Suppr超能文献

超声引导与触诊引导下髌腱穿刺针放置的精准度与安全性:一项尸体研究

Precision and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided versus Palpation-Guided Needle Placement on the Patellar Tendon: A Cadaveric Study.

作者信息

Arias-Buría José L, Borrella-Andrés Sergio, Rodríguez-Sanz Jacobo, López-de-Celis Carlos, Malo-Urriés Miguel, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas César, Gallego-Sendarrubias Gracia M, González-Rueda Vanessa, Pérez-Bellmunt Albert, Albarova-Corral Isabel

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Av. de Atenas, s/n, Alcorcón, 28922 Madrid, Spain.

Health Sciences Faculty, Department of Physiatry and Nursing, University of Zaragoza, C/Domingo Miral S/N, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.

出版信息

Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 15;13(10):2060. doi: 10.3390/life13102060.

Abstract

For decades, needling interventions have been performed based on manual palpation and anatomic knowledge. The increasing use of real-time ultrasonography in clinical practice has improved the accuracy and safety of needling techniques. Although currently ultrasound-guided procedures are routinely used for patellar tendon pathology, e.g., during percutaneous electrolysis, the accuracy of these procedures is still unknown. This study used a cadaveric model to compare and evaluate both the accuracy and safety of ultrasound-guided and palpation-guided needling techniques for the patellar tendon. A total of five physical therapists performed a series of 20 needle insertion task each (n = 100), 10 insertions based on manual palpation (n = 50) and 10 insertions guided with ultrasound (n = 50) to place a needle along the interface between the patellar tendon and Hoffa's fat pad. All procedures were performed on cryopreserved knee specimens. Distance to the targeted tissue, time of the procedure, accurate rate of insertions, number of passes, and unintentional punctured structures between both applications (with and without ultrasound guiding) were compared. The results revealed higher accuracy (100% vs. 80%), a lower distance from needle to the targeted tissue (0.25 ± 0.65 vs. 2.5 ± 1.9 mm), longer surface of contact with the needle (15.5 ± 6.65 vs. 4.7 ± 7.5 mm), and a lower frequency of patellar tendon puncture (16% vs. 52%, < 0.001) with the ultrasound-guided procedure as opposed to palpation-guided one. Nevertheless, the ultrasound-guided procedure took longer (54.8 ± 26.8 vs. 23.75 ± 15.4 s) and required more passes (2.55 ± 1.9 vs. 1.5 ± 0.95) to be conducted than the palpation-guided procedure (all, < 0.001). According to these findings, the accuracy of invasive procedures applied on the patellar tendon is higher when conducted with ultrasound guidance than when conducted just on manual palpation or anatomical landmark. These results suggest that ultrasound could improve the clinical application of invasive procedures at the fat-patellar tendon interface. Due to the anatomical features of the targeted tissue, some procedures require this precision, so the use of ultrasound is recommended.

摘要

几十年来,针刺干预一直基于手动触诊和解剖学知识进行。实时超声在临床实践中的使用日益增加,提高了针刺技术的准确性和安全性。虽然目前超声引导下的操作常用于髌腱病变,例如在经皮电解过程中,但这些操作的准确性仍不明确。本研究使用尸体模型比较和评估超声引导和触诊引导的髌腱针刺技术的准确性和安全性。共有五名物理治疗师每人进行了一系列20次针刺任务(n = 100),其中10次基于手动触诊(n = 50),10次在超声引导下(n = 50),将针沿髌腱与Hoffa脂肪垫之间的界面放置。所有操作均在冷冻保存的膝关节标本上进行。比较了两种操作(有和没有超声引导)到目标组织的距离、操作时间、针刺准确率、进针次数和意外穿刺结构的数量。结果显示,与触诊引导的操作相比,超声引导的操作具有更高的准确性(100%对80%)、针到目标组织的距离更短(0.25±0.65对2.5±1.9毫米)、与针接触的表面更长(15.5±6.65对4.7±7.5毫米)以及髌腱穿刺频率更低(16%对52%,P<0.001)。然而,超声引导的操作比触诊引导的操作花费的时间更长(54.8±26.8对23.75±15.4秒),并且需要更多的进针次数(2.55±1.9对1.5±0.95)(所有,P<0.001)。根据这些发现,在超声引导下对髌腱进行侵入性操作的准确性高于仅基于手动触诊或解剖标志进行的操作。这些结果表明,超声可以改善在脂肪-髌腱界面进行侵入性操作的临床应用。由于目标组织的解剖特征,一些操作需要这种精确性,因此建议使用超声。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a22/10608026/444c0e375246/life-13-02060-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验