1 Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
2 Rowe Neurology Institute, Lenexa, KS, USA.
Cephalalgia. 2019 Jan;39(1):3-14. doi: 10.1177/0333102418811573. Epub 2018 Nov 17.
To assess the safety and efficacy of external trigeminal nerve stimulation for acute pain relief during migraine attacks with or without aura via a sham-controlled trial.
This was a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study conducted across three headache centers in the United States. Adult patients who were experiencing an acute migraine attack with or without aura were recruited on site and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either verum or sham external trigeminal nerve stimulation treatment (CEFALY Technology) for 1 hour. Pain intensity was scored using a visual analogue scale (0 = no pain to 10 = maximum pain). The primary outcome measure was the mean change in pain intensity at 1 hour compared to baseline.
A total of 109 participants were screened between February 1, 2016 and March 31, 2017. Of these, 106 patients were randomized and included in the intention-to-treat analysis (verum: n = 52; sham: n = 54). The primary outcome measure was significantly more reduced in the verum group than in the sham group: -3.46 ± 2.32 versus -1.78 ± 1.89 ( p < 0.0001), or -59% versus -30% ( p < 0.0001). With regards to migraine subgroups, there was a significant difference in pain reduction between verum and sham for 'migraine without aura' attacks: mean visual analogue scale reduction at 1 hour was -3.3 ± 2.4 for the verum group versus -1.7 ± 1.9 for the sham group ( p = 0.0006). For 'migraine with aura' attacks, pain reduction was numerically greater for verum versus sham, but did not reach significance: mean visual analogue scale reduction at 1 hour was -4.3 ± 1.8 for the verum group versus -2.6 ± 1.9 for the sham group ( p = 0.060). No serious adverse events were reported and five minor adverse events occurred in the verum group.
One-hour treatment with external trigeminal nerve stimulation resulted in significant headache pain relief compared to sham stimulation and was well tolerated, suggesting it may be a safe and effective acute treatment for migraine attacks.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02590939.
通过一项假对照试验评估外部三叉神经刺激治疗有或无先兆偏头痛急性发作时的安全性和疗效。
这是一项在美国三个头痛中心进行的双盲、随机、假对照研究。在现场招募正在经历急性偏头痛发作(有或无先兆)的成年患者,并将其随机 1:1 分配接受真刺激或假刺激(CEFALY 技术)治疗 1 小时。疼痛强度采用视觉模拟评分(0=无痛至 10=最大疼痛)。主要观察指标为与基线相比 1 小时时疼痛强度的平均变化。
2016 年 2 月 1 日至 2017 年 3 月 31 日期间共筛查了 109 名患者。其中,106 名患者被随机分配并纳入意向治疗分析(真刺激组:n=52;假刺激组:n=54)。主要观察指标在真刺激组显著优于假刺激组:-3.46±2.32 对-1.78±1.89(p<0.0001),或-59%对-30%(p<0.0001)。对于偏头痛亚组,真刺激和假刺激在“无先兆偏头痛”发作时的疼痛缓解差异有统计学意义:真刺激组 1 小时时视觉模拟评分的平均降幅为-3.3±2.4,假刺激组为-1.7±1.9(p=0.0006)。对于“有先兆偏头痛”发作,真刺激组的疼痛缓解程度大于假刺激组,但无统计学意义:真刺激组 1 小时时视觉模拟评分的平均降幅为-4.3±1.8,假刺激组为-2.6±1.9(p=0.060)。未报告严重不良事件,真刺激组发生 5 例轻微不良事件。
与假刺激相比,外部三叉神经刺激 1 小时治疗可显著缓解头痛,且耐受性良好,提示其可能是一种安全有效的偏头痛急性发作治疗方法。
临床试验.gov 标识符:NCT02590939。