Movement Science Group, OxINAHR, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;88(3):204-211. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-314508. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
Evidence for longer term exercise delivery for people with Parkinson's disease (PwP) is deficient.
Evaluate safety and adherence to a minimally supported community exercise intervention and estimate effect sizes (ES).
2-arm parallel phase II randomised controlled trial with blind assessment. PwP able to walk ≥100 m and with no contraindication to exercise were recruited from the Thames valley, UK, and randomised (1:1) to intervention (exercise) or control (handwriting) groups, via a concealed computer-generated list. Groups received a 6-month, twice weekly programme. Exercise was undertaken in community facilities (30 min aerobic and 30 min resistance) and handwriting at home, both were delivered through workbooks with monthly support visits. Primary outcome was a 2 min walk, with motor symptoms (Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, MDS-UPDRS III), fitness, health and well-being measured.
Between December 2011 and August 2013, n=53 (n=54 analysed) were allocated to exercise and n=52 (n=51 analysed) to handwriting. N=37 adhered to the exercise, most attending ≥1 session/week. Aerobic exercise was performed in 99% of attended sessions and resistance in 95%. Attrition and adverse events (AEs) were similar between groups, no serious AEs (n=2 exercise, n=3 handwriting) were related, exercise group-related AEs (n=2) did not discontinue intervention. Largest effects were for motor symptoms (2 min walk ES=0.20 (95% CI -0.44 to 0.45) and MDS-UPDRS III ES=-0.30 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.54)) in favour of exercise over the 12-month follow-up period. Some small effects were observed in fitness and well-being measures (ES>0.1).
PwP exercised safely and the possible long-term benefits observed support a substantive evaluation of this community programme.
NCT01439022.
针对帕金森病(PD)患者的长期运动疗法证据不足。
评估一种支持力度最小的社区运动干预措施的安全性和依从性,并估算效应量(ES)。
这是一项 2 臂平行、二期随机对照试验,采用盲法评估。研究对象为英国泰晤士河谷地区能够行走 ≥100m 且无运动禁忌的 PD 患者,他们被随机(1:1)分配至干预(运动)组或对照组(手写),通过隐藏的计算机生成列表进行分组。两组患者均接受为期 6 个月、每周 2 次的方案。运动在社区设施中进行(30min 有氧运动和 30min 抗阻运动),手写在家中进行,均通过带有每月支持访问的活页本进行。主要结局指标是 2min 步行,同时评估运动症状(运动障碍协会统一帕金森病评定量表,MDS-UPDRS III)、体能、健康状况和幸福感。
2011 年 12 月至 2013 年 8 月,共纳入 53 名(54 名分析)患者分配至运动组,52 名(51 名分析)患者分配至手写组。37 名患者坚持运动,大多数人每周参加 ≥1 次运动。有氧运动的出席率为 99%,抗阻运动的出席率为 95%。两组的脱落率和不良事件(AE)相似,无严重 AE(运动组 2 例,手写组 3 例)与试验相关,与运动组相关的 2 例 AE 并未导致患者退出干预。在 12 个月的随访期间,运动组在运动症状(2min 步行 ES=0.20(95%CI-0.44 至 0.45)和 MDS-UPDRS III ES=-0.30(95%CI 0.07 至 0.54))方面的效果最大,均优于对照组。体能和幸福感指标也观察到一些较小的效果(ES>0.1)。
PD 患者安全地进行了运动,观察到的可能长期获益支持对该社区运动方案进行更实质性的评估。
NCT01439022。