• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健差异:是采取行动的时候了。

Health care variation: time to act.

机构信息

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney, NSW

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney, NSW.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2016 Nov 21;205(10):S30-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja15.01360.

DOI:10.5694/mja15.01360
PMID:27852200
Abstract

Geographic variation in health care use has been demonstrated in many countries over many years. Such variation can be warranted - in response to patient need or preference for care - or unwarranted. Unwarranted variation raises concerns about equity and appropriateness of care. Recent analyses of health care provision in the Australian atlas of healthcare variation show that when routinely available Australian data are mapped by residence of patient, there are wide variations in rates of use of diagnostic tests, dispensing of prescriptions for a range of indications, surgical procedures and hospital admission rates. Despite the wealth of studies demonstrating variation in care internationally, there is relatively little research that explores the best ways of responding to unwarranted variation. Recommendations for action in the Australian Atlas focus on some approaches that could be used in Australia.

摘要

多年来,许多国家都证明了医疗保健使用的地域差异。这种差异可能是合理的——是为了满足患者对医疗的需求或偏好,也可能是不合理的。不合理的差异引起了人们对医疗保健公平性和适当性的关注。最近对澳大利亚医疗保健差异图谱中医疗保健提供情况的分析表明,当按患者居住地映射常规可用的澳大利亚数据时,诊断测试的使用、各种适应症的处方配药、手术程序和住院率的使用差异很大。尽管有大量研究表明国际上的医疗保健存在差异,但相对较少的研究探讨了应对不合理差异的最佳方法。澳大利亚图谱中的行动建议侧重于澳大利亚可能采用的一些方法。

相似文献

1
Health care variation: time to act.医疗保健差异:是采取行动的时候了。
Med J Aust. 2016 Nov 21;205(10):S30-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja15.01360.
2
Appropriateness of care: why so much variation.医疗服务的适宜性:为何差异如此之大。
Med J Aust. 2016 Nov 21;205(10):452-453. doi: 10.5694/mja16.01041.
3
Thyroid surgery: surgical health equity, best practices in surgical education, and leveraging the power of collaboration.甲状腺手术:手术健康公平性、手术教育的最佳实践以及发挥协作的力量。
Surgery. 2022 Jan;171(1):130-131. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.045. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
4
Measuring Equity in Readmission as an Assessment of Hospital Performance-Reply.衡量再入院公平性以评估医院绩效——回复
JAMA. 2024 May 21;331(19):1677-1678. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.4354.
5
Achieving Equity in Diagnostic Excellence.实现卓越诊断的公平性。
JAMA. 2022 May 24;327(20):1955-1956. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.7252.
6
Development and validation of a search filter to identify equity-focused studies: reducing the number needed to screen.开发和验证一种用于识别以公平为重点的研究的搜索筛选器:减少需要筛选的数量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Oct 12;18(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0567-x.
7
Principles for virtual health care to deliver real equity in diabetes.虚拟医疗保健实现糖尿病真正公平性的原则。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021 Aug;9(8):480-482. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00176-5. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
8
Do primary care quality improvement frameworks consider equity?初级保健质量改进框架是否考虑公平性?
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jul 24;13(3):e002839. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002839.
9
Data Resource Profile: Seeding Success: a cross-sectoral data resource for early childhood health and development research in Australian Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children.数据资源简介:播种成功:澳大利亚原住民和非原住民儿童早期健康与发展研究的跨部门数据资源。
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Oct 1;46(5):1365-1366j. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx051.
10
Variation in coronary angiography rates in Australia: correlations with socio-demographic, health service and disease burden indices.澳大利亚冠状动脉造影率的变化:与社会人口统计学、卫生服务和疾病负担指数的相关性。
Med J Aust. 2016 Aug 1;205(3):114-20. doi: 10.5694/mja15.01410.

引用本文的文献

1
Methodological and reporting quality of Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand clinical guidance documents.澳大利亚和新西兰胸科学会临床指南文件的方法学与报告质量。
Intern Med J. 2025 Aug;55(8):1367-1376. doi: 10.1111/imj.70090. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
2
Criteria For Agreement When Conducting Local Consensus Discussions: A Qualitative Study.进行地方共识讨论时的共识标准:一项定性研究。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2025 May 5;17:159-172. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S522784. eCollection 2025.
3
A qualitative study of how clinicians reach agreement in perioperative pathway development: the Consensus Model for Standardising Healthcare.
关于临床医生如何在围手术期路径开发中达成共识的定性研究:医疗保健标准化共识模型
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Feb 4;6(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00699-9.
4
Theory-informed refinement and tailored implementation of a quality improvement program in maternity care to reduce unwarranted clinical variation across a health service network.基于理论的产妇护理质量改进项目的优化与定制实施,以减少整个医疗服务网络中不必要的临床差异。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 25;25(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12267-x.
5
Data-Driven Implementation Strategy to Optimise Clinician Behaviour Change at Scale in Complex Clinical Environments: A Multicentre Emergency Care Study.在复杂临床环境中大规模优化临床医生行为改变的数据驱动实施策略:一项多中心急诊护理研究
J Adv Nurs. 2025 May;81(5):2701-2721. doi: 10.1111/jan.16461. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
6
Implementation evaluation of an evidence-based emergency nursing framework (HIRAID): study protocol for a step-wedge randomised control trial.基于证据的急诊护理框架(HIRAID)实施评估:一项阶梯式随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 17;13(1):e067022. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067022.
7
Systematic development of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care: a mixed-methods study protocol.系统开发初级保健中皮肤癌管理的质量指标:混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 20;12(6):e059829. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059829.
8
Perceived helpfulness of service sectors used for mental and substance use disorders: Findings from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys.用于精神和物质使用障碍的服务部门的感知帮助作用:世界卫生组织世界精神卫生调查的结果
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2022 Jan 29;16(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13033-022-00516-z.
9
Implementing a digital health model of care in Australian youth mental health services: protocol for impact evaluation.在澳大利亚青少年心理健康服务中实施数字健康护理模式:影响评估方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 12;21(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06394-4.
10
Australia and New Zealand renal gene panel testing in routine clinical practice of 542 families.澳大利亚和新西兰542个家庭常规临床实践中的肾脏基因检测面板测试。
NPJ Genom Med. 2021 Mar 4;6(1):20. doi: 10.1038/s41525-021-00184-x.