• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响言语测听评估的语言因素。

Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment.

机构信息

Language and Hearing Center Amsterdam, Free University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; The Eargroup, Antwerp, Belgium.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7249848. doi: 10.1155/2016/7249848. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1155/2016/7249848
PMID:27830152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5088328/
Abstract

In speech audiometric testing, hearing performance is typically measured by calculating the number of correct repetitions of a speech stimulus. We investigate to what extent the repetition accuracy of Dutch speech stimuli presented against a background noise is influenced by nonauditory processes. We show that variation in verbal repetition accuracy is partially explained by morpholexical and syntactic features of the target language. Verbs, prepositions, conjunctions, determiners, and pronouns yield significantly lower correct repetitions than nouns, adjectives, or adverbs. The reduced repetition performance for verbs and function words is probably best explained by the similarities in the perceptual nature of verbal morphology and function words in Dutch. For sentences, an overall negative effect of syntactic complexity on speech repetition accuracy was found. The lowest number of correct repetitions was obtained with passive sentences, reflecting the cognitive cost of processing a noncanonical sentence structure. Taken together, these findings may have important implications for the audiological practice. In combination with hearing loss, linguistic complexity may increase the cognitive demands to process sentences in noise, leading to suboptimal functional hearing in day-to-day listening situations. Using test sentences with varying degrees of syntactic complexity may therefore provide useful information to measure functional hearing benefits.

摘要

在言语测听测试中,通常通过计算正确重复言语刺激的次数来衡量听力表现。我们研究了在背景噪声中呈现荷兰语言语刺激时,非听觉过程对重复准确性的影响程度。我们表明,言语重复准确性的变化部分可以通过目标语言的形态和句法特征来解释。动词、介词、连词、限定词和代词的正确重复次数明显低于名词、形容词或副词。动词和功能词的重复表现较差可能最好地解释了荷兰语中言语形态和功能词在感知性质上的相似性。对于句子,发现句法复杂度对言语重复准确性有总体的负面影响。被动句的正确重复次数最少,反映了处理非规范句结构的认知成本。总的来说,这些发现可能对听力学实践具有重要意义。结合听力损失,语言复杂性可能会增加在噪声中处理句子的认知需求,导致在日常听力情况下的功能听力不佳。因此,使用具有不同句法复杂度的测试句子可能会提供有用的信息来衡量功能听力的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baf9/5088328/2e487e2ce691/BMRI2016-7249848.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baf9/5088328/88d0b0cbff75/BMRI2016-7249848.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baf9/5088328/fcd1186f85ca/BMRI2016-7249848.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baf9/5088328/6245c88734c0/BMRI2016-7249848.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baf9/5088328/2e487e2ce691/BMRI2016-7249848.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baf9/5088328/88d0b0cbff75/BMRI2016-7249848.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baf9/5088328/fcd1186f85ca/BMRI2016-7249848.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baf9/5088328/6245c88734c0/BMRI2016-7249848.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baf9/5088328/2e487e2ce691/BMRI2016-7249848.004.jpg

相似文献

1
Linguistic Factors Influencing Speech Audiometric Assessment.影响言语测听评估的语言因素。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7249848. doi: 10.1155/2016/7249848. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
2
The influence of semantically related and unrelated text cues on the intelligibility of sentences in noise.语义相关和不相关的文本提示对噪声中句子可理解性的影响。
Ear Hear. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):e16-25. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318228036a.
3
The effects of limited bandwidth and noise on verbal processing time and word recall in normal-hearing children.有限带宽和噪声对正常听力儿童言语处理时间和单词回忆的影响。
Ear Hear. 2013 Sep;34(5):585-91. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828576e2.
4
How does linguistic complexity influence intelligibility in a German audiometric sentence intelligibility test?语言复杂性如何影响德语测听句可懂度测试中的可懂度?
Int J Audiol. 2011 Sep;50(9):621-31. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.582166. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
5
Speech understanding in noise in elderly adults: the effect of inhibitory control and syntactic complexity.老年人在噪声环境中的言语理解:抑制控制和句法复杂性的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018 May;53(3):628-642. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12376. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
6
The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.听力损伤和衰老对空间处理的影响。
Ear Hear. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1):15-28. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182617f94.
7
Content and procedural learning in repeated sentence tests of speech perception.言语感知重复句子测试中的内容和程序学习。
Ear Hear. 2010 Dec;31(6):769-78. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e68e4a.
8
Hearing loss and cognitive effort in older adults' report accuracy for verbal materials.老年人对言语材料报告准确性中的听力损失与认知努力
J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Feb;20(2):147-54. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.20.2.7.
9
Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.噪声环境下言语感知时的认知负荷:年龄、听力损失和认知对瞳孔反应的影响。
Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):498-510. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820512bb.
10
Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies.听力图正常的老年人在LiSN-S测试中的言语中言语聆听能力取决于高频认知和听力敏锐度。
Ear Hear. 2015 Jan;36(1):24-41. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000096.

引用本文的文献

1
Automating Speech Audiometry in Quiet and in Noise Using a Deep Neural Network.使用深度神经网络实现安静和噪声环境下言语测听的自动化
Biology (Basel). 2025 Feb 12;14(2):191. doi: 10.3390/biology14020191.
2
LiCoS: A New Linguistically Controlled Sentences Test to Assess Functional Hearing Performance.LiCoS:一种用于评估功能性听力表现的新型语言控制句子测试。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2018;70(2):90-99. doi: 10.1159/000490050. Epub 2018 Jul 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Spoken Word Recognition Errors in Speech Audiometry: A Measure of Hearing Performance?言语测听中的言语识别错误:听力表现的一种度量?
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:932519. doi: 10.1155/2015/932519. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
2
Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age.噪声环境下阈上听觉处理缺陷:听力损失和年龄的影响
Hear Res. 2016 Jan;331:27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
3
Associations between speech understanding and auditory and visual tests of verbal working memory: effects of linguistic complexity, task, age, and hearing loss.
言语理解与言语工作记忆的听觉和视觉测试之间的关联:语言复杂性、任务、年龄及听力损失的影响
Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 16;6:1394. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01394. eCollection 2015.
4
The relationship of speech intelligibility with hearing sensitivity, cognition, and perceived hearing difficulties varies for different speech perception tests.对于不同的言语感知测试,言语可懂度与听力敏感度、认知及感知到的听力困难之间的关系各不相同。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 16;6:782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00782. eCollection 2015.
5
How hearing impairment affects sentence comprehension: using eye fixations to investigate the duration of speech processing.听力障碍如何影响句子理解:使用眼动追踪技术研究言语加工的时长。
Trends Hear. 2015 Apr 24;19:2331216515584149. doi: 10.1177/2331216515584149.
6
The role of auditory and cognitive factors in understanding speech in noise by normal-hearing older listeners.正常听力老年人在噪声中理解言语的听觉和认知因素的作用。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Nov 12;6:307. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00307. eCollection 2014.
7
Relation between speech-in-noise threshold, hearing loss and cognition from 40-69 years of age.40至69岁人群的噪声环境下言语阈值、听力损失与认知之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 17;9(9):e107720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107720. eCollection 2014.
8
Development and evaluation of a linguistically and audiologically controlled sentence intelligibility test.言语可懂度测试的语言学和听力学控制的开发和评估。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Oct;134(4):3039-56. doi: 10.1121/1.4818760.
9
The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances.语言理解简易度(ELU)模型:理论、实证与临床应用进展。
Front Syst Neurosci. 2013 Jul 13;7:31. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031. eCollection 2013.
10
The effects of aging on auditory processing and cognition.衰老对听觉处理和认知的影响。
Am J Audiol. 2012 Dec;21(2):344-50. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0030).