Drewnowski Adam, Aggarwal Anju, Tang Wesley, Hurvitz Philip M, Scully Jason, Stewart Orion, Moudon Anne Vernez
Center for Public Health Nutrition, 1107 NE 45th St, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
University of Washington, Box 353410, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 10;16(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3798-y.
The built environment (BE) is said to influence local obesity rates. Few studies have explored causal pathways between home-neighborhood BE variables and health outcomes such as obesity. Such pathways are likely to involve both physical activity and diet.
The Seattle Obesity Study (SOS II) was a longitudinal cohort of 440 adult residents of King Co, WA. Home addresses were geocoded. Home-neighborhood BE measures were framed as counts and densities of food sources and physical activity locations. Tax parcel property values were obtained from County tax assessor. Healthy Eating Index (HEI 2010) scores were constructed using data from food frequency questionnaires. Physical activity (PA) was obtained by self-report. Weights and heights were measured at baseline and following 12 months' exposure. Multivariable regressions examined the associations among BE measures at baseline, health behaviors (HEI-2010 and physical activity) at baseline, and health outcome both cross-sectionally and longitudinally.
None of the conventional neighborhood BE metrics were associated either with diet quality, or with meeting PA guidelines. Only higher property values did predict better diets and more physical activity. Better diets and more physical activity were associated with lower obesity prevalence at baseline and 12 mo, but did not predict weight change.
Any links between the BE and health outcomes critically depend on establishing appropriate behavioral pathways. In this study, home-centric BE measures, were not related to physical activity or to diet. Further studies will need to consider a broader range of BE attributes that may be related to diets and health.
据说建筑环境(BE)会影响当地的肥胖率。很少有研究探讨家庭邻里建筑环境变量与肥胖等健康结果之间的因果途径。这些途径可能涉及身体活动和饮食。
西雅图肥胖研究(SOS II)是对华盛顿州金县440名成年居民进行的纵向队列研究。家庭住址进行了地理编码。家庭邻里建筑环境指标以食物来源和身体活动场所的数量和密度来表示。税务地块房产价值从县税务评估员处获得。健康饮食指数(HEI 2010)得分使用食物频率问卷数据构建。身体活动(PA)通过自我报告获得。在基线和暴露12个月后测量体重和身高。多变量回归横断面和纵向研究了基线时的建筑环境指标、基线时的健康行为(HEI - 2010和身体活动)与健康结果之间的关联。
没有一个传统的邻里建筑环境指标与饮食质量或达到身体活动指南相关。只有较高的房产价值确实预示着更好的饮食和更多的身体活动。更好的饮食和更多的身体活动与基线和12个月时较低的肥胖患病率相关,但不能预测体重变化。
建筑环境与健康结果之间的任何联系都严重依赖于建立适当的行为途径。在本研究中,以家庭为中心的建筑环境指标与身体活动或饮食无关。进一步的研究需要考虑更广泛的可能与饮食和健康相关的建筑环境属性。