Linsen Philip V M, Coenen Adriaan, Lubbers Marisa M, Dijkshoorn Marcel L, Ouhlous Mohamed, Nieman Koen
Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2016 Oct 21;6:44. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.192840. eCollection 2016.
This study aims to compare image quality, radiation dose, and the influence of the heart rate on image quality of high-pitch spiral coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) using 128-slice (second generation) dual-source CT (DSCT) and a 192-slice DSCT (third generation) scanner.
Two consecutive cohorts of fifty patients underwent CCTA by high-pitch spiral scan mode using 128 or 192-slice DSCT. The 192-slice DSCT system has a more powerful roentgen tube (2 × 120 kW) that allows CCTA acquisition at lower tube voltages, wider longitudinal coverage for faster table speed (732 m/s), and the use of iterative reconstruction. Objective image quality was measured as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Subjective image quality was evaluated using a Likert scale.
While the effective dose was lower with 192-slice DSCT (1.2 ± 0.5 vs. 0.6 ± 0.3 mSv; < 0.001), the SNR (18.9 ± 4.3 vs. 11.0 ± 2.9; < 0.001) and CNR (23.5 ± 4.8 vs. 14.3 ± 4.1; < 0.001) were superior to 128-slice DSCT. Although patients scanned with 192-slice DSCT had a faster heart rate (59 ± 7 vs. 56 ± 6; = 0.045), subjective image quality was scored higher (4.2 ± 0.8 vs. 3.0 ± 0.7; < 0.001) compared to 128-slice DSCT.
High-pitch spiral CCTA by 192-slice DSCT provides better image quality, despite a higher average heart rate, at lower radiation doses compared to 128-slice DSCT.
本研究旨在比较使用128层(第二代)双源CT(DSCT)和192层DSCT(第三代)扫描仪进行高螺距螺旋冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)时的图像质量、辐射剂量以及心率对图像质量的影响。
连续两组各50例患者使用128层或192层DSCT通过高螺距螺旋扫描模式进行CCTA检查。192层DSCT系统具有更强大的X射线管(2×120kW),可在更低的管电压下进行CCTA采集,纵向覆盖范围更广,扫描床速度更快(732m/s),并可使用迭代重建技术。客观图像质量通过信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)进行测量。主观图像质量使用李克特量表进行评估。
192层DSCT的有效剂量更低(1.2±0.5 vs. 0.6±0.3mSv;<0.001),但其SNR(18.9±4.3 vs. 11.0±2.9;<0.001)和CNR(23.5±4.8 vs. 14.3±4.1;<0.001)优于128层DSCT。尽管使用192层DSCT扫描的患者心率更快(59±7 vs. 56±6;=0.045),但与128层DSCT相比,主观图像质量评分更高(4.2±0.8 vs. 3.0±0.7;<0.001)。
与128层DSCT相比,192层DSCT进行的高螺距螺旋CCTA在较低辐射剂量下提供了更好的图像质量,尽管平均心率较高。