Suppr超能文献

宗教神经科学综述:该领域概述、局限性及未来干预措施

A review of the neuroscience of religion: an overview of the field, its limitations, and future interventions.

作者信息

Carvour Harrison M, Radke Anna K, French Nathan S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, OH, United States.

Department of Comparative Religion, Miami University, Oxford, OH, United States.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2025 Aug 19;19:1587794. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1587794. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

The neuroscience of religion (NoR), a field that studies various neural mechanisms and functions alongside their correlational relationships with religious phenomena, holds immense potential for development. Standard research methods, including brain imaging techniques and lesion studies, establish relationships between brain functions and religious practices, beliefs, and experiences. Despite increasing interest in this field since the start of the century, NoR has many limitations regarding the technology presently used, particularly in investigating specific aspects of religious behaviors regarding ritualized movements. However, using technologies not presently used in the field, such as functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), along with applying other religious theories, could allow researchers to examine other behaviors, expand their understanding of religion, and bypass current limitations. Therefore, this review paper critically examines NoR, including discussions on methodologies and conclusions from the field, the application of theories of religion currently used, limitations of research methods, the potential incorporation of other theories of religion in the future, and the utilization of other technologies not presently employed in the field, possibly opening new avenues for inquiry and analysis.

摘要

宗教神经科学(NoR)是一个研究各种神经机制和功能及其与宗教现象的相关关系的领域,具有巨大的发展潜力。包括脑成像技术和病变研究在内的标准研究方法,确立了脑功能与宗教实践、信仰和体验之间的关系。尽管自本世纪初以来,该领域的关注度不断提高,但宗教神经科学在目前所使用的技术方面存在许多局限性,尤其是在研究仪式化动作等宗教行为的特定方面。然而,使用该领域目前未使用的技术,如功能近红外光谱技术(fNIRS),并应用其他宗教理论,可能会使研究人员能够研究其他行为,拓展他们对宗教的理解,并突破当前的局限。因此,这篇综述文章对宗教神经科学进行了批判性审视,包括对该领域的方法论和结论、当前所使用的宗教理论的应用、研究方法的局限性、未来可能纳入的其他宗教理论,以及利用该领域目前未使用的其他技术的讨论,这可能会开辟新的探究和分析途径。

相似文献

1
A review of the neuroscience of religion: an overview of the field, its limitations, and future interventions.
Front Neurosci. 2025 Aug 19;19:1587794. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1587794. eCollection 2025.
9
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
10

本文引用的文献

1
The neural underpinning of religious beliefs: Evidence from brain lesions.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Oct 6;16:977600. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.977600. eCollection 2022.
2
The neuroscience of spirituality, religion, and mental health: A systematic review and synthesis.
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Dec;156:100-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.10.003. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
3
A Neural Circuit for Spirituality and Religiosity Derived From Patients With Brain Lesions.
Biol Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 15;91(4):380-388. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
4
Brain networks involved in the influence of religion on empathy in male Vietnam War veterans.
Sci Rep. 2021 May 26;11(1):11047. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90481-3.
5
From the Lab to the Field: Potential Applications of Dry EEG Systems to Understand the Brain-Behavior Relationship in Sports.
Front Neurosci. 2019 Aug 27;13:893. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00893. eCollection 2019.
6
Absorption and spiritual experience: A review of evidence and potential mechanisms.
Conscious Cogn. 2019 Aug;73:102760. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
7
Localization of Active Brain Sources From EEG Signals Using Empirical Mode Decomposition: A Comparative Study.
Front Integr Neurosci. 2018 Nov 2;12:55. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2018.00055. eCollection 2018.
8
Psychedelics and the essential importance of context.
J Psychopharmacol. 2018 Jul;32(7):725-731. doi: 10.1177/0269881118754710. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
10
Research Gaps and Controversies in Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy: A Review.
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Oct 1;74(10):1255-1262. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2396.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验