Hartogsohn Ido
Science, Technology and Society Program, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
J Psychopharmacol. 2016 Dec;30(12):1259-1267. doi: 10.1177/0269881116677852. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
Placebo response theory and set and setting theory are two fields which examine how non-biological factors shape the response to therapy. Both consider factors such as expectancy, preparation and beliefs to be crucial for understanding the extra-pharmacological processes which shape the response to drugs. Yet there are also fundamental differences between the two theories. Set and setting concerns itself with response to psychoactive drugs only; placebo theory relates to all therapeutic interventions. Placebo theory is aimed at medical professionals; set and setting theory is aimed at professionals and drug users alike. Placebo theory is primarily descriptive, describing how placebo acts; set and setting theory is primarily prescriptive, educating therapists and users on how to control and optimize the effects of drugs. This paper examines how placebo theory and set and setting theory can complement and benefit each other, broadening our understanding of how non-biological factors shape response to drugs and other treatment interventions.
安慰剂反应理论以及环境与背景理论是两个研究非生物因素如何影响治疗反应的领域。二者都认为期望、准备状态和信念等因素对于理解影响药物反应的非药理学过程至关重要。然而,这两种理论之间也存在根本差异。环境与背景理论仅关注对精神活性药物的反应;安慰剂理论则适用于所有治疗干预措施。安慰剂理论面向医学专业人员;环境与背景理论则同时面向专业人员和药物使用者。安慰剂理论主要是描述性的,描述安慰剂的作用方式;环境与背景理论主要是规范性的,教导治疗师和使用者如何控制和优化药物效果。本文探讨了安慰剂理论与环境与背景理论如何相互补充并相互受益,拓宽我们对非生物因素如何影响药物及其他治疗干预反应的理解。