文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

经皮乳突电刺激预防偏头痛:一项随机双盲对照试验。

Migraine prevention with percutaneous mastoid electrical stimulator: A randomized double-blind controlled trial.

机构信息

1 Department of Neurology, The Second People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.

2 Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2017 Nov;37(13):1248-1256. doi: 10.1177/0333102416678623. Epub 2016 Nov 12.


DOI:10.1177/0333102416678623
PMID:27821639
Abstract

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of episodic migraine prevention with the percutaneous mastoid electrical stimulator (PMES). Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled trial that involved four medical centers. Episodic patients with at least two migraine attacks every month were randomly 1:1 to PMES or sham stimulation treatment. The treatments were performed daily for 45 minutes over 3 months. The primary outcomes were change in migraine days per month and the 50% response rate. Results The PMES group had a significantly greater reduction of migraine days in the third month than the sham group (-71.3% vs. -14.4%, p < 0.001). The 50% response rate of migraine days in the PMES group (≥50% reduction of migraine days compared with the baseline) was significantly higher than that in the sham group (82.5% vs. 17.5%, p < 0.001). In the PMES group, 60% of the patients had a ≥75% reduction of migraine days in the third month, and 35% of the patients had no migraine attack in the third month. No patients in the sham group had a ≥75% reduction of migraine days. There were no adverse events in either group. Conclusion Treatment of migraine using non-invasive PMES was safe and effective.

摘要

目的 评估经皮乳突电刺激(PMES)预防阵发性偏头痛的有效性和安全性。

方法 这是一项随机、双盲、假对照试验,涉及四个医疗中心。每月至少有两次偏头痛发作的阵发性患者以 1:1 的比例随机分为 PMES 或假刺激治疗组。治疗每天进行 45 分钟,持续 3 个月。主要结局是每月偏头痛天数的变化和 50%反应率。

结果 PMES 组在第三个月的偏头痛天数明显减少,比假刺激组减少了 71.3%(-71.3%对-14.4%,p<0.001)。PMES 组偏头痛天数的 50%反应率(与基线相比,偏头痛天数减少≥50%)明显高于假刺激组(82.5%对 17.5%,p<0.001)。在 PMES 组中,60%的患者在第三个月偏头痛天数减少≥75%,35%的患者在第三个月没有偏头痛发作。假刺激组没有患者偏头痛天数减少≥75%。两组均无不良事件。

结论 使用非侵入性 PMES 治疗偏头痛是安全有效的。

相似文献

[1]
Migraine prevention with percutaneous mastoid electrical stimulator: A randomized double-blind controlled trial.

Cephalalgia. 2016-11-12

[2]
A Head-to-Head Comparison of Percutaneous Mastoid Electrical Stimulator and Supraorbital Transcutaneous Stimulator in the Prevention of Migraine: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study.

Neuromodulation. 2020-8

[3]
Percutaneous mastoid electrical stimulator improves Poststroke depression and cognitive function in patients with Ischaemic stroke: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled study.

BMC Neurol. 2020-5-29

[4]
Migraine prevention with a supraorbital transcutaneous stimulator: a randomized controlled trial.

Neurology. 2013-2-6

[5]
Percutaneous mastoid electrical stimulator alleviates autonomic dysfunction in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Neurol Res. 2018-11

[6]
Acute migraine therapy with external trigeminal neurostimulation (ACME): A randomized controlled trial.

Cephalalgia. 2018-11-17

[7]
Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TEV-48125 for preventive treatment of high-frequency episodic migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study.

Lancet Neurol. 2015-9-30

[8]
Preventing Episodic Migraine With Caloric Vestibular Stimulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Headache. 2017-7

[9]
Topiramate versus amitriptyline in migraine prevention: a 26-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group noninferiority trial in adult migraineurs.

Clin Ther. 2009-3

[10]
Botulinum toxin type a prophylactic treatment of episodic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory study.

Headache. 2007-4

引用本文的文献

[1]
Non-Pharmacological Treatment for Chronic Migraine.

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023-11

[2]
Devices for Episodic Migraine: Past, Present, and Future.

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022-3

[3]
Neuromodulation for Chronic Daily Headache.

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022-3

[4]
Non-Invasive Neurostimulation Methods for Acute and Preventive Migraine Treatment-A Narrative Review.

J Clin Med. 2021-7-27

[5]
Noninvasive Neuromodulation in Migraine.

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020-12-16

[6]
Neuromodulation techniques for acute and preventive migraine treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

J Headache Pain. 2020-12-10

[7]
Percutaneous mastoid electrical stimulator improves Poststroke depression and cognitive function in patients with Ischaemic stroke: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled study.

BMC Neurol. 2020-5-29

[8]
Emerging Treatments in Episodic Migraine.

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2018-7-16

[9]
Non-Pharmacological Approaches for Migraine.

Neurotherapeutics. 2018-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索