DiDomenico Lawrence A, Orgill Dennis P, Galiano Robert D, Serena Thomas E, Carter Marissa J, Kaufman Jarrod P, Young Nathan J, Zelen Charles M
Lower Extremity Institute for Research and Therapy, Youngstown, Ohio; Department of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass.; Division of Plastic Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.; Serena Group, Cambridge, Mass.; Strategic Solutions, Inc., Cody, Wyo.; General Surgery, Premier Surgical, Brick, N.J.; †Martinsville Research Institute, Martinsville, Va.; and ‡Professional Education and Research Institute, Roanoke, Va.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Oct 12;4(10):e1095. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001095. eCollection 2016 Oct.
Allogeneic grafts derived from amnion/chorion are known to be efficacious in healing chronic diabetic foot ulcerations (DFUs). The goal of this study was to compare aseptically processed dehydrated human amnion and chorion allograft (dHACA) versus standard of care (SOC) in facilitating wound closure in nonhealing DFUs.
Patients with DFUs treated with SOC (off-loading, appropriate debridement, and moist wound care) after a 2-week screening period were randomized to either SOC or wound-size-specific dHACA (AmnioBand, Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation, Edison, N.J.) applied weekly for up to 12 weeks plus SOC. Primary endpoint was the percentage of wounds healed at 6 weeks between groups.
At 6 weeks, 70% (14/20) of the dHACA-treated DFUs healed compared with 15% (3/20) treated with SOC alone. Furthermore, at 12 weeks, 85% (17/20) of the DFUs in the dHACA group healed compared with 25% (5/20) in the SOC group, with a corresponding mean time to heal of 36 and 70 days, respectively. At 12 weeks, the mean number of grafts used per healed wound for the dHACA group was 3.8 (median 3.0), and mean cost of the tissue to heal a DFU was $1400. The mean wastage at 12 weeks was 40%. One adverse event and 1 serious adverse event occurred in the dHACA group; neither was graft related. Three adverse events and 1 serious adverse event occurred in the SOC group.
Aseptically processed dHACA heals diabetic foot wounds significantly faster than SOC at 6 and 12 weeks with minimal graft wastage.
已知源自羊膜/绒毛膜的同种异体移植物在治疗慢性糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)方面有效。本研究的目的是比较无菌处理的脱水人羊膜和绒毛膜同种异体移植物(dHACA)与标准治疗(SOC)在促进不愈合DFU伤口闭合方面的效果。
经过2周筛查期后接受SOC治疗(减压、适当清创和湿性伤口护理)的DFU患者被随机分为SOC组或根据伤口大小使用特定的dHACA(AmnioBand,肌肉骨骼移植基金会,新泽西州爱迪生市),每周应用,最长12周,外加SOC。主要终点是两组在6周时伤口愈合的百分比。
在6周时,接受dHACA治疗的DFU中有70%(14/20)愈合,而仅接受SOC治疗的为15%(3/20)。此外,在12周时,dHACA组中85%(17/20)的DFU愈合,而SOC组为25%(5/20),相应的平均愈合时间分别为36天和70天。在12周时,dHACA组每个愈合伤口使用的移植物平均数量为3.8(中位数为3.0),愈合一个DFU的组织平均成本为1400美元。12周时的平均浪费率为40%。dHACA组发生1例不良事件和1例严重不良事件;均与移植物无关。SOC组发生3例不良事件和1例严重不良事件。
无菌处理的dHACA在6周和12周时愈合糖尿病足伤口的速度明显快于SOC,且移植物浪费最小。