

The new sepsis consensus definitions: the good, the bad and the ugly.

作者信息

Sprung Charles L, Schein Roland M H, Balk Robert A

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, (CLS), Jerusalem, Israel.

Section of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Healthcare System and University of Miami, (RMHS), Miami, USA.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):2024-2026. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4604-0. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-016-4604-0

PMID:27815588

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

The new sepsis consensus definitions: the good, the bad and the ugly.

Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):2024-2026. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4604-0. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

New Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock: Continuing Evolution but With Much Still to Be Done.

JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):757-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0290.

Sepsis: Updated definitions and optimized management.

Med Monatsschr Pharm. 2016 Jul;39(7):299-306.

The Sepsis Saga: Sepsis-3-Ready for Prime Time?

Air Med J. 2016 Sep-Oct;35(5):265-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Aug 13.

Early Care of Adults With Suspected Sepsis in the Emergency Department and Out-of-Hospital Environment: A Consensus-Based Task Force Report.

Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;78(1):1-19. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Apr 9.

Focus on infection and sepsis 2017.

Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jun;43(6):867-869. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4787-z. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

Scoring systems for sepsis: which purposes can they serve?

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Nov;24(11):1119-1120. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 11.

Sepsis.

Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2021 Dec;33(4):407-418. doi: 10.1016/j.cnc.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Oct 9.

Sepsis: older and newer concepts.

Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Mar;4(3):237-40. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00522-6. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

New Sepsis Criteria: A Change We Should Not Make.

Chest. 2016 May;149(5):1117-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.02.653. Epub 2016 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

The value of IL-6, PCT, qSOFA, NEWS, and SIRS to predict septic shock after Percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

BMC Urol. 2024 Jun 7;24(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12894-024-01502-y.

Use of Biomarkers to Improve 28-Day Mortality Stratification in Patients with Sepsis and SOFA ≤ 6.

Biomedicines. 2023 Jul 30;11(8):2149. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11082149.

Validation of Sepsis-3 using survival analysis and clinical evaluation of quick SOFA, SIRS, and burn-specific SIRS for sepsis in burn patients with suspected infection.

PLoS One. 2023 Jan 3;18(1):e0276597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276597. eCollection 2023.

Towards Improved Management of Tuberculous Bloodstream Infections: Pharmacokinetic Considerations with Suggestions for Better Treatment Outcomes.

Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Jul 5;11(7):895. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11070895.

Comparative Analyses of the Impact of Different Criteria for Sepsis Diagnosis on Outcome in Patients with Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 4;11(13):3873. doi: 10.3390/jcm11133873.

A comparison of qSOFA, SIRS and NEWS in predicting the accuracy of mortality in patients with suspected sepsis: A meta-analysis.

PLoS One. 2022 Apr 15;17(4):e0266755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266755. eCollection 2022.

Diagnostic Accuracy and Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratios in Septic Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Aug 7;57(8):811. doi: 10.3390/medicina57080811.

SARS-CoV-2: An Update on Genomics, Risk Assessment, Potential Therapeutics and Vaccine Development.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 8;18(4):1626. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041626.

Best diagnostic accuracy of sepsis combining SIRS criteria or qSOFA score with Procalcitonin and Mid-Regional pro-Adrenomedullin outside ICU.

Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 6;10(1):16605. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73676-y.

Depressed sympathovagal modulation indicates sepsis in patients with suspected infection.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(4):e18961. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018961.

本文引用的文献

To SIRS With Love-An Open Letter.

Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr;45(4):736-738. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002156.

The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.

Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles and outcome: results from the International Multicentre Prevalence Study on Sepsis (the IMPreSS study).

Intensive Care Med. 2015 Sep;41(9):1620-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3906-y. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.

Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.

The Eldicus prospective, observational study of triage decision making in European intensive care units: part I--European Intensive Care Admission Triage Scores.

Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):125-31. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822e5692.

Promoting Global Research Excellence in Severe Sepsis (PROGRESS): lessons from an international sepsis registry.

Infection. 2009 Jun;37(3):222-32. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-8203-z. Epub 2009 Apr 28.

An evaluation of systemic inflammatory response syndrome signs in the Sepsis Occurrence In Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) study.

Intensive Care Med. 2006 Mar;32(3):421-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-0039-8. Epub 2006 Feb 15.

Inclusion criteria for clinical trials in sepsis: did the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine consensus conference definitions of sepsis have an impact?

Chest. 2005 Jan;127(1):242-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.127.1.242.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

The new sepsis consensus definitions: the good, the bad and the ugly.

作者信息

机构信息

出版信息

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

用中文搜PubMed

文档翻译

Suppr 超能文献

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献