获取护理专业学生表现及批判性思维的教育策略比较:基于模拟的培训与综合培训(模拟与批判性思维策略)

A comparison of educational strategies for the acquisition of nursing student's performance and critical thinking: simulation-based training vs. integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies).

作者信息

Zarifsanaiey Nahid, Amini Mitra, Saadat Farideh

机构信息

Department of E-learning, Virtual School, Center of Excellence for e-Learning in Medical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Quality improvement in clinical teaching Research Center, Education Development Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Sina- Sadra Halls Complex, Neshat Ave, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 16;16(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0812-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a need to change the focus of nursing education from traditional teacher-centered training programs to student-centered active methods. The integration of the two active learning techniques will improve the effectiveness of training programs. The objective of this study is to compare the effects of the integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies) and simulation-based training on the performance level and critical thinking ability of nursing students.

METHODS

The present quasi-experimental study was performed in 2014 on 40 students who were studying practical nursing principles and skills course in the first half of the academic year in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Students were randomly divided into control (n = 20) and experimental (n = 20) groups. After training students through simulation and integrated education (simulation and critical thinking strategies), the students' critical thinking ability and performance were evaluated via the use of California Critical Thinking Ability Questionnaire B (CCTST) and Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) comprising 10 stations, respectively. The external reliability of the California Critical Thinking questionnaire was reported by Case B.to be between 0.78 and 0.80 and the validity of OSCE was approved by 5 members of the faculty. Furthermore, by using Split Half method (the correlation between odd and even stations), the reliability of the test was approved with correlation coefficient of 0.66. Data were analyzed using t-test and Mann-Whitney test. A significance level of 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean scores of the experimental group performance level were higher than the mean score of the control group performance level. This difference was statistically significant and students in the experimental group in OSCE stations had significantly higher performance than the control group (P <0.001). However, the mean scores obtained for the critical thinking did not increase before and after the intervention.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that, the students' performance level was increased by the application of integrated training (simulation and critical thinking strategies).

摘要

背景

有必要将护理教育的重点从传统的以教师为中心的培训项目转变为以学生为中心的主动学习方法。将两种主动学习技术相结合将提高培训项目的有效性。本研究的目的是比较综合培训(模拟和批判性思维策略)和基于模拟的培训对护理专业学生表现水平和批判性思维能力的影响。

方法

本项准实验研究于2014年对40名在设拉子医科大学上半学年学习实用护理原则和技能课程的学生进行。学生被随机分为对照组(n = 20)和实验组(n = 20)。通过模拟和综合教育(模拟和批判性思维策略)对学生进行培训后,分别使用加利福尼亚批判性思维能力问卷B(CCTST)和由10个站点组成的客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)对学生的批判性思维能力和表现进行评估。案例B报告加利福尼亚批判性思维问卷的外部信度在0.78至0.80之间,OSCE的效度得到5名教员的认可。此外,通过使用折半法(奇数和偶数站点之间的相关性),测试的信度经相关系数0.66验证。使用t检验和曼-惠特尼检验分析数据。显著性水平0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

实验组表现水平的平均得分高于对照组表现水平的平均得分。这种差异具有统计学意义,实验组学生在OSCE站点的表现明显高于对照组(P <0.001)。然而,干预前后获得的批判性思维平均得分没有增加。

结论

结果表明,综合培训(模拟和批判性思维策略)的应用提高了学生的表现水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9005/5112666/7ef7c0733f4a/12909_2016_812_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索