• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

投资“以孕妇为中心”™ 小组产前护理可降低新生儿住院成本。

Investing in CenteringPregnancy™ Group Prenatal Care Reduces Newborn Hospitalization Costs.

作者信息

Crockett Amy, Heberlein Emily C, Glasscock Leah, Covington-Kolb Sarah, Shea Karen, Khan Imtiaz A

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Greenville Health System, Greenville, South Carolina.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Greenville Health System, Greenville, South Carolina.

出版信息

Womens Health Issues. 2017 Jan-Feb;27(1):60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.whi.2016.09.009
PMID:27838034
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

CenteringPregnancy™ group prenatal care is an innovative model with promising evidence of reducing preterm birth. The outpatient costs of offering CenteringPregnancy pose barriers to model adoption. Enhanced provider reimbursement for group prenatal care may improve birth outcomes and generate newborn hospitalization cost savings for insurers. To investigate potential cost savings for investment in CenteringPregnancy, we evaluated the impact on newborn hospital admission costs of a pilot incentive project, where BlueChoice Health Plan South Carolina Medicaid managed care organization paid an obstetric practice offering CenteringPregnancy $175 for each patient who participated in at least five group prenatal care sessions.

METHODS

Using a one to many case-control matching without replacement, each CenteringPregnancy participant was matched retrospectively on propensity score, age, race, and clinical risk factors with five individual care participants. We estimated the odds of newborn hospital admission type (neonatal intensive care unit [NICU] or well-baby admission) for matched CenteringPregnancy and individual care cohorts with four or more visits using multivariate logistic regression. Cost savings were calculated using mean costs per admission type at the delivery hospital.

RESULTS

Of the CenteringPregnancy newborns, 3.5% had a NICU admission compared with 12.0% of individual care newborns (p < .001). Investing in CenteringPregnancy for 85 patients ($14,875) led to an estimated net savings for the managed care organization of $67,293 in NICU costs.

CONCLUSIONS

CenteringPregnancy may reduce costs through fewer NICU admissions. Enhanced reimbursement from payers to obstetric practices supporting CenteringPregnancy sustainability may improve birth outcomes and reduce associated NICU costs.

摘要

目的

“孕期集中护理”(CenteringPregnancy™)小组产前护理是一种创新模式,有证据表明其在降低早产率方面前景良好。提供“孕期集中护理”的门诊费用成为采用该模式的障碍。提高对小组产前护理的医疗服务提供者报销额度,可能会改善分娩结局,并为保险公司节省新生儿住院费用。为了调查投资“孕期集中护理”可能节省的成本,我们评估了一个试点激励项目对新生儿住院费用的影响,在该项目中,南卡罗来纳州蓝选择健康计划医疗补助管理式医疗组织向提供“孕期集中护理”的产科诊所支付费用,为每位至少参加五次小组产前护理的患者支付175美元。

方法

采用无放回的一对多病例对照匹配方法,根据倾向得分、年龄、种族和临床风险因素,对每位“孕期集中护理”参与者与五名接受个体护理的参与者进行回顾性匹配。我们使用多变量逻辑回归估计了接受四次或更多次就诊的匹配的“孕期集中护理”队列和个体护理队列的新生儿住院类型(新生儿重症监护病房 [NICU] 或健康婴儿住院)的几率。使用分娩医院每种住院类型的平均费用计算成本节省情况。

结果

“孕期集中护理”的新生儿中,3.5%入住NICU,而个体护理的新生儿中这一比例为12.0%(p <.001)。对85名患者投资“孕期集中护理”(14,875美元),预计为管理式医疗组织节省NICU成本67,293美元。

结论

“孕期集中护理”可能通过减少NICU入院来降低成本。付款人提高对支持“孕期集中护理”可持续性的产科诊所的报销额度,可能会改善分娩结局并降低相关的NICU成本。

相似文献

1
Investing in CenteringPregnancy™ Group Prenatal Care Reduces Newborn Hospitalization Costs.投资“以孕妇为中心”™ 小组产前护理可降低新生儿住院成本。
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Jan-Feb;27(1):60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
2
Group Prenatal Care Results in Medicaid Savings with Better Outcomes: A Propensity Score Analysis of CenteringPregnancy Participation in South Carolina.群组产前护理可节省医疗补助并带来更好的结果:南卡罗来纳州孕期中心参与情况的倾向得分分析
Matern Child Health J. 2016 Jul;20(7):1384-93. doi: 10.1007/s10995-016-1935-y.
3
The Impact of CenteringPregnancy Group Prenatal Care on Birth Outcomes in Medicaid Eligible Women.《中心孕期护理小组对符合医疗补助资格的女性分娩结局的影响》。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Jul;28(7):919-928. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7469. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
4
Outcomes of Latina women in CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care compared with individual prenatal care.拉美裔女性在集中妊娠组产前护理中的结局与个体产前护理的比较。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 Jul-Aug;58(4):396-403. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12000. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
5
Group prenatal care.群体产前保健。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;216(6):552-556. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
6
Group Prenatal Care Reduces Risk of Preterm Birth and Low Birth Weight: A Matched Cohort Study.团体产前保健可降低早产和低出生体重风险:一项匹配队列研究。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Jan;28(1):17-22. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6817. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
7
Does prenatal care decrease the incidence and cost of neonatal intensive care admissions?产前护理能否降低新生儿重症监护病房入院率及费用?
Am J Perinatol. 1992 Jul;9(4):281-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994790.
8
Prenatal care and infant birth outcomes among Medicaid recipients.医疗补助受助者的产前护理与婴儿出生结局
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2003 May;14(2):272-89. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2010.0734.
9
Medicaid costs and birth outcomes: the effects of prenatal WIC participation and the use of prenatal care.医疗补助成本与出生结局:孕期参与妇女、婴儿与儿童营养补充计划及产前护理使用情况的影响
J Policy Anal Manage. 1992 Fall;11(4):573-92.
10
Association of the Affordable Care Act Dependent Coverage Provision With Prenatal Care Use and Birth Outcomes.《平价医疗法案》受抚养人保险条款与产前护理利用及出生结局的关联
JAMA. 2018 Feb 13;319(6):579-587. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0030.

引用本文的文献

1
Study protocol of group antenatal care implementation at a public women's hospital in Brazil.巴西一家公立妇产医院实施的群体产前护理研究方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0326084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326084. eCollection 2025.
2
The Effects of CenteringPregnancy: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation.“以孕妇为中心”项目的效果:一项准实验评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 3;13(9):1052. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13091052.
3
Implementation and evaluation of the centering pregnancy group prenatal care model in pregnant women with diabetes: a convergent parallel mixed methods study protocol.
实施与评价以集中护理为基础的群组产前护理模式在妊娠糖尿病孕妇中的应用:一项汇聚式平行混合方法研究方案。
Reprod Health. 2024 Apr 18;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01792-3.
4
Group prenatal care successes, challenges, and frameworks for scaling up: a case study in adopting health care innovations.群体产前护理的成功经验、挑战及扩大规模的框架:采用医疗保健创新的案例研究
Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Mar 4;5(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00556-1.
5
National assessment of obstetrics and gynecology and family medicine residents' experiences with CenteringPregnancy group prenatal care.全国妇产科和家庭医学住院医师对“孕中关怀”小组产前护理的体验评估。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Nov 21;23(1):805. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06124-0.
6
Enhanced Perinatal Programs for People in Prisons: A Summary of Six States' Programs.针对监狱服刑人员的强化围产期项目:六个州项目总结
J Crim Justice. 2022 Nov-Dec;83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101965. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
7
Regarding "Burden of Comorbidities and Healthcare Resource Utilization Among Medicaid-Enrolled Extremely Premature Infants".关于“医疗补助计划覆盖的极早产儿的合并症负担与医疗资源利用情况”
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2023 Apr 4;10(1):77-79. doi: 10.36469/001c.73989. eCollection 2023.
8
Explaining the Black-White Disparity in Preterm Birth: A Consensus Statement From a Multi-Disciplinary Scientific Work Group Convened by the March of Dimes.解释早产方面的黑白差异:由美国疾病控制与预防中心(March of Dimes)召集的多学科科学工作组达成的共识声明。
Front Reprod Health. 2021 Sep 2;3:684207. doi: 10.3389/frph.2021.684207. eCollection 2021.
9
An effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 trial assessing the impact of group versus individual antenatal care on maternal and infant outcomes in Malawi.评估马拉维以小组或个人形式进行产前护理对母婴结局影响的有效性-实施混合 1 型试验。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8276-x.
10
Group Prenatal Care Attendance and Women's Characteristics Associated with Low Attendance: Results from Centering and Racial Disparities (CRADLE Study).小组产前保健参与度及与低参与度相关的妇女特征:来自以妇女为中心和种族差异(CRADLE 研究)的结果。
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Oct;23(10):1371-1381. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02784-7.