Bodelle Boris, Luboldt Wolfgang, Wichmann Julian L, Fischer Sebastian, Vogl Thomas J, Beeres Martin
Goethe University of Frankfurt, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Eur J Radiol Open. 2016 Nov 3;3:259-263. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2016.10.004. eCollection 2016.
To determine the value of the 2D multiple-echo data image combination (MEDIC) sequence relative to the short-tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequence regarding the depiction of chondral lesions in the patellofemoral joint.
During a period of 6 month patients with acute pain at the anterior aspect of the knee, joint effusion and suspected chondral lesion defect in the patellofemoral joint underwent MRI including axial MEDIC and STIR imaging. Patients with chondral lesions in the patellofemoral joint on at least one sequence were included. The MEDIC and STIR sequence were quantitatively compared regarding the patella cartilage-to-effusion contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and qualitatively regarding the depiction of chondral lesions independently scored by two radiologists on a 3-point scale (1 = not depicted; 2 = blurred depicted; 3 = clearly depicted) using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-Test. For the analysis of inter-observer agreement the Cohen's Weighted Kappa test was used.
30 of 58 patients (male: female, 21:9; age: 44 ± 12 yrs) revealed cartilage lesions (fissures, n = 5 including fibrillation; gaps, n = 15; delamination, n = 7; osteoarthritis, n = 3) and were included in this study. The STIR-sequence was significantly (p < 0.001) superior to the MEDIC-sequence regarding both, the patella cartilage-to-effusion CNR (mean CNR: 232 ± 61 vs. 40 ± 16) as well as the depiction of chondral lesion (mean score: 2.83 ± 0.4 vs. 1.75 ± 0.7) with substantial inter-observer agreement in the rating of both sequences (κ = 0.76-0.89).
For the depiction of chondral lesions in the patellofemoral joint, the axial STIR-sequence should be chosen in preference to the axial MEDIC-sequence.
确定二维多回波数据图像组合(MEDIC)序列相对于短反转时间反转恢复(STIR)序列在髌股关节软骨损伤显示方面的价值。
在6个月期间,对膝关节前部急性疼痛、关节积液且怀疑髌股关节软骨损伤缺损的患者进行MRI检查,包括轴位MEDIC和STIR成像。纳入至少在一个序列上显示髌股关节软骨损伤的患者。对MEDIC和STIR序列进行定量比较,比较髌骨软骨与积液的对比噪声比(CNR),并由两名放射科医生独立采用3分制(1 =未显示;2 =显示模糊;3 =显示清晰)对软骨损伤的显示进行定性比较,采用Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验。为分析观察者间的一致性,使用Cohen加权kappa检验。
58例患者中有30例(男∶女,21∶9;年龄:44±12岁)显示有软骨损伤(裂缝,n = 5包括原纤维形成;间隙,n = 15;分层,n = 7;骨关节炎,n = 3)并纳入本研究。在髌骨软骨与积液CNR(平均CNR:232±61 vs. 40±16)以及软骨损伤显示(平均评分:2.83±0.4 vs. 1.75±0.7)方面,STIR序列均显著优于MEDIC序列(p < 0.001),两名观察者对两个序列的评分具有较高的一致性(κ = 0.76 - 0.89)。
对于髌股关节软骨损伤的显示,应优先选择轴位STIR序列而非轴位MEDIC序列。