Abat F, Sánchez-Sánchez J L, Martín-Nogueras A M, Calvo-Arenillas J I, Yajeya J, Méndez-Sánchez R, Monllau J C, Gelber P E
Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, ReSport Clinic, Rambla Fabra i Puig 47, 08030, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Physiotherapy, University of Salamanca, Campus Miguel de Unamuno, 37007, Salamanca, Spain.
J Exp Orthop. 2016 Dec;3(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40634-016-0070-4. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
Patellar tendinopathy has a high prevalence rate among athletes. Different therapeutic options can be found in the current literature, but none of them has been clearly established as the gold standard. The purpose of this study is to compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the clinical efficacy of eccentric exercise combined with either an ultrasound-guided galvanic electrolysis technique (USGET) or conventional electrophysiotherapy to treat patellar tendinopathy.
Sixty patients diagnosed with patellar tendinopathy were randomized into two groups. Group 1 (n = 30) received electrophysiotherapy treatment consisting of ultrasound, laser and interferential current techniques. Group 2 (n = 30) received USGET. Both groups did the same standardized eccentric exercise program. Periodic assessments of the subjects were carried out with the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patella (VISA-P) score. An analysis of means and a survival study were performed.
There were statistically significant differences in the VISA-P between the baseline and final follow-up in each treatment group. Group 1 (conventional electrophysiotherapy) went from 52.5 ± 18.8 to 61.9 ± 13.7 (in VISA-P < 90 subgroup) and from 69.1 ± 9.1 to 95.2 ± 2.5 (in VISA-P > 90 subgroup). Group 2 (USGET) went from 51.4 ± 17.9 to 63.3 ± 14.3 (in VISA-P < 90 subgroup) and from 66.3 ± 13.1 to 97.1 ± 1.7 (in VISA-P > 90 subgroup). There were statistically significant correlations between the baseline and final score in the VISA-P > 90 subjects upon completing the study but no statistically significant correlations between subjects with VISA-P < 90. The mean number of sessions applied was 22.6 ± 2.5 in Group 1 and 3.2 ± 0.9 in Group 2. The success probability in Group 1 was 36.1% versus 72.4% in Group 2. The difference was statistically significant.
The results obtained with the combination of USGET and eccentric exercise reported better outcomes than with the conventional electrophysiotherapy techniques in the treatment of patellar tendinopathy.
髌腱病在运动员中患病率很高。目前的文献中有不同的治疗选择,但没有一种被明确确立为金标准。本研究的目的是在一项随机对照试验中,比较离心运动结合超声引导直流电电解技术(USGET)或传统电生理疗法治疗髌腱病的临床疗效。
60例被诊断为髌腱病的患者被随机分为两组。第1组(n = 30)接受由超声、激光和干扰电流技术组成的电生理治疗。第2组(n = 30)接受USGET治疗。两组都进行相同的标准化离心运动计划。使用维多利亚运动评估-髌骨(VISA-P)评分对受试者进行定期评估。进行了均值分析和生存研究。
每个治疗组在基线和最终随访时的VISA-P评分存在统计学显著差异。第1组(传统电生理疗法)在VISA-P < 90亚组中从52.5 ± 18.8提高到61.9 ± 13.7,在VISA-P > 90亚组中从69.1 ± 9.1提高到95.2 ± 2.5。第2组(USGET)在VISA-P < 90亚组中从51.4 ± 17.9提高到63.3 ± 14.3,在VISA-P > 90亚组中从66.3 ± 13.1提高到97.1 ± 1.7。完成研究后,VISA-P > 90的受试者基线和最终评分之间存在统计学显著相关性,但VISA-P < 90的受试者之间无统计学显著相关性。第1组平均治疗次数为22.6 ± 2.5次,第2组为3.2 ± 0.9次。第1组的成功概率为36.1%,而第2组为72.4%。差异具有统计学显著性。
在髌腱病治疗中,USGET与离心运动相结合所获得的结果比传统电生理疗法技术的效果更好。