Maddin Hillary C, Piekarski Nadine, Sefton Elizabeth M, Hanken James
Museum of Comparative Zoology , Harvard University , 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 , USA.
R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Aug 10;3(8):160356. doi: 10.1098/rsos.160356. eCollection 2016 Aug.
Bones of the cranial vault appear to be highly conserved among tetrapod vertebrates. Moreover, bones identified with the same name are assumed to be evolutionarily homologous. However, recent developmental studies reveal a key difference in the embryonic origin of cranial vault bones between representatives of two amniote lineages, mammals and birds, thereby challenging this view. In the mouse, the frontal is derived from cranial neural crest (CNC) but the parietal is derived from mesoderm, placing the CNC-mesoderm boundary at the suture between these bones. In the chicken, this boundary is located within the frontal. This difference and related data have led several recent authors to suggest that bones of the avian cranial vault are misidentified and should be renamed. To elucidate this apparent conflict, we fate-mapped CNC and mesoderm in axolotl to reveal the contributions of these two embryonic cell populations to the cranial vault in a urodele amphibian. The CNC-mesoderm boundary in axolotl is located between the frontal and parietal bones, as in the mouse but unlike the chicken. If, however, the avian frontal is regarded instead as a fused frontal and parietal (i.e. frontoparietal) and the parietal as a postparietal, then the cranial vault of birds becomes developmentally and topologically congruent with those of urodeles and mammals. This alternative hypothesis of cranial vault homology is also phylogenetically consistent with data from the tetrapod fossil record, where frontal, parietal and postparietal bones are present in stem lineages of all extant taxa, including birds. It further implies that a postparietal may be present in most non-avian archosaurs, but fused to the parietal or supraoccipital as in many extant mammals.
颅骨在四足脊椎动物中似乎高度保守。此外,具有相同名称的骨骼被认为在进化上是同源的。然而,最近的发育研究揭示了哺乳动物和鸟类这两个羊膜动物谱系代表之间颅骨骨骼胚胎起源的关键差异,从而对这一观点提出了挑战。在小鼠中,额骨源自颅神经嵴(CNC),但顶骨源自中胚层,CNC - 中胚层边界位于这些骨骼之间的缝处。在鸡中,这个边界位于额骨内部。这种差异及相关数据导致几位近期的作者提出,鸟类颅骨的骨骼被错误识别,应该重新命名。为了阐明这一明显的冲突,我们对蝾螈的CNC和中胚层进行了命运图谱分析,以揭示这两个胚胎细胞群对有尾两栖动物颅骨的贡献。蝾螈的CNC - 中胚层边界位于额骨和顶骨之间,与小鼠相同,但与鸡不同。然而,如果将鸟类的额骨视为融合的额骨和顶骨(即额顶骨),将顶骨视为顶后骨,那么鸟类的颅骨在发育和拓扑结构上就与有尾两栖动物和哺乳动物的颅骨一致了。这种颅骨同源性的替代假说在系统发育上也与四足动物化石记录的数据一致,在所有现存类群(包括鸟类)的干群中都存在额骨、顶骨和顶后骨。它还进一步暗示,在大多数非鸟类主龙类中可能存在顶后骨,但如许多现存哺乳动物一样,与顶骨或枕上骨融合在一起。