Epstein Nancy E
Department of Neuroscience, Winthrop Neuroscience, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA.
Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Sep 22;7(Suppl 25):S652-S655. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.191070. eCollection 2016.
There are frequent reports of lumbosacral plexus and other neurological injuries occurring with extreme lateral interbody fusions (XLIF) and other related lateral lumbar techniques.
This review focuses on the new neurological deficits (e.g. lumbosacral plexus, root injuries) that occur following minimally invasive surgery (MIS) XLIF and other related lateral lumbar techniques.
A review of multiple articles revealed the following ranges of new postoperative neurological complications for XLIF procedures: plexus injuries 13.28%; sensory deficits 0-75% (permanent in 62.5%); motor deficits 0.7-33.6%; anterior thigh pain 12.5-25%. Of interest, in a study by Lykissas ., the frequency of long-term neural injury following lateral lumber interbody fusion (LLIF) with BMP-2 (72 patients) was much higher than for LLIF performed with autograft/allograft (72 patients). The addition of bone morphogenetic protein led to persistent sensory deficits in 29 vs. 20 without BMP; persistent motor deficits in 35 with vs. 17 without BMP; and persistent anterior thigh/groin pain in 8 with vs. 0 without BMP. They should also have noted the unacceptably high incidence of neural injury occurring with LLIF alone without BMP.
This review highlights the high risk of neural injury (up to 75% for sensory, 33.6% for motor, and an overall plexus injury rate of 13.28%) utilizing the XLIF and other similar lateral lumbar approaches. With such extensive neurological injuries, is the XLIF really safe, and should it still be performed?
有频繁报道称,在极外侧椎间融合术(XLIF)及其他相关的腰椎外侧技术中会发生腰骶丛及其他神经损伤。
本综述聚焦于微创XLIF及其他相关腰椎外侧技术术后出现的新的神经功能缺损(如腰骶丛、神经根损伤)。
对多篇文章的综述揭示了XLIF手术术后新的神经并发症的以下发生率范围:丛损伤13.28%;感觉缺损0 - 75%(永久性的占62.5%);运动缺损0.7 - 33.6%;大腿前侧疼痛12.5 - 25%。有趣的是,在Lykissas等人的一项研究中,使用骨形态发生蛋白-2(BMP-2)进行腰椎外侧椎间融合术(LLIF)(72例患者)后长期神经损伤的发生率远高于使用自体移植物/同种异体移植物进行LLIF(72例患者)。添加骨形态发生蛋白导致29例出现持续性感觉缺损,而未使用BMP的为20例;35例出现持续性运动缺损,未使用BMP的为17例;8例出现持续性大腿前侧/腹股沟疼痛,未使用BMP的为0例。他们还应注意到,单独进行LLIF而不使用BMP时神经损伤的发生率高得令人无法接受。
本综述强调了使用XLIF及其他类似腰椎外侧入路时神经损伤的高风险(感觉损伤高达75%,运动损伤高达33.6%,总体丛损伤率为13.28%)。出现如此广泛的神经损伤,XLIF真的安全吗,还应该继续进行吗?