• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于MEMS惯性测量单元的桥梁转角响应测定方法

Determination Method of Bridge Rotation Angle Response Using MEMS IMU.

作者信息

Sekiya Hidehiko, Kinomoto Takeshi, Miki Chitoshi

机构信息

Advanced Research Laboratories, Tokyo City University, 8-15-1 Todoroki, Setagaya 158-0082, Japan.

Maintenance and Transportation Division, Metropolitan Expressway Co., Ltd., 1-4-1 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku 100-8930, Japan.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2016 Nov 9;16(11):1882. doi: 10.3390/s16111882.

DOI:10.3390/s16111882
PMID:27834871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5134541/
Abstract

To implement steel bridge maintenance, especially that related to fatigue damage, it is important to monitor bridge deformations under traffic conditions. Bridges deform and rotate differently under traffic load conditions because their structures differ in terms of length and flexibility. Such monitoring enables the identification of the cause of stress concentrations that cause fatigue damage and the proposal of appropriate countermeasures. However, although bridge deformation monitoring requires observations of bridge angle response as well as the bridge displacement response, measuring the rotation angle response of a bridge subject to traffic loads is difficult. Theoretically, the rotation angle response can be calculated by integrating the angular velocity, but for field measurements of actual in-service bridges, estimating the necessary boundary conditions would be difficult due to traffic-induced vibration. To solve the problem, this paper proposes a method for determining the rotation angle response of an in-service bridge from its angular velocity, as measured by a inertial measurement unit (IMU). To verify our proposed method, field measurements were conducted using nine micro-electrical mechanical systems (MEMS) IMUs and two contact displacement gauges. The results showed that our proposed method provided high accuracy when compared to the reference responses calculated by the contact displacement gauges.

摘要

为实施钢桥维护,尤其是与疲劳损伤相关的维护,监测交通状况下的桥梁变形至关重要。由于桥梁结构在长度和柔韧性方面存在差异,它们在交通荷载条件下的变形和旋转方式也各不相同。这种监测能够识别导致疲劳损伤的应力集中原因,并提出适当的应对措施。然而,尽管桥梁变形监测需要观测桥梁角度响应以及桥梁位移响应,但测量承受交通荷载的桥梁的旋转角度响应却很困难。从理论上讲,旋转角度响应可以通过积分角速度来计算,但对于实际在用桥梁的现场测量,由于交通引起的振动,估计所需的边界条件将很困难。为解决该问题,本文提出一种根据惯性测量单元(IMU)测量的角速度来确定在用桥梁旋转角度响应的方法。为验证我们提出的方法,使用九个微机电系统(MEMS)IMU和两个接触式位移计进行了现场测量。结果表明,与通过接触式位移计计算的参考响应相比,我们提出的方法具有很高的精度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/f09e820e5df5/sensors-16-01882-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/c92ccbb35e6b/sensors-16-01882-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/f971fc536cc3/sensors-16-01882-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/f970deb4911a/sensors-16-01882-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/73e58802ea33/sensors-16-01882-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/7bbd3e70bbc2/sensors-16-01882-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/c487837366f3/sensors-16-01882-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/addaef7cb565/sensors-16-01882-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/7ccc1105ff10/sensors-16-01882-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/45044dde3ca4/sensors-16-01882-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/3f9fc6a18b2d/sensors-16-01882-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/e22777370436/sensors-16-01882-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/f09e820e5df5/sensors-16-01882-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/c92ccbb35e6b/sensors-16-01882-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/f971fc536cc3/sensors-16-01882-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/f970deb4911a/sensors-16-01882-g003a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/73e58802ea33/sensors-16-01882-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/7bbd3e70bbc2/sensors-16-01882-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/c487837366f3/sensors-16-01882-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/addaef7cb565/sensors-16-01882-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/7ccc1105ff10/sensors-16-01882-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/45044dde3ca4/sensors-16-01882-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/3f9fc6a18b2d/sensors-16-01882-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/e22777370436/sensors-16-01882-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/65d2/5134541/f09e820e5df5/sensors-16-01882-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
Determination Method of Bridge Rotation Angle Response Using MEMS IMU.基于MEMS惯性测量单元的桥梁转角响应测定方法
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Nov 9;16(11):1882. doi: 10.3390/s16111882.
2
Technique for Determining Bridge Displacement Response Using MEMS Accelerometers.使用微机电系统(MEMS)加速度计确定桥梁位移响应的技术
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Feb 19;16(2):257. doi: 10.3390/s16020257.
3
MEMS IMU Error Mitigation Using Rotation Modulation Technique.基于旋转调制技术的微机电系统惯性测量单元误差抑制
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Nov 29;16(12):2017. doi: 10.3390/s16122017.
4
Self-Alignment MEMS IMU Method Based on the Rotation Modulation Technique on a Swing Base.基于摆动基座旋转调制技术的自对准微机电系统惯性测量单元方法
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Apr 12;18(4):1178. doi: 10.3390/s18041178.
5
Improving Observability of an Inertial System by Rotary Motions of an IMU.通过惯性测量单元的旋转运动提高惯性系统的可观测性。
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Mar 28;17(4):698. doi: 10.3390/s17040698.
6
A Novel Rotation Scheme for MEMS IMU Error Mitigation Based on a Missile-Borne Rotation Semi-Strapdown Inertial Navigation System.一种基于弹载旋转半捷联惯性导航系统的微机电系统惯性测量单元误差缓解新型旋转方案。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Apr 9;19(7):1683. doi: 10.3390/s19071683.
7
A bridge dynamic response analysis and load recognition method using traffic imaging.一种基于交通成像的桥梁动态响应分析与荷载识别方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 13;14(1):18742. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68888-5.
8
Analysis and Compensation of Modulation Angular Rate Error Based on Missile-Borne Rotation Semi-Strapdown Inertial Navigation System.基于弹载旋转半捷联惯性导航系统的调制角速率误差分析与补偿。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 May 4;18(5):1430. doi: 10.3390/s18051430.
9
Simple and efficient thermal calibration for MEMS gyroscopes.用于微机电系统(MEMS)陀螺仪的简单高效热校准
Med Eng Phys. 2018 May;55:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
10
Refactoring and Optimization of Bridge Dynamic Displacement Based on Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition.基于总体经验模态分解的桥梁动态位移重构与优化
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jul 15;19(14):3125. doi: 10.3390/s19143125.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Elastomer-Based Inclinometer for Ultrasensitive Bridge Rotation Measurement.一种基于新型弹性体的超高灵敏桥梁转角测量的测斜仪。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 1;22(7):2715. doi: 10.3390/s22072715.
2
Nondestructive Testing of the Miter Gates Using Various Measurement Methods.使用各种测量方法对人字门进行无损检测。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 21;20(6):1749. doi: 10.3390/s20061749.
3
Accelerometer Triad Calibration for Pole Tilt Compensation Using Variance Based Sensitivity Analysis.基于方差灵敏度分析的加速度计三体标定用于极轴倾斜补偿。

本文引用的文献

1
Technique for Determining Bridge Displacement Response Using MEMS Accelerometers.使用微机电系统(MEMS)加速度计确定桥梁位移响应的技术
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Feb 19;16(2):257. doi: 10.3390/s16020257.
2
A wireless MEMS-based inclinometer sensor node for structural health monitoring.一种用于结构健康监测的基于无线 MEMS 的倾斜传感器节点。
Sensors (Basel). 2013 Nov 26;13(12):16090-104. doi: 10.3390/s131216090.
3
Development of a wireless displacement measurement system using acceleration responses.利用加速度响应开发无线位移测量系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 8;20(5):1481. doi: 10.3390/s20051481.
4
Applying Sensor-Based Technology to Improve Construction Safety Management.应用基于传感器的技术来改善建筑安全管理。
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Aug 11;17(8):1841. doi: 10.3390/s17081841.
Sensors (Basel). 2013 Jul 1;13(7):8377-92. doi: 10.3390/s130708377.