Ruehm S, Zanetti M, Romero J, Hodler J
Department of Radiology, University of Zurich, Switzerland.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998 Nov-Dec;8(6):1246-51. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880080611.
Our purpose was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of a gradient-echo sequence optimized for cartilage imaging in patellar cartilage abnormalities and to compare it to a standard turbo-spin-echo sequence. Fifty-eight consecutive patients who underwent, within 3 months both MRI and arthroscopy or surgery, were included in the investigation. Two radiologists specializing in musculoskeletal imaging independently assessed axial three-dimensional double-echo steady state (3D-DESS) gradient-echo images and sagittal proton- and T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo images with regard to retropatellar cartilage abnormalities. Possible findings were: 0: normal, 1: cartilage softening, and 2: lesion of the articular surface. Inter- and intraobserver variability was assessed. For cartilage softening, the axial 3D-DESS sequence had a sensitivity of 73%, a specificity of 75%, and an accuracy of 70%. The corresponding results for the sagittal turbo-spin-echo sequence were 53%, 65%, and 62%. For surface lesions, the results for the 3D-DESS sequence were 43%, 92%, and 83% and for the turbo-spin-echo sequence were 60%, 92%, and 86%. Intra- and interobserver agreement was moderate (k = 0.59 and 0.45 [DESS], 0.6 and 0.46 [turbo -spin-echo]). We conclude that the 3D-DESS sequence is moderately accurate in detecting patellar cartilage abnormalities. Compared with the sagittal turbo-spin-echo sequence, the axial 3D-DESS sequence is superior in diagnosing cartilage softening but not surface lesions.
我们的目的是评估针对髌软骨异常优化的梯度回波序列在诊断方面的效能,并将其与标准的快速自旋回波序列进行比较。58例在3个月内同时接受了MRI和关节镜检查或手术的连续患者被纳入研究。两位专门从事肌肉骨骼成像的放射科医生独立评估了轴位三维双回波稳态(3D-DESS)梯度回波图像和矢状位质子加权及T2加权快速自旋回波图像,以观察髌后软骨异常情况。可能的发现为:0:正常;1:软骨软化;2:关节面损伤。评估了观察者间和观察者内的变异性。对于软骨软化,轴位3D-DESS序列的敏感性为73%,特异性为75%,准确性为70%。矢状位快速自旋回波序列的相应结果分别为53%、65%和62%。对于表面损伤,3D-DESS序列的结果分别为43%、92%和83%,快速自旋回波序列的结果分别为60%、92%和86%。观察者内和观察者间的一致性为中等(k = 0.59和0.45 [DESS],0.6和0.46 [快速自旋回波])。我们得出结论,3D-DESS序列在检测髌软骨异常方面具有中等准确性。与矢状位快速自旋回波序列相比,轴位3D-DESS序列在诊断软骨软化方面更具优势,但在诊断表面损伤方面并非如此。