Kok A, van Knegsel A T M, van Middelaar C E, Engel B, Hogeveen H, Kemp B, de Boer I J M
Animal Production Systems group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands; Adaptation Physiology group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Adaptation Physiology group, Wageningen University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, the Netherlands.
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jan;100(1):739-749. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-10963. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
Shortening or omitting the dry period (DP) can improve the energy balance of dairy cows in early lactation through a decrease in milk yield after calving. Little is known about the effect of a short or no DP on milk yield over multiple lactations. Our objectives were (1) to assess the effect of DP length over multiple lactations on milk yield, and (2) to assess if the prediction of milk yield in response to DP length could be improved by including individual cow characteristics before calving. Lactation data (2007 to 2015) of 16 Dutch dairy farms that apply no or short DP were used to compute cumulative milk yield in the 60 d before calving (additional yield) and in the 305 d after calving (305-d yield), and the mean daily yield over the interval from 60 d before calving to 60 d before next calving (effective lactation yield). The DP categories were no (0 to 2 wk), short (3 to 5wk), standard (6 to 8 wk), and long (9 to 12 wk). The effect of current DP and previous DP on yields was analyzed with mixed models (n=1,420 lactations). The highest effective lactation yield of fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM) was observed for cows with a standard current DP (27.6kg per day); a daily decrease was observed of 0.6kg for a long DP, 1.0kg for a short DP, and 2.0kg for no DP. Previous DP did not significantly affect the effective lactation yield. Thus, cows can be managed with short or no DP over consecutive lactations without a change in quantity of milk losses. Cows that received no DP for consecutive lactations had a lower additional yield before calving (-172kg of FPCM), but a higher 305-d yield (+560kg of FPCM), compared with cows that received no DP for the first time. This could lessen the improvement of the energy balance in early lactation when no DP is applied a second time compared with the first time. For the second objective, a basic model was explored to predict effective lactation yield based on parity, DP length, and first-parity 305-d yield (n=2,866 lactations). The basic model was subsequently extended with data about recent yield, days open, and somatic cell count. Extending the model reduced the error of individual predictions by only 6%. Therefore, the basic model seems sufficient to predict the effect of DP length on effective lactation yield. Other individual cow characteristics can still be relevant, however, to make a practical and tailored decision about DP length.
缩短或省略干奶期(DP)可通过降低产犊后产奶量来改善泌乳早期奶牛的能量平衡。关于短干奶期或无干奶期对多个泌乳期产奶量的影响,人们了解甚少。我们的目标是:(1)评估多个泌乳期干奶期长度对产奶量的影响;(2)评估是否可以通过纳入产犊前的个体奶牛特征来改善对干奶期长度响应的产奶量预测。使用了16个荷兰奶牛场(采用无干奶期或短干奶期)2007年至2015年的泌乳数据,计算产犊前60天的累计产奶量(额外产奶量)和产犊后305天的累计产奶量(305天产奶量),以及从产犊前60天到下次产犊前60天期间的平均日产奶量(有效泌乳期产奶量)。干奶期类别为无(0至2周)、短(3至5周)、标准(6至8周)和长(9至12周)。使用混合模型(n = 1,420次泌乳)分析当前干奶期和之前干奶期对产奶量的影响。对于当前干奶期为标准时长的奶牛,观察到其脂肪和蛋白质校正乳(FPCM)的有效泌乳期产奶量最高(每天27.6千克);与标准干奶期相比,长干奶期奶牛的日产奶量每天减少0.6千克,短干奶期奶牛每天减少1.0千克,无干奶期奶牛每天减少2.0千克。之前的干奶期对有效泌乳期产奶量没有显著影响。因此,连续多个泌乳期对奶牛采用短干奶期或无干奶期管理,不会改变产奶量损失的数量。与首次采用无干奶期的奶牛相比,连续多个泌乳期采用无干奶期的奶牛在产犊前的额外产奶量较低(少172千克FPCM),但305天产奶量较高(多560千克FPCM)。与首次采用无干奶期相比,第二次采用无干奶期时,这可能会削弱泌乳早期能量平衡的改善效果。对于第二个目标,探索了一个基于胎次(产次)、干奶期长度和头胎305天产奶量来预测有效泌乳期产奶量的基本模型(n = 2,866次泌乳)。随后,该基本模型通过纳入近期产奶量、空怀天数和体细胞计数的数据进行了扩展。扩展后的模型仅将个体预测误差降低了6%。因此,基本模型似乎足以预测干奶期长度对有效泌乳期产奶量的影响。然而,为了就干奶期长度做出实际且量身定制的决策,其他个体奶牛特征可能仍然具有相关性。