SafePassage Patient Monitoring Services LLC, 915 Broadway Suite 1200, New York, NY 10010, USA.
SafePassage Patient Monitoring Services LLC, 915 Broadway Suite 1200, New York, NY 10010, USA.
Spine J. 2018 Oct;18(10):1763-1778. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.024. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has gained rather widespread acceptance as a method to mitigate risk to the lumbar plexus during lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) surgery. The most common approach to IONM involves using only electromyography (EMG) monitoring, and the rate of postoperative deficit remains unacceptably high. Other test modalities, such as transcranial electric motor-evoked potentials (tcMEPs) and somatosensory-evoked potentials, may be more suitable for monitoring neural integrity, but they have not been widely adopted during LLIF. Recent studies have begun to examine their utility in monitoring LLIF surgery with favorable results.
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of different IONM paradigms in the prevention of iatrogenic neurologic sequelae during LLIF and to specifically evaluate the utility of including tcMEPs in an IONM strategy for LLIF surgery.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A non-randomized, retrospective analysis of 479 LLIF procedures at a single institution over a 4-year period was conducted. During the study epoch, three different IONM strategies were used for LLIF procedures: (1) surgeon-directed T-EMG monitoring ("SD-EMG"), (2) neurophysiologist-controlled T-EMG monitoring ("NC-EMG"), and (3) neurophysiologist-controlled T-EMG monitoring supplemented with MEP monitoring ("NC-MEP").
The patient population comprised 254 men (53.5%) and 221 women (46.5%). Patient age ranged from a minimum of 21 years to a maximum of 89 years, with a mean of 56.6 years.
Physician-documented physiological measures included manual muscle test grading of hip-flexion, hip-adduction, or knee-extension, as well as hypo- or hyperesthesia of the groin or anterolateral thigh on the surgical side. Self-reported measures included numbness or tingling in the groin or anterolateral thigh on the surgical side.
Patient progress notes were reviewed from the postoperative period up to 12 months after surgery. The rates of postoperative sensory-motor deficit consistent with lumbar plexopathy or peripheral nerve palsy on the surgical side were compared between the three cohorts.
Using the dependent measure of neurologic deficit, whether motor or sensory, patients with NC-MEP monitoring had the lowest rate of immediate postoperative deficit (22.3%) compared with NC-EMG monitoring (37.1%) and SD-EMG monitoring (40.4%). This result extended to sensory deficits consistent with lumbar plexopathy (pure motor deficits being excluded); patients with NC-MEP monitoring had the lowest rate (20.5%) compared with NC-EMG monitoring (34.3%) and SD-EMG monitoring (36.9%). Additionally, evaluation of postoperative motor deficits consistent with peripheral nerve palsy (pure sensory deficits being excluded) revealed that the NC-MEP group had the lowest rate (5.7%) of motor deficit compared with the SD-EMG (17.0%) and NC-EMG (17.1%) cohorts. Finally, when assessing only those patients whose last follow-up was greater than or equal to 12 months (n=251), the rate of unresolved motor deficits was significantly lower in the NC-MEP group (0.9%) compared with NC-EMG (6.9%) and SD-EMG (11.0%). A comparison of the NC-MEP versus NC-EMG and SD-EMG groups, both independently and combined, was statistically significant (>95% confidence level) for all analyses.
The results of the present study indicate that preservation of tcMEPs from the adductor longus, quadriceps, and tibialis anterior muscles are of paramount importance for limiting iatrogenic sensory and motor injuries during LLIF surgery. In this regard, the inclusion of tcMEPs serves to compliment EMG and allows for the periodic, functional assessment of at-risk nerves during these procedures. Thus, tcMEPs appear to be the most effective modality for the prevention of both transient and permanent neurologic injury during LLIF surgery. We propose that the standard paradigm for protecting the nervous system during LLIF be adapted to include tcMEPs.
术中神经生理监测(IONM)作为降低侧方腰椎椎间融合术(LLIF)中腰丛风险的方法,已得到广泛认可。IONM 最常见的方法涉及仅使用肌电图(EMG)监测,术后功能缺损的发生率仍然高得不可接受。其他测试模式,如经颅电运动诱发电位(tcMEPs)和体感诱发电位,可能更适合监测神经完整性,但在 LLIF 中尚未广泛采用。最近的研究开始研究它们在监测 LLIF 手术中的效用,结果令人满意。
本研究旨在评估不同 IONM 方案在预防 LLIF 中医源性神经后遗症方面的疗效,并特别评估在 LLIF 手术中加入 tcMEPs 的 IONM 策略的效用。
研究设计/设置:对一家机构 4 年内的 479 例 LLIF 手术进行了非随机、回顾性分析。在研究期间,使用了三种不同的 IONM 策略进行 LLIF 手术:(1)外科医生指导的 T-EMG 监测(“SD-EMG”),(2)神经生理学家控制的 T-EMG 监测(“NC-EMG”),和(3)神经生理学家控制的 T-EMG 监测补充肌电图监测(“NC-MEP”)。
患者人群包括 254 名男性(53.5%)和 221 名女性(46.5%)。患者年龄从 21 岁到 89 岁不等,平均年龄为 56.6 岁。
医生记录的生理测量包括髋关节屈伸、髋关节内收或膝关节伸展的手动肌肉测试分级,以及手术侧腹股沟或前外侧大腿的感觉减退或感觉过敏。自我报告的测量包括手术侧腹股沟或前外侧大腿的麻木或刺痛感。
回顾术后期间直至手术后 12 个月的患者病历。比较三组患者手术侧出现符合腰丛病变或周围神经麻痹的术后感觉运动功能障碍的发生率。
使用神经功能障碍的依赖测量,无论是运动还是感觉,接受 NC-MEP 监测的患者术后即刻出现功能障碍的发生率最低(22.3%),与 NC-EMG 监测(37.1%)和 SD-EMG 监测(40.4%)相比。这一结果扩展到符合腰丛病变的感觉缺失(排除单纯运动缺失);接受 NC-MEP 监测的患者发生率最低(20.5%),与 NC-EMG 监测(34.3%)和 SD-EMG 监测(36.9%)相比。此外,评估与周围神经麻痹一致的术后运动缺失(排除单纯感觉缺失)显示,NC-MEP 组的运动缺失发生率最低(5.7%),与 SD-EMG(17.0%)和 NC-EMG(17.1%)组相比。最后,当仅评估最后随访时间大于或等于 12 个月的患者(n=251)时,NC-MEP 组的未解决运动功能障碍发生率明显低于 NC-EMG 组(0.9%)和 SD-EMG 组(11.0%)。NC-MEP 与 NC-EMG 和 SD-EMG 组的比较,无论是独立的还是联合的,在所有分析中均具有统计学意义(>95%置信水平)。
本研究结果表明,保留内收长肌、股四头肌和胫骨前肌的 tcMEPs 对于限制 LLIF 手术中医源性感觉和运动损伤至关重要。在这方面,包括 tcMEPs 有助于补充 EMG,并允许在这些手术过程中定期对高危神经进行功能评估。因此,tcMEPs 似乎是预防 LLIF 手术中短暂性和永久性神经损伤的最有效方法。我们建议将保护神经系统的标准方案适应包括 tcMEPs。