Cho Sung-Ik, Chough Chung-Kee, Choi Shu-Chung, Chon Jin Young
Department of Neurosurgery, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2016 Nov;59(6):610-614. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.59.6.610. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
The purpose of this study was to present the outcome of the microsurgical foraminotomy via Wiltse paraspinal approach for foraminal or extraforaminal (FEF) stenosis at L5-S1 level. We investigated risk factors associated with poor outcome of microsurgical foraminotomy at L5-S1 level.
We analyzed 21 patients who underwent the microsurgical foraminotomy for FEF stenosis at L5-S1 level. To investigate risk factors associated with poor outcome, patients were classified into two groups (success and failure in foraminotomy). Clinical outcomes were assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of back and leg pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Radiographic parameters including existence of spondylolisthesis, existence and degree of coronal wedging, disc height, foramen height, segmental lordotic angle (SLA) on neutral and dynamic view, segmental range of motion, and global lumbar lordotic angle were investigated.
Postoperative VAS score and ODI improved after foraminotomy. However, there were 7 patients (33%) who had persistent or recurrent leg pain. SLA on neutral and extension radiographic films were significantly associated with the failure in foraminotomy (<0.05). Receiver-operating characteristics curve analysis revealed the optimal cut-off values of SLA on neutral and extension radiographic films for predicting failure in foraminotomy were 17.3° and 24°s, respectively.
Microsurgical foraminotomy for FEF stenosis at L5-S1 level can provide good clinical outcomes in selected patients. Poor outcomes were associated with large SLA on preoperative neutral (>17.3°) and extension radiographic films (>24°).
本研究旨在介绍经Wiltse椎旁入路行显微外科椎间孔切开术治疗L5 - S1节段椎间孔或椎间孔外(FEF)狭窄的疗效。我们调查了与L5 - S1节段显微外科椎间孔切开术疗效不佳相关的危险因素。
我们分析了21例行L5 - S1节段FEF狭窄显微外科椎间孔切开术的患者。为了调查与疗效不佳相关的危险因素,将患者分为两组(椎间孔切开术成功和失败)。通过背部和腿部疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评估临床疗效。研究了包括腰椎滑脱的存在、冠状位楔形变的存在及程度、椎间盘高度、椎间孔高度、中立位和动态位的节段性前凸角(SLA)、节段性活动度以及整体腰椎前凸角等影像学参数。
椎间孔切开术后VAS评分和ODI有所改善。然而,有7例患者(33%)存在持续性或复发性腿痛。中立位和后伸位X线片上的SLA与椎间孔切开术失败显著相关(<0.05)。受试者操作特征曲线分析显示,中立位和后伸位X线片上预测椎间孔切开术失败的SLA最佳截断值分别为17.3°和24°。
L5 - S1节段FEF狭窄的显微外科椎间孔切开术可在部分患者中提供良好的临床疗效。疗效不佳与术前中立位(>17.3°)和后伸位X线片上较大的SLA(>24°)有关。