Uemura Kazunori, Inagaki Masashi, Zheng Can, Kawada Toru, Li Meihua, Fukumitsu Masafumi, Sugimachi Masaru
Department of Cardiovascular Dynamics, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, 5-7-1 Fujishirodai, Suita, 565-8565, Japan.
Heart Vessels. 2017 Apr;32(4):484-494. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0922-y. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
Ivabradine, a bradycardic agent, has been shown to stably reduce patient's heart rate (HR) in the setting of acute cardiac care. However, an association between atrial fibrillation (AF) risk and acute ivabradine treatment remains a controversial clinical issue, and has not been thoroughly investigated. Bradycardia and abnormal atrial refractoriness induced by ivabradine treatment may enhance vulnerability to AF induction, especially when vagal nerve is concurrently activated. We aimed to experimentally investigate the effects of acute ivabradine treatment with/without concurrent vagal activation on AF inducibility. In 16 anesthetized dogs, cervical vagal nerves were prepared for electrical stimulation (VS). AF induction rate (AFIR) was determined by atrial burst pacing. HR, atrial action potential duration (APD), atrial effective refractory period (ERP), and AFIR were obtained consecutively at baseline, during delivery of VS (VS alone), after intravenous injection of ivabradine 0.5 mg/kg (n = 8, ivabradine group) or saline (n = 8, saline group), and again during VS delivery (drug+VS). In the ivabradine group, ivabradine alone significantly lowered HR compared to baseline, while ivabradine+VS significantly lowered HR compared to VS alone. Contrary to expectations, there were no significant differences in trends of APD, temporal dispersion of APD, ERP, and AFIR between ivabradine and saline groups. Irrespective of whether ivabradine or saline was injected, VS significantly shortened APD and ERP, and increased AFIR. Interestingly, although bradycardia in response to ivabradine injection was more intense than that to VS alone, AFIR was significantly lower after ivabradine injection than during VS alone. We conclude that, despite its intense bradycardic effect, acute ivabradine treatment does not increase AF inducibility irrespective of underlying vagal activity. This study may constitute support for the safety of using ivabradine in the setting of acute cardiac care.
伊伐布雷定是一种降低心率的药物,已被证明在急性心脏护理中能稳定降低患者心率(HR)。然而,房颤(AF)风险与急性伊伐布雷定治疗之间的关联仍是一个有争议的临床问题,尚未得到充分研究。伊伐布雷定治疗引起的心动过缓和心房不应期异常可能会增加诱发房颤的易感性,尤其是在迷走神经同时被激活时。我们旨在通过实验研究急性伊伐布雷定治疗伴或不伴迷走神经激活对房颤诱发率的影响。在16只麻醉犬中,准备好颈迷走神经用于电刺激(VS)。通过心房猝发起搏确定房颤诱发率(AFIR)。在基线、VS刺激期间(仅VS)、静脉注射0.5mg/kg伊伐布雷定后(n = 8,伊伐布雷定组)或生理盐水后(n = 8,生理盐水组)以及再次进行VS刺激期间(药物+VS),连续获取心率、心房动作电位时程(APD)、心房有效不应期(ERP)和AFIR。在伊伐布雷定组中,与基线相比,单独使用伊伐布雷定可显著降低心率,而与仅VS相比,伊伐布雷定+VS可显著降低心率。与预期相反,伊伐布雷定组和生理盐水组之间在APD趋势、APD的时间离散度、ERP和AFIR方面没有显著差异。无论注射伊伐布雷定还是生理盐水,VS均显著缩短APD和ERP,并增加AFIR。有趣的是,尽管注射伊伐布雷定引起的心动过缓比仅VS更强烈,但注射伊伐布雷定后的AFIR显著低于仅VS期间。我们得出结论,尽管伊伐布雷定有强烈的降心率作用,但无论潜在的迷走神经活动如何,急性伊伐布雷定治疗均不会增加房颤诱发率。本研究可能为在急性心脏护理中使用伊伐布雷定的安全性提供支持。