Suppr超能文献

经皮乳突电刺激改善缺血性脑卒中后抑郁和认知功能障碍患者的疗效:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、假刺激对照研究。

Percutaneous mastoid electrical stimulator improves Poststroke depression and cognitive function in patients with Ischaemic stroke: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, The Second People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, 610021, PR China.

Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400030, PR China.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2020 May 29;20(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-01795-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poststroke depression can lead to functional dependence, cognitive impairment and reduced quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a percutaneous mastoid electrical stimulator (PMES) plus antidepressants on poststroke depression and cognitive function.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled study. A total of 258 clinically depressed ischaemic stroke patients within 14 days of index stroke were randomly assigned to the PMES plus antidepressant (PMES group, N = 125) and sham plus antidepressant (sham group, N = 133) groups. All patients underwent the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) test at 2 weeks (baseline), and 6 months(M6) after ischaemic stroke. Primary outcomes were the percentage of patients showing a treatment response (≥50% reduction in HRSD score) and depression remission (HRSD score ≤ 9) at 6 months. The secondary outcome was the percentage of patients with a MoCA score < 26.

RESULTS

The percentages of patients showing a treatment response and depression remission were significantly higher in the PMES group than in the sham group (57.60% vs 41.35%, P = 0.009; 44.00% vs 29.32%, P = 0.014 respectively). The mean value of the HRSD score change [M (month)6-baseline] was significantly higher in the PMES group than in the sham group at 6 months (- 11.93 ± 5.32 vs - 10.48 ± 6.10, P = 0.036, respectively). The percentage of patients with MoCA scores < 26 was lower in the PEMS group than in the sham group (12.0% vs 24.06%, P = 0.012,respectively), and the mean value of the MoCA score change (M6-baseline) was higher in the PMES group than in the sham group (3.50 ± 2.55 vs 2.72 ± 2.52, P = 0.005, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate that PMES adjunctive to antidepressant therapy is effective in reducing depression, achieving remission in the short term, and improving cognition.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was retrospectively registered (registration number: ChiCTR1800016463) on 03 June 2018.

摘要

背景

卒中后抑郁可导致功能依赖、认知障碍和生活质量下降。本研究旨在评估经皮乳突电刺激(PMES)联合抗抑郁药对卒中后抑郁和认知功能的影响。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、假对照研究。共纳入 258 例卒中后 14 天内的临床抑郁性缺血性卒中患者,随机分为 PMES 联合抗抑郁药(PMES 组,n=125)和假刺激联合抗抑郁药(假刺激组,n=133)。所有患者在 2 周(基线)和缺血性卒中后 6 个月(M6)时接受蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)和汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HRSD)测试。主要结局是治疗 6 个月后患者出现治疗反应(HRSD 评分降低≥50%)和抑郁缓解(HRSD 评分≤9)的比例。次要结局是 MoCA 评分<26 的患者比例。

结果

PMES 组患者的治疗反应和抑郁缓解率显著高于假刺激组(57.60% vs. 41.35%,P=0.009;44.00% vs. 29.32%,P=0.014)。PMES 组患者在 6 个月时的 HRSD 评分变化均值(M6-基线)显著高于假刺激组(-11.93±5.32 vs. -10.48±6.10,P=0.036)。PMES 组患者的 MoCA 评分<26 的比例低于假刺激组(12.0% vs. 24.06%,P=0.012),PMES 组患者的 MoCA 评分变化均值(M6-基线)也高于假刺激组(3.50±2.55 vs. 2.72±2.52,P=0.005)。

结论

这些发现表明,PMES 联合抗抑郁药治疗可有效减轻抑郁,在短期内达到缓解,并改善认知功能。

试验注册

该试验于 2018 年 6 月 3 日进行了回顾性注册(注册号:ChiCTR1800016463)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4ee/7257192/9a7134c92ae1/12883_2020_1795_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验