Crawford Sara, Boulet Sheree L, Kawwass Jennifer F, Jamieson Denise J, Kissin Dmitry M
Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Fertil Steril. 2017 Jan;107(1):110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
To compare characteristics, explore predictors, and compare assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle, transfer, and pregnancy outcomes of autologous and donor cryopreserved oocyte cycles with fresh oocyte cycles.
Retrospective cohort study from the National ART Surveillance System.
Fertility treatment centers.
PATIENT(S): Fresh embryo cycles initiated in 2013 utilizing embryos created with fresh and cryopreserved, autologous and donor oocytes.
INTERVENTION(S): Cryopreservation of oocytes versus fresh.
MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): Cancellation, implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates per cycle, transfer, and/or pregnancy.
RESULT(S): There was no evidence of differences in cancellation, implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, or live birth rates between autologous fresh and cryopreserved oocyte cycles. Donor cryopreserved oocyte cycles had a decreased risk of cancellation before transfer (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.96) as well as decreased likelihood of pregnancy (aRR 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.95) and live birth (aRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80-0.95); however, there was no evidence of differences in implantation, pregnancy, or live birth rates when cycles were restricted to those proceeding to transfer. Donor cryopreserved oocyte cycles proceeding to pregnancy had a decreased risk of miscarriage (aRR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97) and higher live birth rate (aRR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09) with the transfer of one embryo, but higher miscarriage rate (aRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.54) and lower live birth rate (aRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.99) with the transfer of two or more.
CONCLUSION(S): There was no evidence of differences in ART outcomes between autologous fresh and cryopreserved oocyte cycles. There was evidence of differences in per-cycle and per-pregnancy outcomes between donor cryopreserved and fresh oocyte cycles, but not in per-transfer outcomes.
比较自体和供体冷冻卵母细胞周期与新鲜卵母细胞周期的特征,探索预测因素,并比较辅助生殖技术(ART)周期、移植及妊娠结局。
来自国家ART监测系统的回顾性队列研究。
生育治疗中心。
2013年开始的新鲜胚胎周期,使用新鲜和冷冻的自体及供体卵母细胞所创建的胚胎。
卵母细胞冷冻与新鲜卵母细胞的对比。
每个周期、移植及/或妊娠的取消率、着床率、妊娠率、流产率和活产率。
自体新鲜和冷冻卵母细胞周期在取消率、着床率、妊娠率、流产率或活产率方面无差异。供体冷冻卵母细胞周期在移植前取消的风险降低(调整风险比[aRR]0.74,95%置信区间[CI]0.57 - 0.96),妊娠可能性降低(aRR 0.88,95% CI 0.81 - 0.95),活产可能性降低(aRR 0.87,95% CI 0.80 - 0.95);然而,当周期仅限于进行移植的周期时,在着床率、妊娠率或活产率方面无差异。进行妊娠的供体冷冻卵母细胞周期,移植一个胚胎时流产风险降低(aRR 0.75,95% CI 0.58 - 0.97),活产率较高(aRR 1.05,95% CI 1.01 - 1.09),但移植两个或更多胚胎时流产率较高(aRR 1.28,95% CI 1.07 - 1.54),活产率较低(aRR 0.95,95% CI 0.92 - 0.99)。
自体新鲜和冷冻卵母细胞周期在ART结局方面无差异。供体冷冻和新鲜卵母细胞周期在每个周期和每次妊娠结局方面存在差异,但在每次移植结局方面无差异。