• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用一种确定前倾角的新方法评估髋臼假体位置的准确性。

The Accuracy of Acetabular Component Position Using a Novel Method to Determine Anteversion.

作者信息

Boettner Friedrich, Zingg Matthieu, Emara Ahmed K, Waldstein Wenzel, Faschingbauer Martin, Kasparek Maximilian F

机构信息

Adult Reconstruction & Joint Replacement Division, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.

Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Genève 14, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1180-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.004
PMID:27839959
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compares the differences in acetabular component position, leg length discrepancy, and hip offset between the anterior and posterior approach. A novel method is applied to determine the acetabular anteversion using the C-arm tilt angle for the anterior approach.

METHODS

Hundred consecutive anterior total hip arthroplasties were matched according to gender, body mass index, and age to a cohort of 100 primary total hip arthroplasties operated on through a posterior approach. Postoperative radiographs were analyzed to determine cup inclination, cup anteversion, leg length discrepancy, and hip offset.

RESULTS

The mean inclination was 40.8° (range 33°-48°) and 45.1° (range 33°-55°) for the anterior and posterior approach, respectively. Using the new C-arm tilt plane technique, an average acetabular anteversion of 18.4° (range 11°-26°) was achieved with the anterior approach compared with 23.6° (range 8°-38°) with the posterior approach. Hundred percent cups in the anterior group and 81% in the posterior group fell within the safe zone (P < .001). There was no difference in the overall hip offset between the operated side and the contralateral side for the anterior (P = .074) and posterior (P = .919) group. There was no difference in leg length discrepancy between the 2 approaches (P = .259).

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative fluoroscopy-assisted direct anterior approach was associated with improved acetabular component positioning. However, no benefit was shown with regards to restoration of hip offset or leg length.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了前路和后路手术在髋臼假体位置、肢体长度差异和髋关节偏移方面的差异。一种新方法被应用于通过C型臂倾斜角度来确定前路手术时髋臼的前倾角。

方法

根据性别、体重指数和年龄,将连续100例前路全髋关节置换术与100例通过后路进行的初次全髋关节置换术进行匹配。分析术后X线片以确定髋臼倾斜度、髋臼前倾角、肢体长度差异和髋关节偏移。

结果

前路和后路手术的平均倾斜度分别为40.8°(范围33°-48°)和45.1°(范围33°-55°)。采用新的C型臂倾斜平面技术,前路手术的髋臼平均前倾角为18.4°(范围11°-26°),而后路手术为23.6°(范围8°-38°)。前路组100%的髋臼杯和后路组81%的髋臼杯落在安全区内(P <.001)。前路组(P = 0.074)和后路组(P = 0.919)手术侧与对侧的总体髋关节偏移无差异。两种手术方法在肢体长度差异方面无差异(P = 0.259)。

结论

术中透视辅助下的直接前路手术与改善髋臼假体定位相关。然而,在恢复髋关节偏移或肢体长度方面未显示出益处。

相似文献

1
The Accuracy of Acetabular Component Position Using a Novel Method to Determine Anteversion.使用一种确定前倾角的新方法评估髋臼假体位置的准确性。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1180-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 12.
2
Does Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Improve Limb-Length Discrepancy and Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty?术中透视是否能改善直接前路全髋关节置换术中肢体长度差异和髋臼组件位置?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Sep;33(9):2927-2931. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 28.
3
Does Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Optimize Limb Length and the Precision of Acetabular Positioning in Primary THA?术中透视能否优化初次全髋关节置换术中肢体长度及髋臼定位精度?
Orthopedics. 2015 May;38(5):e380-6. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20150504-54.
4
Intraoperative evaluation of acetabular cup position during anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: are we accurately interpreting?前路全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯位置的术中评估:我们的解读准确吗?
Hip Int. 2020 Jan;30(1):40-47. doi: 10.1177/1120700019868665. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
5
Adoption of Robotic vs Fluoroscopic Guidance in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is Acetabular Positioning Improved in the Learning Curve?全髋关节置换术中机器人引导与透视引导的应用:在学习曲线中髋臼位置是否得到改善?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.039. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
6
Fluoroscopically Guided Acetabular Component Positioning: Does It Reduce the Risk of Malpositioning in Obese Patients?X 线透视引导下髋臼组件定位:是否能降低肥胖患者的定位不良风险?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3052-3055. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.045. Epub 2017 May 5.
7
Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach?与非导向的后入路相比,髋关节置换术前路透视是否会降低髋臼杯的可变性?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1877-85. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3512-2. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
8
Fluoroscopy assessment during anterior minimally invasive hip replacement is more accurate than with the posterior approach.在前路微创髋关节置换术中,透视评估比后路手术更准确。
Int Orthop. 2016 Jan;40(1):21-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2803-x. Epub 2015 May 10.
9
Supine versus lateral position for accurate positioning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson-Jones approach: A randomized single-blind controlled trial.改良 Watson-Jones 入路全髋关节置换术中仰卧位与侧卧位对髋臼杯准确定位的比较:一项随机单盲对照试验。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Sep;105(5):915-922. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
10
Accuracy of Component Placement in Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty.机器人辅助全髋关节置换术中假体植入的准确性。
Orthopedics. 2016 May 1;39(3):193-9. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160404-06. Epub 2016 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraoperative measurement of cup inclination using fluoroscopy: do we need a different correction factor when using a different C-arm model.使用荧光透视法术中测量髋臼杯倾斜度:使用不同的C型臂模型时,我们是否需要不同的校正因子?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Apr 1;145(1):220. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05833-9.
2
A novel patient-specific free-hand method using fluoroscopic templating for accurate cup placement in supine position total hip arthroplasty.一种新颖的针对患者个体的徒手方法,该方法使用透视模板在仰卧位全髋关节置换术中精确放置髋臼杯。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Mar 21;145(1):205. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05828-6.
3
Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Versus Navigation to Determine Cup Anteversion in Direct Anterior Total Hip Replacement: A Technical Trick for Obtaining "True" Anteversion.
术中透视与导航在直接前路全髋关节置换术中确定髋臼前倾角的比较:获得“真实”前倾角的一项技术技巧
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Jun 5;27:101426. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101426. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Achieving Precise Cup Positioning in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.直接前路全髋关节置换术中精确杯位的实现:一篇叙述性综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 31;59(2):271. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020271.
5
Handheld Navigation Improves Accuracy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Replacement.手持导航提高直接前路全髋关节置换术的准确性。
Arthroplast Today. 2022 Aug 15;17:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.06.016. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
The direct anterior approach to the hip: a useful tool in experienced hands or just another approach?髋关节直接前路入路:经验丰富者手中的有用工具还是另一种入路方式?
Arthroplasty. 2022 Jan 2;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s42836-021-00104-5.
7
A standardized soft tissue release technique to lower the risk of greater trochanteric fractures for the anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty.一种标准化的软组织松解技术,可降低全髋关节置换术前路中转子下骨折的风险。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Nov;142(11):3067-3073. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03919-8. Epub 2021 May 5.
8
Can a simple iPad app improve C-arm based component position in anterior THA?一个简单的 iPad 应用程序能否改善前路髋关节置换术中基于 C 臂的组件位置?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Aug;141(8):1401-1409. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03807-1. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
9
Lewinnek Safe Zone References are Frequently Misquoted.勒温内克安全区参考值经常被错误引用。
Arthroplast Today. 2020 Nov 26;6(4):945-953. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.09.011. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
Does the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy improve postoperative radiographic component positioning and implant size in total hip arthroplasty utilizing a direct anterior approach?在采用直接前路入路的全髋关节置换术中,使用术中透视是否能改善术后影像学上的假体组件定位和植入物尺寸?
Arthroplast Today. 2019 Dec 28;6(1):94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2019.11.006. eCollection 2020 Mar.