Suppr超能文献

评估马拉维以小组或个人形式进行产前护理对母婴结局影响的有效性-实施混合 1 型试验。

An effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 trial assessing the impact of group versus individual antenatal care on maternal and infant outcomes in Malawi.

机构信息

University of Malawi, Kamuzu College of Nursing, PO Box 415, Blantyre, Malawi.

Johns Hopkins University, School of Nursing, 525 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8276-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sub-Saharan Africa has the world's highest rates of maternal and perinatal mortality and accounts for two-thirds of new HIV infections and 25% of preterm births. Antenatal care, as the entry point into the health system for many women, offers an opportunity to provide life-saving monitoring, health promotion, and health system linkages. Change is urgently needed, because potential benefits of antenatal care are not realized when pregnant women experience long wait times and short visits with inconsistent provisioning of essential services and minimal health promotion, especially for HIV prevention. This study answers WHO's call for the rigorous study of group antenatal care as a transformative model that provides a positive pregnancy experience and improves outcomes.

METHODS

Using a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation design, we test the effectiveness of group antenatal care by comparing it to individual care across 6 clinics in Blantyre District, Malawi. Our first aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of group antenatal care through 6 months postpartum. We hypothesize that women in group care and their infants will have less morbidity and mortality and more positive HIV prevention outcomes. We will test hypotheses using multi-level hierarchical models using data from repeated surveys (four time points) and health records. Guided by the consolidated framework for implementation research, our second aim is to identify contextual factors related to clinic-level degree of implementation success. Analyses use within and across-case matrices.

DISCUSSION

This high-impact study addresses three global health priorities, including maternal and infant mortality, HIV prevention, and improved quality of antenatal care. Results will provide rigorous evidence documenting the effectiveness and scalability of group antenatal care. If results are negative, governments will avoid spending on less effective care. If our study shows positive health impacts in Malawi, the results will provide strong evidence and valuable lessons learned for widespread scale-up in other low-resource settings. Positive maternal, neonatal, and HIV-related outcomes will save lives, impact the quality of antenatal care, and influence health policy as governments make decisions about whether to adopt this innovative healthcare model.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT03673709. Registered on September 17, 2018.

摘要

背景

撒哈拉以南非洲地区拥有全世界最高的孕产妇和围产期死亡率,占全世界三分之二的新 HIV 感染病例和 25%的早产率。作为许多女性进入医疗体系的切入点,产前护理提供了一个提供救命监测、促进健康和建立医疗体系联系的机会。变革迫在眉睫,因为当孕妇面临漫长的等待时间和短暂的就诊时间、基本服务提供不一致以及最小化的健康促进时,产前护理的潜在好处无法实现,尤其是在预防 HIV 方面。本研究响应了世界卫生组织的号召,严格研究小组产前护理作为一种变革性模式,为孕妇提供积极的怀孕体验并改善结果。

方法

我们采用混合类型 1 有效性实施设计,通过在马拉维布兰太尔区的 6 家诊所将小组产前护理与个体护理进行比较,来测试小组产前护理的有效性。我们的第一个目标是通过产后 6 个月评估小组产前护理的有效性。我们假设小组护理中的女性及其婴儿的发病率和死亡率会更低,预防 HIV 的效果会更好。我们将使用多水平层次模型和重复调查(四个时间点)和健康记录的数据来检验假设。在实施研究综合框架的指导下,我们的第二个目标是确定与诊所实施成功程度相关的背景因素。分析使用了案例内和案例间矩阵。

讨论

这项高影响力的研究针对三个全球健康优先事项,包括孕产妇和婴儿死亡率、HIV 预防以及改善产前护理质量。结果将提供关于小组产前护理有效性和可扩展性的严格证据。如果结果为阴性,政府将避免在效果较差的护理上花费。如果我们的研究在马拉维显示出对健康的积极影响,结果将为在其他资源匮乏的环境中广泛推广提供有力的证据和宝贵的经验教训。积极的母婴、新生儿和与 HIV 相关的结果将拯救生命、影响产前护理质量,并影响政府在是否采用这种创新医疗模式方面的健康政策。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号 NCT03673709。注册于 2018 年 9 月 17 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/263a/7008527/1e15bd701300/12889_2020_8276_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验