Suppr超能文献

极外侧腰椎椎间融合术及相关技术的高神经并发症发生率:安全性问题综述

High neurological complication rates for extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion and related techniques: A review of safety concerns.

作者信息

Epstein Nancy E

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Winthrop Neuroscience, Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA.

出版信息

Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Sep 22;7(Suppl 25):S652-S655. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.191070. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are frequent reports of lumbosacral plexus and other neurological injuries occurring with extreme lateral interbody fusions (XLIF) and other related lateral lumbar techniques.

METHODS

This review focuses on the new neurological deficits (e.g. lumbosacral plexus, root injuries) that occur following minimally invasive surgery (MIS) XLIF and other related lateral lumbar techniques.

RESULTS

A review of multiple articles revealed the following ranges of new postoperative neurological complications for XLIF procedures: plexus injuries 13.28%; sensory deficits 0-75% (permanent in 62.5%); motor deficits 0.7-33.6%; anterior thigh pain 12.5-25%. Of interest, in a study by Lykissas ., the frequency of long-term neural injury following lateral lumber interbody fusion (LLIF) with BMP-2 (72 patients) was much higher than for LLIF performed with autograft/allograft (72 patients). The addition of bone morphogenetic protein led to persistent sensory deficits in 29 vs. 20 without BMP; persistent motor deficits in 35 with vs. 17 without BMP; and persistent anterior thigh/groin pain in 8 with vs. 0 without BMP. They should also have noted the unacceptably high incidence of neural injury occurring with LLIF alone without BMP.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the high risk of neural injury (up to 75% for sensory, 33.6% for motor, and an overall plexus injury rate of 13.28%) utilizing the XLIF and other similar lateral lumbar approaches. With such extensive neurological injuries, is the XLIF really safe, and should it still be performed?

摘要

背景

有频繁报道称,在极外侧椎间融合术(XLIF)及其他相关的腰椎外侧技术中会发生腰骶丛及其他神经损伤。

方法

本综述聚焦于微创XLIF及其他相关腰椎外侧技术术后出现的新的神经功能缺损(如腰骶丛、神经根损伤)。

结果

对多篇文章的综述揭示了XLIF手术术后新的神经并发症的以下发生率范围:丛损伤13.28%;感觉缺损0 - 75%(永久性的占62.5%);运动缺损0.7 - 33.6%;大腿前侧疼痛12.5 - 25%。有趣的是,在Lykissas等人的一项研究中,使用骨形态发生蛋白-2(BMP-2)进行腰椎外侧椎间融合术(LLIF)(72例患者)后长期神经损伤的发生率远高于使用自体移植物/同种异体移植物进行LLIF(72例患者)。添加骨形态发生蛋白导致29例出现持续性感觉缺损,而未使用BMP的为20例;35例出现持续性运动缺损,未使用BMP的为17例;8例出现持续性大腿前侧/腹股沟疼痛,未使用BMP的为0例。他们还应注意到,单独进行LLIF而不使用BMP时神经损伤的发生率高得令人无法接受。

结论

本综述强调了使用XLIF及其他类似腰椎外侧入路时神经损伤的高风险(感觉损伤高达75%,运动损伤高达33.6%,总体丛损伤率为13.28%)。出现如此广泛的神经损伤,XLIF真的安全吗,还应该继续进行吗?

相似文献

1
High neurological complication rates for extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion and related techniques: A review of safety concerns.
Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Sep 22;7(Suppl 25):S652-S655. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.191070. eCollection 2016.
2
Review of Risks and Complications of Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF).
Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Dec 6;10:237. doi: 10.25259/SNI_559_2019. eCollection 2019.
3
More nerve root injuries occur with minimally invasive lumbar surgery, especially extreme lateral interbody fusion: A review.
Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Jan 25;7(Suppl 3):S83-95. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.174895. eCollection 2016.
7
Nerve injury after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 919 treated levels with identification of risk factors.
Spine J. 2014 May 1;14(5):749-58. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.066. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
8
Extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion: Do the cons outweigh the pros?
Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Sep 22;7(Suppl 25):S692-S700. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.191079. eCollection 2016.
10
Use of motor evoked potentials during lateral lumbar interbody fusion reduces postoperative deficits.
Spine J. 2018 Oct;18(10):1763-1778. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.024. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion.
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Feb 24;19(S1):S7-S18. doi: 10.14444/8711.
3
The Evolution of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Journey from Past to Present.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 23;60(3):378. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030378.
7
L4/5 accessibility for extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a radiological study.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Nov 11;17(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03320-0.
10
Localization of the Lumbar Plexus in the Psoas Muscle: Considerations for Avoiding Lumbar Plexus Injury during the Transpsoas Approach.
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2020 Aug 20;5(2):86-90. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2020-0074. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

2
More nerve root injuries occur with minimally invasive lumbar surgery: Let's tell someone.
Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Jan 25;7(Suppl 3):S96-S101. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.174896. eCollection 2016.
3
More nerve root injuries occur with minimally invasive lumbar surgery, especially extreme lateral interbody fusion: A review.
Surg Neurol Int. 2016 Jan 25;7(Suppl 3):S83-95. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.174895. eCollection 2016.
4
Outcomes of Two Different Techniques Using the Lateral Approach for Lumbar Interbody Arthrodesis.
Global Spine J. 2015 Aug;5(4):308-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1546816. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
5
Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion stratified by preoperative diagnosis.
Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24 Suppl 3:322-30. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3840-2. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
6
Extreme lateral approach to the spine in degenerative and post traumatic lumbar diseases: selection process, results and complications.
Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23 Suppl 6:684-92. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3545-y. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
8
Analysis of lumbar plexopathies and nerve injury after lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: diagnostic standardization.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Mar;18(3):289-97. doi: 10.3171/2012.11.SPINE12755. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
9
A comparison of complication rate between anterior and lateral approaches to the lumbar spine.
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2014;158(1):127-32. doi: 10.5507/bp.2012.079. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
10
Contralateral femoral nerve compression: An unrecognized complication after extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF).
J Clin Neurosci. 2011 Jan;18(1):149-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.07.109. Epub 2010 Oct 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验