Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Apr 5;14:47. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-47.
In the UK care homes are one of the main providers of long term care for older people with dementia. Despite the recent increase in care home research, residents with dementia are often excluded from studies. Care home research networks have been recommended by the Ministerial Advisory Group on Dementia Research (MAGDR) as a way of increasing research opportunities for residents with dementia. This paper reports on an evaluation of the feasibility and early impact of an initiative to increase care home participation in research.
A two phase, mixed methods approach was used; phase 1 established a baseline of current and recent studies including the National Institute for Health Research portfolio. To explore the experiences of recruiting care homes and research participation, interviews were conducted with researchers working for the Dementia and Neurodegenerative Diseases Research Network (DeNDRoN) and care home managers. In phase 2, four DeNDRoN area offices recruited care homes to a care home network for their region. The care home networks were separate from the DeNDRoN research network. Diaries were used to document and cost recruitment; DeNDRoN staff were interviewed to understand the barriers, facilitators and impact of the care home networks.
Thirty three current or recent studies were identified as involving care homes as care home specific studies or those which included residents. Further details of care home recruitment were obtained on 20 studies by contacting study teams. Care home managers were keen to be involved in research that provided staff support, benefits for residents and with minimal disruption. In phase 2, 141 care homes were recruited to the care home research networks, through corporate engagement and individual invitation. Pre-existing relationships with care homes facilitated recruitment. Sites with minimal experience of working with care homes identified the need for care home training for researchers.
Phase 1 review revealed a small but increasing number of studies involving care homes. Phase 2 demonstrated the feasibility of care home research networks, their potential to increase recruitment to research and develop partnerships between health services and care homes, but highlighted the need for care home training for researchers.
在英国,养老院是为痴呆症老年人提供长期护理的主要机构之一。尽管最近养老院研究有所增加,但痴呆症患者往往被排除在研究之外。痴呆症研究网络已被部长级痴呆症研究咨询小组(MAGDR)推荐为增加痴呆症患者研究机会的一种方式。本文报告了一项评估增加养老院参与研究的可行性和早期影响的倡议。
采用两阶段混合方法;第一阶段确定了当前和最近的研究的基线,包括国家卫生研究所的投资组合。为了探索招募养老院和研究参与的经验,对为痴呆症和神经退行性疾病研究网络(DeNDRoN)工作的研究人员和养老院经理进行了访谈。在第二阶段,四个 DeNDRoN 区域办事处招募养老院参加其所在地区的养老院网络。养老院网络与 DeNDRoN 研究网络分开。使用日记记录和招募成本;对 DeNDRoN 工作人员进行了访谈,以了解养老院网络的障碍、促进因素和影响。
确定了 33 项当前或最近的研究,这些研究涉及养老院作为特定养老院的研究或那些包含居民的研究。通过联系研究团队,在 20 项研究中获得了养老院招募的更多详细信息。养老院经理热衷于参与提供员工支持、为居民带来利益且干扰最小的研究。在第二阶段,通过企业参与和个别邀请,有 141 家养老院被招募到养老院研究网络。与养老院的现有关系促进了招募。与养老院合作经验有限的地点确定了研究人员需要进行养老院培训。
第一阶段的审查显示,涉及养老院的研究数量虽小但在不断增加。第二阶段表明养老院研究网络是可行的,它们有可能增加对研究的招募,并在卫生服务机构和养老院之间建立伙伴关系,但突出了研究人员对养老院培训的需求。